science and technology Diabetes Core Update – April 2019 By diabetescoreupdate.libsyn.com Published On :: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 15:50:29 +0000 Diabetes Core Update is a monthly podcast that presents and discusses the latest clinically relevant articles from the American Diabetes Association’s four science and medical journals – Diabetes, Diabetes Care, Clinical Diabetes, and Diabetes Spectrum. Each episode is approximately 20 minutes long and presents 5-6 recently published articles from ADA journals. Intended for practicing physicians and health care professionals, Diabetes Core Update discusses how the latest research and information published in journals of the American Diabetes Association are relevant to clinical practice and can be applied in a treatment setting. This issue will review: Normalization of functional beta cell capacity after weight loss in type 2 diabetes Screening for glucose intolerance and diabetes in patients with coronary artery disease Trends Prescribing Preferences for SGLT2 Inhibitors and GLP-1 Receptor Agonists, 2013–2018 Impact of a Telephone Intervention to Improve Diabetes Control on Healthcare Utilization and Cost for Adults in South Bronx, New York – Efficacy and Safety of Dapagliflozin Plus Saxagliptin Versus Insulin Glargine Over 52 Weeks as Add‐on to Metformin With or Without Sulfonylurea in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes The Association Between Poor Glycemic Control and Health Care Costs in People With Diabetes For more information about each of ADA’s science and medical journals, please visit www.diabetesjournals.org. Presented by: Neil Skolnik, M.D., Professor of Family and Community Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University; Associate Director, Family Medicine Residency Program, Abington Jefferson Health John J. Russell, M.D., Professor of Family and Community Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University; Director, Family Medicine Residency Program, Chair-Department of Family Medicine, Abington Jefferson Health Full Article
science and technology Diabetes Core Update: Therapeutic Inertia – April 2020 By diabetescoreupdate.libsyn.com Published On :: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 19:00:00 +0000 In this first episode of a three-part series on “Disrupting Therapeutic Inertia in Diabetes Management,” Drs. John Russell and Neil Skolnik examine a case study of a 55-year-old man with type 2 diabetes (3 years duration, A1C 8.2%). In so doing, they review six articles that define achievement gaps in reaching A1C goals and the reasons for why those gaps exist. In episodes 2 and 3 of this series, Drs. Russell and Skolnik we will look at additional causes of therapeutic inertia and solutions for overcoming it. This special three-part series on therapeutic inertia is supported by independent educational grant from Sanofi (https://www.sanofi.com). This issue will review: Achievement of target therapeutic goals in persons with T2DM Achievement of therapeutic goals from 2005 – 2015 Clinical Inertia in Newly Diagnosed Type 2 DM Clinical Inertia over Time in Type 2 DM Gap Between Efficacy in Randomized Controlled Trials and Effectiveness in Real-World Use Difference between Clinical Trial and Real-World Studies Achievement of Target A1C <7.0% in Patients Treated with Basal Insulin in RCTs and Clinical Practice For more information about each of ADA’s science and medical journals, please visit www.diabetesjournals.org. Presented by: Neil Skolnik, M.D., Professor of Family and Community Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University; Associate Director, Family Medicine Residency Program, Abington Jefferson Health John J. Russell, M.D., Professor of Family and Community Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University; Director, Family Medicine Residency Program, Chair-Department of Family Medicine, Abington Jefferson Health Full Article
science and technology Diabetes Core Update: Covid-19 - Planning Sick Days April 2019 By diabetescoreupdate.libsyn.com Published On :: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 23:47:13 +0000 This special issue focuses on Diabetes, Covid-19 and managing patient’s diabetes when they are sick. Recorded April 1, 2020. This podcast will cover: How do we help our patients with diabetes stay safe Helping patient negotiate safety issues in the workplace Safety Issues when people do not come in for care Managing SGLT-2 inhibitors during the pandemic Home detection and care of DKA Renewing Medications Telemedicine Visits Intended for practicing physicians and health care professionals, Diabetes Core Update discusses how the latest research and information published in journals of the American Diabetes Association are relevant to clinical practice and can be applied in a treatment setting. Presented by: Louis Philipson, MD, PhD, ADA Past President, Medicine & Science, University of Chicago Anne Peters, MD, Diabetologist, University of Southern California Full Article
science and technology Diabetes Core Update: Covid-19 – Inpatient Management of Persons with Diabetes April 2019 By diabetescoreupdate.libsyn.com Published On :: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 16:44:58 +0000 This special issue focuses on Diabetes, Covid-19 and Inpatient Management. Recorded April 3, 2020. This podcast will cover: Risk with Diabetes of Covid-19 and Complications of Covid-19 Management of Hyperglycemia during Covid-19 Infection Sub-cutaneous Insulin for DKA CGM in the Hospital Setting Diabetes Education in the Hospital During Covid-19 Intended for practicing physicians and health care professionals, Diabetes Core Update discusses how the latest research and information published in journals of the American Diabetes Association are relevant to clinical practice and can be applied in a treatment setting. Presented by: Irl Hirsch, MD, Professor of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle Guillermo E. Umpierrez, MD, CDE, Professor of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta Georgia Full Article
science and technology Diabetes Core Update: Covid-19 – Deep Dive into Medication Management April 2019 By diabetescoreupdate.libsyn.com Published On :: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 18:00:00 +0000 This special issue focuses on Diabetes, Covid-19 and Inpatient Management. Recorded April 14, 2020. This podcast will cover: Inpatient Medication Management for Persons Admitted with Diabetes Outpatient Medication Management for Persons with Diabetes Hypoglycemic Medication Management ACE and ARBs NSAIDs Intended for practicing physicians and health care professionals, Diabetes Core Update discusses how the latest research and information published in journals of the American Diabetes Association are relevant to clinical practice and can be applied in a treatment setting. Presented by: Neil Skolnik, M.D., Professor of Family and Community Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Associate Director, Family Medicine Residency Program, Abington Jefferson Health Dr. Joshua Neumiller, Vice Chair & Allen I. White Distinguished Associate Professor of Pharmacotherapy at Washington State University Full Article
science and technology Diabetes Core Update: Covid-19 and Diabetes – Considerations for Health Care Professionals - April 2019 By diabetescoreupdate.libsyn.com Published On :: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 18:00:00 +0000 Diabetes Core Update: Covid-19 and Diabetes – Considerations for Health Care Professionals - April 2019 This special issue is an audio version of the American Diabetes Associations Covid-19 leadership team discussing a range of issues on Covid-19 and Diabetes. Recorded March 31, 2020. Topics include: Access to medications Effect on Diabetes Self-management Can Patients take their own Supplies if they are an inpatient in the hospital – particularly insulin pumps and CGM Considerations for Specific Hypoglycemic Medications during Inpatient Hospitalization Differences in Management for Persons with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 Receptor Agonists use During Covid-19 Infection Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease during Covid-19 ACEs and ARBs Stress among Healthcare Professionals Intended for practicing physicians and health care professionals, Diabetes Core Update discusses how the latest research and information published in journals of the American Diabetes Association are relevant to clinical practice and can be applied in a treatment setting. Presented by: Robert Eckel, MD ADA President, Medicine & Science University of Colorado Mary de Groot, PhD ADA President, Health Care & Education Indiana University Irl Hirsch, MD University of Washington Anne Peters, MD University of Southern California Louis Philipson, MD, PhD ADA Past President, Medicine & Science University of Chicago Neil Skolnik, MD Abington Jefferson Health Full Article
science and technology Diabetes Core Update: COVID-19 – Inpatient Management # 2 April 2019 By diabetescoreupdate.libsyn.com Published On :: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 19:20:01 +0000 This special issue focuses on Answering Questions about Inpatient Care During Covid 19, a follow-up discussion to the Townhall meeting discussing inpatient care. Recorded April 15, 2020. This podcast will cover: Subcutaneous Insulin Infusions CGM use in the inpatient setting Insulin Infusion pumps in the inpatient setting Inpatient Glycemic Control - what are the recommendations? Oral Medications Hydroxychloroquine adverse effects in persons with diabetes Intended for practicing physicians and health care professionals, Diabetes Core Update discusses how the latest research and information published in journals of the American Diabetes Association are relevant to clinical practice and can be applied in a treatment setting. Presented by: Robert Eckel, MD ADA President, Medicine & Science Irl Hirsch, MD University of Washington Mary Korytkowski, MD University of Pittsburgh Full Article
science and technology Diabetes Core Update: COVID-19 – Inpatient Townhall April 2019 By diabetescoreupdate.libsyn.com Published On :: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 17:05:39 +0000 This special issue focuses on Answering Questions about Inpatient Care During Covid 19, a follow-up discussion to the Townhall meeting discussing inpatient care. Recorded April 7, 2020. This is a part of the American Diabetes Associations ongoing project providing resources for practicing clinicians on the care of Diabetes during the Covid-19 pandemic. Todays discussion is an audio version of a webinar recorded on April 17th, 2020 where the panel answered questions submitted during and after the last webinar/townhall a week prior on inpatient management of patients with diabetes with Covid-19. Presented by: Shivani Agarwal, MD, MPH Albert Einstein College of Medicine Jennifer Clements, PharmD, FCCP, BCPS, CDE, BCACP American Pharmacists Association Robert Eckel, MD ADA President, Medicine & Science Irl Hirsch, MD University of Washington Melanie Mabrey, DNP Co-Chair - American Association of Nurse Practitioners - Endocrine Specialty Practice Group Jane Jeffrie-Seley, DNP, BC-ADM, CDCES Association of Diabetes Care and Education Specialists Full Article
science and technology Diabetes Core Update: COVID-19 – Telehealth and COVID-19 , April 2019 By diabetescoreupdate.libsyn.com Published On :: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 18:00:00 +0000 This special issue focuses on Telehealth and COVID-19. Recorded March 31, 2020. Intended for practicing physicians and health care professionals, Diabetes Core Update discusses how the latest research and information published in journals of the American Diabetes Association are relevant to clinical practice and can be applied in a treatment setting. Presented by: Neil Skolnik, MD Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Eric Johnson, MD University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences Full Article
science and technology Diabetes Core Update: COVID-19 – Caring for Ourselves while Caring for Others, April 2019 By diabetescoreupdate.libsyn.com Published On :: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 12:06:27 +0000 This special issue focuses on caring for ourselves while caring for others. Recorded April 1, 2020. This is a part of the American Diabetes Associations ongoing project providing resources for practicing clinicians on the care of Diabetes during the Covid-19 pandemic. Todays discussion is an audio version of a webinar recorded on April 1, 2020. Presented by: Neil Skolnik, M.D. Abington Jefferson Health Aaron Sutton Behavioral Health Consultant Abington Jefferson Health Full Article
science and technology Diabetes Core Update: COVID-19 - Empowering Patients with Diabetes During Covid-19 April 2019 By diabetescoreupdate.libsyn.com Published On :: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 18:00:00 +0000 This special issue focuses on Empowering Patients with Diabetes During Covid-19 Recorded April 9, 2020. This podcast will cover: Defining terms and talking with patients about the epidemiology of COVID-19 How should providers talk with patients about the risk of COVID-19 – The impact of testing COVID-19 infection and its impact on self-care Barriers to Problem Solving Diabetes Self Care Helping to Create a Sense of Normalcy Self-Care – “Its OK not to be OK” – Acknowledging our feelings Coping with Stress Intended for practicing physicians and health care professionals, Diabetes Core Update discusses how the latest research and information published in journals of the American Diabetes Association are relevant to clinical practice and can be applied in a treatment setting. Presented by: Mary de Groot, PhD President, Health Care & Education, ADA Jane Jeffrie-Seley, DNP, MPH New York Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medicine Jean M. Lawrence, ScD, MPH, MSSA, FACE Southern California Permanente Medical Group Kaiser Permanente Research Full Article
science and technology Diabetes Core Update: COVID-19 – Cardiovascular Concerns, April 2019 By diabetescoreupdate.libsyn.com Published On :: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 23:00:00 +0000 This special issue focuses on Cardiovascular Concerns with Diabetes an COVID-19. Recorded April 19, 2020. This is a part of the American Diabetes Associations ongoing project providing resources for practicing clinicians on the care of Diabetes during the Covid-19 pandemic. Todays discussion is an audio version of a webinar recorded on April 19, 2020. Presented by: Neil Skolnik, M.D., Professor of Family and Community Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University; Associate Director, Family Medicine Residency Program, Abington Jefferson Health John J. Russell, M.D., Professor of Family and Community Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University; Director, Family Medicine Residency Program, Chair-Department of Family Medicine, Abington Jefferson Health Full Article
science and technology Diabetes Core Update: COVID-19 – Older Adults with Diabetes and Covid-19 April 2019 By diabetescoreupdate.libsyn.com Published On :: Sun, 26 Apr 2020 18:00:00 +0000 This special issue focuses on Older Adults with Diabetes and Covid-19. Recorded April 20, 2020. This podcast will cover: Risk of COVID-19 in Older Adults What are the recommendations for glucose control during the pandemic Telemedicine Challenges to home care Long-term care settings Intended for practicing physicians and health care professionals, Diabetes Core Update discusses how the latest research and information published in journals of the American Diabetes Association are relevant to clinical practice and can be applied in a treatment setting. Presented by: Irl Hirsch, MD University of Washington Elbert Huang, MD, MPH, FACP University of Chicago Stacie Levine, MD University of Chicago Full Article
science and technology Diabetes Core Update: COVID-19 – Impact on Youth and their Families, May 2019 By diabetescoreupdate.libsyn.com Published On :: Sun, 03 May 2020 20:31:09 +0000 This special issue focuses on the impact COVID-19 is having on youth with diabetes and their families. Recorded April 30, 2020. This is a part of the American Diabetes Associations ongoing project providing resources for practicing clinicians on the care of Diabetes during the Covid-19 pandemic. Today’s discussion is an audio version of a webinar recorded on April 30, 2020. Presented by: Barry Conrad, MPH, RD, CDE Stanford Children's Health Tamara S. Hannon, MD, MS Indiana University Marisa Hilliard, PhD Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital Cynthia Munoz, PhD, MPH President-Elect, Helath Care & Education, American Diabetes Association Jennifer Raymond, MD, MCR Children's Hospital Los Angelas Full Article
science and technology Diabetes Core Update – May 2019 By diabetescoreupdate.libsyn.com Published On :: Tue, 05 May 2020 11:06:57 +0000 Diabetes Core Update is a monthly podcast that presents and discusses the latest clinically relevant articles from the American Diabetes Association’s four science and medical journals – Diabetes, Diabetes Care, Clinical Diabetes, and Diabetes Spectrum. Each episode is approximately 20 minutes long and presents 5-6 recently published articles from ADA journals. Intended for practicing physicians and health care professionals, Diabetes Core Update discusses how the latest research and information published in journals of the American Diabetes Association are relevant to clinical practice and can be applied in a treatment setting. This issue will review: Incidence and Risk Factors for Chronic Kidney Disease in the Community Efficacy and Safety of Liraglutide 3.0 mg in Individuals With Overweight or Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Basal Insulin Initial Glycemic Control and Care Among Adults Diagnosed With Type 2 Diabetes at a Younger Age Treatment and prevention of severe hypoglycaemia: Current and new formulations of glucagon – Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism Long-term Effects of Metformin on Patients With Type 2 Diabetic Kidney Disease Breakfast skipping is associated with persistently increased arterial stiffness in patients with type 2 diabetes – BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care For more information about each of ADA’s science and medical journals, please visit www.diabetesjournals.org. Presented by: Neil Skolnik, M.D., Professor of Family and Community Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University; Associate Director, Family Medicine Residency Program, Abington Jefferson Health John J. Russell, M.D., Professor of Family and Community Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University; Director, Family Medicine Residency Program, Chair-Department of Family Medicine, Abington Jefferson Health Full Article
science and technology A very exciting web site along with terrific posts! By investing.96.lt Published On :: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 19:35:49 UTC This is one of the best intriguing sites I have ever before seen. That is actually quite exciting due to its unique subject matter and outstanding write-ups. That likewise provides some wonderful resources. Inspect that our and also find for on your own! Full Article Computer and Technology
science and technology Cheapest Web Hosting India By investing.96.lt Published On :: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 07:45:05 UTC If you have lack of knowledge about web hosting, then you ,must read this blog, here you will get every detailed information regarding the web hosting , Linux hosting or windows hosting. You can find best up to your knowledge here, all about cheap web hosting is mentioned and how to find best and cheapest hosting plans according to your needs. Full Article Computer and Technology
science and technology IOS app Development Company in Gurgaon By investing.96.lt Published On :: Tue, 16 May 2017 13:00:08 UTC Appslure is the best iOS apps development company in Delhi, Gurgaon, Noida, Mumbai, India. Our iOS app developers are expert in responsive iphone and iPad app development services. Full Article Computer and Technology
science and technology Android app Development Company in Noida By investing.96.lt Published On :: Tue, 16 May 2017 13:02:04 UTC We are Award Winning Multinational Android app development Delhi based Company. Our Highly Expert team of Android Developers have 4+ Years of experience. Full Article Computer and Technology
science and technology thor's hammer By investing.96.lt Published On :: Sat, 24 Jun 2017 14:51:40 UTC thor's hammerthor's hammerthor's hammerthor's hammerthor's hammerthor's hammerthor's hammerthor's hammerthor's hammerthor's hammerthor's hammerthor's hammerthor's hammerthor's hammer Full Article Computer and Technology
science and technology Free Employee Review Template and Software By investing.96.lt Published On :: Thu, 07 Dec 2017 14:22:34 UTC All organizations need simple and effective employee reviews with 360 degree options. Teamphoria completely replaces paper and spreadsheet based employee reviews Template and Software. Full Article Computer and Technology
science and technology Unlocking Finance for Clean Energy: The Need for 'Investment Grade' Policy By feedproxy.google.com Published On :: Mon, 09 May 2011 07:50:50 +0000 1 December 2009 Kirsty Hamilton Associate Fellow, Energy, Environment and Resources Programme LinkedIn As the international community looks to the period beyond the UN Copenhagen agreements on climate change, attention is focusing on the finance for implementing global emissions reductions on the ground. The requirement for significantly scaled-up investment into the solutions to climate change is a central issue, often characterized as investment flows into 'low carbon technologies'.This paper draws on five years of insights from mainstream financiers leading the exponential growth in renewable energy investment, and key issues for policy-makers seeking to foster conditions for even greater investment are identified. Related documents Programme Paper - Unlocking Finance for Clean Energypdf | 320.15 KB Department/project Energy, Environment and Resources Programme Full Article
science and technology Earth Observation, Risk Assessment and Global Change: Implications for the Insurance and Aerospace Sectors By feedproxy.google.com Published On :: Fri, 20 May 2011 13:17:51 +0000 Research Event 16 July 2008 - 2:00pm to 5:15pm Chatham House, London Conference Agenda: Earth Observation, Risk Assessment and Global Changepdf | 60.78 KB This event is organized by Chatham House and the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).Keynote speaker:Lindene Patton, Climate Product Officer, Zurich Financial ServicesOther speaker highlights:Alexis Livanos, Northrop GrummanSir David King, University of OxfordBarend Van Bergen, KPMGMike Keebaugh,RaytheonPeter Stott, UK Met OfficeTrevor Maynard, Lloyd'sShree Khare, Risk Management SolutionsGiovanni Rum, Group on Earth ObservationsGreg Withee, US National Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationMan Cheung, Marsh Ltd Full Article
science and technology Carbon Capture and Storage: Panacea or Procrastination? By feedproxy.google.com Published On :: Fri, 20 May 2011 13:35:25 +0000 Research Event 14 September 2009 - 12:00am to 11:00pm Chatham House, London Event participants Dr Jon Gibbins, Senior Lecturer in the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College LondonJim Footner, Senior Climate Change Campaigner, Greenpeace Carbon capture and storage (CCS) has risen up the political agenda both nationally and internationally as a part of the effort to reduce CO2 emissions in power generation yet the applications, potential and impacts of this technology remain contested.Is CCS - employed to produce low-carbon electricity and hydrogen - the panacea we urgently need to limit cumulative CO2 emissions to a level at which we stand a chance of avoiding dangerous climate change (and possibly also a renaissance in global nuclear fission)? Or does it shift the emphasis away from switching to more a sustainable renewable energy infrastructure that could avoid the use of fossil fuels and nuclear altogether?In this meeting two leading voices in the debate give their opinions, separating the known from the unknown and kick starting an informed discussion about the pros, cons and politics of CCS.Please note that attendance is by invitation only and there is a maximum of 25 places. This meeting is part of the Chatham House Fossil Fuels Expert Roundtable. Event attributes All-day event Full Article
science and technology Is Europe Ready for Another Ash Shock? By feedproxy.google.com Published On :: Tue, 24 May 2011 14:39:37 +0000 24 May 2011 Bernice Lee OBE Research Director; Executive Director, Hoffmann Centre for Sustainable Resource Economy @BerniceWLee The eruption of another Icelandic volcano this week, ejecting ash plume into the atmosphere, reminds us afresh of Europe's vulnerability to 'low probability, high impact' events. Will Europe respond better this time? A forthcoming Chatham House Report shows that in such crises our governments and global businesses are in a better place to cope for a week - but no longer. This is because the full consequences of worst case scenarios are rarely factored in.The ash cloud in 2010 is estimated to have cost the EU around $ 5-10 billion - the airlines bore about $ 1.7 billion in lost revenues and the tourism industry was hit hard. The greatest impact felt by many organisations was in human resources - the absence of stranded employees and dislocated management structures - but some companies fared better than others having learnt lessons from 9/11, SARS and other shocks to aviation. Businesses responding to a Chatham House survey on the impact of the ash cloud said that if the ash event last year had persisted just a few more days there would have been far more serious consequences.This is not surprising given our dependence on long supply chains and the just-in-time business model. Since the earthquake and tsunami in March, for example, Japanese national infrastructure has been struggling to cope with fraying supply-chains and significantly slowed production. Carmakers and mobile phone manufacturers across the world were forced to halt or slow production as inventories of essential products - electronic components, car parts and fine chemicals - were quickly run down. Major cities for production, trade and travel are often badly affected by any international shocks, irrespective of the source, rendering the apparent resilience of having multiple suppliers meaningless.A major scenario planning exercise conducted by Eurocontrol, five weeks ago suggests that the EU might be better prepared for an ash cloud disruption than a year ago. A key test for Europe now lies in whether member states will succeed in working together better in coordinating responses to ash threat and building public confidence in science-based risk management and planning.Policy-makers face again the challenge of communicating a complex problem to a frustrated public. The ash cloud last year demonstrated the complication of crisis management in the media-saturated world, where opinion can be swayed by the most audible, the most active or the most politically powerful voices rather than the best informed or the most legitimate. There are important lessons here on the advantages and potential pitfalls of engaging stakeholders and the public via social and online media.Our forthcoming report also shows a bias in the traditional media towards industry voices rather than those of the scientific community and policy-makers. During the crisis last year, there was scant public defence of the precautionary principles or safety, merely airlines duelling through the airwaves to step up pressure to remove the flight ban. First off the gate, Ryanair had already started its public relations battle last night. This time around, let's hope that traditional media will give greater airplay to voices beyond industry commentators, including scientists and experts. In-depth explanations of the science and technology involved in an event can help people assess the levels of uncertainty and risk involved in a situation, and what it means for them. Full Article
science and technology How to Manage Ash Clouds By feedproxy.google.com Published On :: Wed, 25 May 2011 21:03:26 +0000 23 May 2011 Felix Preston Former Senior Research Fellow and Deputy Research Director, Energy, Environment and Resources The Eyjafjallajökull ash cloud of 2010 exposed serious weaknesses in the ability of governments across Europe to prepare for an aviation crisis and implement effective responses.One year on considerable efforts have been made to improve scientific understanding, reform the risk management approach and improve coordination at the European level. A major scenario exercise in April this year even took Grimsvötn - the volcano now erupting - as its case study. Successful management of this eruption would have five characteristics:European countries take a consistent approachIn 2010, European countries made different decisions, based on the same scientific advice, leading to widespread confusion. This is the first test of a new set of guidelines which allows planes to fly in low and medium concentrations of ash, and puts much of the risk assessment decision-making in the hands of the airlines. Ultimately, the responsibility for aviation safety remains with individual countries. Yet a single Europe-wide system for submitting the safety assessments is not yet in place, and Eurocontrol has confirmed that some European states are not yet ready to implement the new approach - especially those who did not take part in the recent scenario exercise.Decision-making is decisive and transparent at European levelLast time round, European-level organisations took a back seat for nearly a week. A clear structure of decision making across key bodies must emerge if public confidence in decision making is to be maintained - including Eurocontrol, the European Aviation Safety Agency and the European Commission. Coordination will be undertaken through the European Aviation Crisis Coordination Cell (EACCC), an emergency mechanism that has been activated for the first time since Eyjafjallajökull. Transparency at European level is another key test. The detailed remit and composition of the EACCC - including the level of industry participation - remains cloudy.The aviation industry supports the best available scientific informationThe accuracy of Met Office ash maps was a major point of contention between airlines and engine manufacturers on the one hand, and aviation safety regulators on the other. A new ash measuring station in Iceland (still undergoing calibration) and refinements to the modelling has reduced uncertainty, but this can never be an exact science. Tension should have been reduced by the shift of responsibility towards airlines.Governments provide clear information to the publicScientific and technology uncertainty is notoriously difficult to communicate, especially when it comes to articulating risks and probability. Yet this is crucial to maintain public confidence in evidence-based decision making. During the last crisis, there was scant public defence of the precautionary principles or safety.Governments also failed to establish a clear public understanding of passengers' rights when flights are delayed. Instead the media discourse was dominated by airlines duelling through the airwaves to step up pressure to remove the flight ban. Already, it is clear that stakeholders have chosen very different media strategies to last time - notably Eurocontrol which has been lauded online for its activity on social media.The knock-on consequences of the disruption are managed effectivelyA prolonged disruption to aviation would have widespread economic and social impacts. How to manage these impacts has received much less attention over the last twelve months than the issue of when to fly in ash. If Grimsvötn erupts for longer than currently anticipated, similar challenges for cross-border transport management will emerge, followed by questions about appropriate state support for struggling businesses. Full Article
science and technology Throw nothing away. It's time to upcycle By feedproxy.google.com Published On :: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:21:16 +0000 1 April 2012 , Volume 68, Number 2 In the circular economy nothing is wasted. Repair, not replace, is the byword. Felix Preston on a 30-year-old idea whose day is about to dawn Felix Preston Former Senior Research Fellow and Deputy Research Director, Energy, Environment and Resources Preston.jpg Photo: AP Photo/Keystone, Walter Bieri Full Article
science and technology Climate Change 2012 By feedproxy.google.com Published On :: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:09:19 +0000 Conference Security, resilience and diplomacy 15 October 2012 - 9:30am to 16 October 2012 - 5:00pm Chatham House, London Overview Speakers Press registration Sponsors Media partners Venue and accommodation Agenda The 16th Annual Chatham House conference on climate change will assess what national and international actions must be taken now to manage 21st century climate security challenges. Although disunity remains over how to manage the climate challenge, there is agreement that action is now needed to adapt to the impacts of climate change that can no longer be prevented and to build resilience against the impact of extreme climate events.The conference will examine the key economic, social and geo-political security threats caused by climate change and debate what national and international responses are required to manage these security challenges.Key issues that will be addressed include:What will be the impact of climate change on border shifts, migration, health, security of critical infrastructure and competition for natural resources?Is there a role for geoengineering in managing climate? If so, what would be the impact on international climate action?What has been achieved between Durban and Doha and what are the goals for the 2012 UN talks?How will essential climate change mitigation and adaptation be financed?Suggested Twitter hashtag: #CHClimate Rt Hon Edward DaveySecretary of State for Energy and Climate ChangeChristiana FigueresExecutive SecretaryConnie HedegaardEuropean Commissioner for Climate ActionDieter Helm CBEProfessor of Energy PolicyGraham van’t HoffChairman and Executive Vice President, CO2 and Alternative EnergiesThe Honourable Peter KentMinister of the EnvironmentDr David N BreschHead Sustainability & Political Risk ManagementViktor ElblingDirector General for Economic Affairs and Sustainable DevelopmentAntony FroggattSenior Research Fellow, Energy, Environment and Resource GovernanceRichard GledhillGlobal Leader, Climate Change and Carbon Market ServicesProfessor Michael GrubbSenior Research Associate, Faculty of EconomicsProfessor Debarati Guha-SapirDirectorProfessor Zhang HaibinSchool of International StudiesShahidul HaqueFormer Director, International Cooperation and PartnershipAmbassador Richard H JonesDeputy Executive DirectorBernice LeeResearch Director, Energy, Environment and Resources GovernanceNick MabeyChief ExecutiveOliver MortonBriefings EditorProfessor Virginia MurrayHead of Extreme EventsRichard MyungiVice President's Office, Division of Environment, TanzaniaCleo PaskalAssociate Research FellowDr Steve RaynerDirectorDr David SantilloChief ScientistDr Jamie SheaDeputy Assistant Secretary General, Emerging Security Challenges DivisionDan Smith OBESecretary GeneralJack StilgoeSenior Lecturer, Science and Technology StudiesThomas StockerProfessor of Climate and Environmental Physics, University of Bern, Switzerland and This conference will be held under the Chatham House Rule. Information for journalistsPress can request a press pass using the form below. If you are interested in becoming a sponsor for this event, please contact Simone Roberts. VenueChatham Houseconferences@chathamhouse.org Telephone: +44 (0)20 7957 5729Fax: +44 (0)20 7957 5710If you wish to book the venue for your event please phone +44 (0)20 7314 2764Conference UnitChatham House10 St James's SquareLondonSW1Y 4LEUK AccommodationAlthough we cannot book accommodation for delegates, we have arranged a reduced rate at some nearby hotels, where you can book your own accommodation. Please inform the hotel that you will be attending a conference at Chatham House (The Royal Institute of International Affairs) to qualify for the Institute's reduced rate.Please note all rates are subject to availability.Flemings MayfairHalf Moon StreetMayfairLondon W1Y 7RATel: + 44 (0)20 7499 2964Fax: + 44 (0)20 7499 1817Standard Single £180 + VATThe Cavendish London81 Jermyn StreetLondonSW1U 6JFTel: + 44 (0)20 7930 2111Fax: + 44 (0)20 7839 2125Standard Single £200 + VATTo book The Cavendish onlineThe Stafford London by KempinskiSt James's PlaceLondon SW1A 1NJTel: 020 7518 1125 Fax: 020 7493 7121Standard Single £230 +VAT Day One, Monday 15 OctoberClimate Risk: The ScienceWhat are the current climate impacts and which regions are most affected?What are current long term climate forecasts? What temperature rise is the world realistically on track for?What will be the impact of a 2˚ degree increase in temperatures on sea levels, weather patterns, and frequency and severity of high impact weather events? On food and water security?What would be the impact on these of a 4˚ increase in temperature?09.30 ChairBernice Lee OBEResearch Director, Energy, Environment and ResourcesChatham HouseProfessor Thomas StockerCo-Chair WGIIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Questions & discussion10.00 Keynote Speaker (on the record)Connie HedegaardEuropean Commissioner for Climate ActionEuropean CommissionQuestions & discussionSession OneSecurity and Climate ChangeWhat will be the greatest national and international challenges arising from climate change?Examining the key issues about extreme events, disasters and climate change outlined in the IPCC Special Report for Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation (SREX)What the UK is doing on the Climate Change Risk AssessmentTo what extent do health, social, economic and critical infrastructural assets need to be adapted to respond to these emerging threats? How should countries be preparing for the increased potential for climate related conflict?Chair Cleo PaskalAssociate FellowChatham House10.30 SpeakersCleo PaskalDan Smith OBESecretary GeneralInternational AlertProf Virginia MurrayHead of Extreme EventsHealth Protection Agency, UKQuestions and discussion11.50 - 12.20 RefreshmentsSession TwoInternational Climate Change PolicyWhat progress has there been on key points in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) process after the 2011 Durban meeting and before Doha in 2012?What new alignments have emerged from the international climate talks?What are the proposed approaches for enhancing mitigation ambition?What are the key outcomes from the first session of the Ad Hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action?How effective is carbon trading as a tool for reducing global carbon emissions?Chair Bernice Lee OBEResearch Director, Energy, Environment and ResourcesChatham House12.20 Keynote Speaker (on the record)Christiana FigueresExecutive SecretaryUNFCCCQuestions & discussion12.50 Keynote Discussion (on the record)The Honourable Peter KentMinister of the EnvironmentCanada Graham van’t HoffChairman Shell UKExecutive Vice President, CO2 and Alternative EnergiesDieter Helm CBEProfessor of Energy PolicyUniversity of Oxford13.30 Lunch14.30 Keynote Speaker (on the record)Rt Hon Edward DaveySecretary of StateDepartment of Energy and Climate Change, UKQuestions & discussionSession ThreeTechnology, Public Attitudes, Energy and Climate ChangeEnergy production and use is responsible for the largest share of the increase in greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. Consequently, energy remains the main focus of public policy and media attention on climate change, but despite this significant parts of the public are confused as to the impacts of different technologies and their own roles and responsibilities.What are the different CO2 mitigation technologies and strategies being considered nationally and internationally? How viable are different approaches and what are the funding models?To what extent will public attitudes towards different CO2 mitigation strategies drive energy policy?How does the media influence public attitudes and behavior?Chair Richard GledhillPartner, Global Leader Climate ChangePricewaterhouseCoopers15.00 SpeakersAmbassador Richard H. JonesDeputy Executive DirectorInternational Energy AgencyAntony FroggattSenior Research Fellow, Energy, Environment and Resource GovernanceChatham HouseProfessor Michael GrubbSenior Research Associate, Faculty of EconomicsUniversity of CambridgeQuestions and discussion15.50-16.20 RefreshmentsSession FourA Radical SolutionCould geoengineering be a useful tool for moderating climate change?How viable is geo engineering as a strategy for controlling climate? What are the scientific concerns around manipulation of the world’s ecosystem?What are the key policy responses towards geo-engineering techniques for manipulating the climate?How realistic are fears that geoengineering could be weaponized and how could this issue be tackled?Will geoengineering be used as a justification of continuation of business as usual?Panel DiscussionModeratorOliver MortonBriefings EditorThe Economist16.20 PanelistsDr Jack StilgoeSenior Lecturer, Department of Science and Technology StudiesUniversity College LondonDr Steve RaynerDirectorInstitute for Science, Innovation and SocietyDr David SantilloChief ScientistGreenpeace17.20 End of day one and drinks reception hosted by Chatham House DAY TWOTuesday 16 OctoberSession FiveNational Action on Climate and Security ImplicationsThis session will examine the extent to which extent political and business leaders are focusing on climate related security issues at national level.What actions do cities and countries need to take to ensure that critical infrastructure including transport, energy, water and IT remain protected from the threats associated with rising sea levels and flooding?How should health services strengthen capabilities to assess, plan for and respond to current and projected climate related threats?What further resilience measures do countries need to invest in? How should governments balance the costs of resilience with the costs of response, and who should pay?How can the private sector be engaged in improving national resilience and developing adaptation strategies?09.30 ChairCleo PaskalAssociate FellowChatham House SpeakersProf Zhang HaibinSchool of International StudiesPeking UniversityProf Debarati Guha-SapirDirectorWHO Collaborating Centre for Research on Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED) Dr David N BreschHead of SustainabilitySwiss Reinsurance Company LtdQuestions and discussion10.45-11.15 Refreshments Session SixAdapting to a Changing WorldStrategic responses to climate change at international levelThis session will assess the requirements and challenges of coordinating international responses to climate threats. What adaptive strategies are being explored and how will they be financed?How can governments and business minimize global disruption from ‘black swan’ climate events?What effective regional initiatives for regional and global resilience and security are in place?How much investment in adaptation is needed, and where will funding come from?What is the role of the private sector in funding adaptation activities?What is the role for international climate and resource policy and diplomacy?11.15 ChairNick MabeyChief ExecutiveE3GPanel DiscussionBernice LeeResearch Director, Energy, Environment and Resources GovernanceChatham HouseShahidul HaqueFormer Director, International Cooperation and PartnershipInternational Organization for Migration (IOM)Viktor ElblingDirector General for Economic Affairs and Sustainable DevelopmentGerman Federal Foreign OfficeRichard MyungiVice President's Office, Division of Environment, Tanzaniaand first Chairman and LDC Board Member, Global Climate Change Adaptation FundDr. Jamie SheaDeputy Assistant Secretary General, Emerging Security Challenges DivisionNATO Questions and discussion13.00 Lunch and end of conference© The Royal Institute of International Affairs, 2012 Full Article
science and technology Green Living By feedproxy.google.com Published On :: Wed, 30 May 2012 16:28:20 +0000 1 June 2012 , Volume 68, Number 3 Thought you were doing all the right things to help the planet? Read on Agnes Frimston 5Things1.jpg Illustration: James Sillavan Full Article
science and technology Graphic showing the role of satellite images in tracking environmental damage By feedproxy.google.com Published On :: Thu, 31 May 2012 16:35:16 +0000 1 June 2012 , Volume 68, Number 4 Eyes in the skies keeping watch on a planet under stress. Click on the PDF link to view the graphic Graphic EyesInTheSkies.jpg Full Article
science and technology The UK's Vision for Tackling Climate Change By feedproxy.google.com Published On :: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 09:32:40 +0000 1 July 2012 Chatham House This is a transcript of a speech made by Ed Davey MP, Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, on 11 July 2012 at Chatham House.In his first keynote speech on the subject, the Secretary of State outlined his vision for ambitious action on climate change.Event details. Related documents Transcript - Ed Davey MPpdf | 110.21 KB Department/project Energy, Environment and Resources Programme Full Article
science and technology Mainstreaming the environment into post-war recovery: the case for 'ecological development' By feedproxy.google.com Published On :: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 10:43:22 +0000 7 September 2012 , Volume 88, Number 5 Richard Milburn Full Article
science and technology Sustainability After Rio+20: Working Towards Global Governance By feedproxy.google.com Published On :: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 10:59:42 +0000 Director's Breakfast Briefing 5 October 2012 - 8:00am to 9:15am Chatham House, London Event participants James Bacchus, Chair, Global Agenda Council on Governance for Sustainability, World Economic Forum; Chair, Appellate Body, World Trade Organization (1995-2003); Chair, Global Practice, Greenberg Taurig LLP In the aftermath of the recent Rio+20 conference, James Bacchus will discuss the potential for establishing new trade, investment and other international rules and arrangements to promote sustainable growth. In particular, he will explore the interconnections and the international arrangements relating to food, energy, water, climate and other issues affecting global sustainable development.Attendance is strictly by invitation only. To enable as open a debate as possible, this event will be held under the Chatham House Rule.About Director's Breakfast Briefings. Full Article
science and technology Delivering Concrete Climate Change Action By feedproxy.google.com Published On :: Tue, 14 May 2013 11:06:32 +0000 Conference Towards 2015 21 October 2013 - 9:30am to 22 October 2013 - 3:30pm Chatham House, London Overview Speakers Press registration Sponsors Media partners Venue and accommodation Agenda Audience profile Over the past five years, the political conditions for a global agreement on climate change have shifted. There is today growing consensus that responding to a changing climate will require multi-level collaboration and new alliances. In the run-up to the deadline for a new international climate change agreement in 2015, the 17th Annual Chatham House Conference on Climate Change will focus on workable solutions that will help accelerate global decarbonization. This conference will ask:What will a global deal in 2015 look like? What are the key components of a shared vision? What elements do developing and developed countries need in order to reach agreement?How can the emerging international climate change regime – comprising voluntary partnerships, formal negotiations and business coalitions – deliver the necessary reductions in greenhouse gas emissions?To what extent will new energy realities affect the politics of climate change?What practical lessons can be learned from existing carbon mitigation and adaptation policies?How can the international community harness progressive leadership?Registration Michael AndersonChief Executive OfficerThe Rt Hon Gregory Barker MPMinister of State for Energy and Climate ChangeFrances BeineckePresidentTim BentonUK Champion for Global Food Security and Professor of Population EcologySam BickerstethChief ExecutiveTony De BrumMinister-in-Assistance to the PresidentGiles DicksonVP Environmental Policies and Global AdvocacyReid DetchonVice President, Energy and ClimateAlfred EvansChief Executive OfficerChristiana FigueresExecutive SecretaryMarcin KorolecMinister of Environment, PolandKate HamptonExecutive Director, Climate ChangeCameron HepburnProfessor of environmental economics, Smith School and INET at Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, andDavid HoneClimate Change AdvisorPa Ousman JarjuSpecial Envoy for Climate ChangeSir David KingForeign Secretary’s Special Representative for Climate ChangeMartin KhorDirectorJohan KuylenstiernaDeputy-Director, Stockholm Environment InstituteJames LeatonProject DirectorBernice LeeResearch Director, Energy, Environment and ResourcesNick MabeyChief Executive OfficerAmina MohammedSpecial Adviser on Post-2015 Development PlanningJennifer MorganDirector of the Climate and Energy ProgramAdmiral Neil MorisettiForeign Secretary’s Special Representative for Climate ChangeMutsuyoshi NishimuraVisiting Research Fellow, Japan Institute of International affairsDr Atiur RahmanGovernorJohn SchellnhuberFounding DirectorTodd SternSpecial Envoy for Climate ChangeKelly RiggExecutive DirectorLaurence TubianaDirectorFraser ThompsonSenior FellowDominic WaughraySenior Director and Head of Environmental InitiativesFarhana YaminAssociate Fellow This conference will be held under the Chatham House Rule. Information for journalists Press can request a press pass using the form below. If you are interested in becoming a sponsor for this event, please contact George Woodhams on +44 (0)20 7957 5732 or email gwoodhams@chathamhouse.org. VenueChatham House conferences@chathamhouse.org Telephone: +44 (0)20 7957 5729 Fax: +44 (0)20 7957 5710 If you wish to book the venue for your event please phone +44 (0)20 7314 2764 Conference Unit Chatham House 10 St James's Square London SW1Y 4LE UKAccommodationAlthough we cannot book accommodation for delegates, we have arranged a reduced rate at some nearby hotels, where you can book your own accommodation. Please inform the hotel that you will be attending a conference at Chatham House (The Royal Institute of International Affairs) to qualify for the Institute's reduced rate.Please note all rates are subject to availability.Flemings MayfairHalf Moon Street Mayfair London W1Y 7RA Tel: + 44 (0)20 7499 2964 Fax: + 44 (0)20 7499 1817 Standard Single £190 + VATThe Cavendish London81 Jermyn Street London SW1U 6JF Tel: + 44 (0)20 7930 2111 Fax: + 44 (0)20 7839 2125 Standard Single £205 + VATTo book The Cavendish onlineThe Stafford London by KempinskiSt James's PlaceLondonSW1A 1NJTel: 020 7518 1125Fax: 020 7493 7121Standard Single £230 +VAT Monday 21 October 2013Session OneBridging the Gap Between Science and Policy09:00 - 10:10What are the latest findings from climate science and the IPCC? Is the world on track for global decarbonisation? Is dangerous anthropogenic climate change avoidable?To what extent are future climate risks sufficiently incorporated into policy thinking or investment strategies?Welcome AddressBernice Lee, Research Director, Energy, Environment and Resources, Chatham HouseChairMichael Anderson, Chief Executive Officer, Children’s Investment Fund Foundation Keynote AddressProfessor Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, Founding Director, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)SpeakersProfessor Tim Benton, UK Champion for Global Food Security and Professor of Population Ecology, Leeds UniversitySir David King, Foreign Secretary’s Special Representative for Climate ChangeQuestions and Discussion10:10 - 10:40 RefreshmentsSession TwoGlobal Deal in 2015: Challenges and Prospects10:40 - 12:40What will a global deal in 2015 look like? Will there be specific targets or non-binding sets of approaches? What are the building blocks?What is the value and track record of different kind of climate initiatives? For example, how successful are formal agreements compared to voluntary partnerships; climate-driven aid; or business coalitions? What are the main functions and institutions of the evolving international climate regime? What is the role of the UNFCCC? Is reform an option given the timeframe? What is the role for groupings like the G20 or the G8?ChairBernice Lee, Research Director, Energy, Environment and Resources, Chatham House Keynote AddressesChristiana Figueres, Executive Secretary, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (on the record)Marcin Korolec, Minister of Environment, Poland and President, COP 19, UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)Questions and DiscussionSpeakersNick Mabey, Chief Executive Officer, E3GFarhana Yamin, Associate Fellow, Chatham House Laurence Tubiana, Director, The Institute for Sustainable Development and International Relations (IDDRI)Questions and Discussion1240 - 14:00 LunchChairBernice Lee, Research Director, Energy, Environment and Resources, Chatham HouseKeynote AddressGregory Barker, Minister of State for Energy and Climate Change, United Kingdom (on the record)Questions and DiscussionSession ThreeClimate-Resilient Development: Views from Developing Countries14:30 - 16:10What are the drivers of domestic climate action in developing countries?What do developing countries need from the international climate regime: e.g. with respect to finance, ‘loss and damage’ and disaster preparedness? How will the politics among developing countries evolve? Has the G77 been eclipsed by the emergence of BASIC and other developing country alliances?ChairSam Bickersteth, Chief Executive, The Climate and Development Knowledge Network (CDKN)Keynote AddressesDr Atiur Rahman, Governor, Bangladesh BankSenator Tony deBrum, Minister-in-Assistance to the President, Republic of Marshall IslandsQuestions and DiscussionSpeakersMartin Khor, Director, South Centre Pa Ousman Jarju, Special Envoy for Climate Change, Republic of the GambiaQuestions and Discussion16:10 - 16:30 RefreshmentsSession Four Preparing for 2015: The Role of Major Economies16:30 - 17:30Do countries have clear understandings of how climate risks will reshape their national interests? How will these risks affect other agendas e.g. future economic competitiveness, resource security, public health, foreign policy, or disaster preparedness?How will major countries manage competing domestic priorities when preparing their national positions in the run-up to 2015? What is the evolving trilateral US-China-EU dynamic? Can the EU provide the necessary leadership?Are national investment systems capable of scaling up financing to deliver climate action in key countries like US, EU, China and India?Chair Bernice Lee, Research Director, Energy, Environment and Resources, Chatham HouseSpeakersDavid Hone, Climate Change Adviser, ShellJennifer Morgan, Director of the Climate and Energy Program, World Resources Institute Rear Admiral Neil Morisetti, Foreign Secretary’s Special Representative for Climate Change, United KingdonMutsuyoshi Nishimura, Visiting Research Fellow, Japan Institute of International affairs and Former Special Adviser to the Cabinet in charge of Climate Change, Japan Questions and Discussion17:30 End of day one and drinks reception hosted by Chatham HouseDAY TWOTuesday 22 October 09:30 - 15:10Session FiveThe Changing Global Energy Landscape: Implications for Decarbonization09:30 - 10:45What are the implications of the ‘golden age of gas’? What will growing coal use in many developing economies mean for climate politics?What is the prospect for scaling up renewable investments – given the lessons learned vis-à-vis the scale, speed and cost of low carbon technologies over the past five years?What are the contributions of off-grid, distributive generation and other demand side measures like efficiency?ChairDavid Hone, Climate Change Adviser, ShellModerated Panel Discussion Reid Detchon, Vice President for Energy and Climate, United Nations FoundationGiles Dickson, Vice President, Environmental Policies & Global Advocacy, Alstom Antony Froggatt, Senior Research Fellow, Chatham HouseQuestions and Discussion10:45 - 11:15 RefreshmentsSession Six Climate Policy and Finance: The Emerging Toolkit11:15 - 12:30What is the track record of policies and measures to tackle CO2 emissions – from carbon markets, standards and subsidies removal to taxation? What is the progress on tackling non-CO2 greenhouse gases? The cost of climate impacts has been escalating. What are the emerging tools (e.g. disaster preparedness, climate-proof aid or insurance) for managing the impacts? What is the role of public versus private finance for different countries? What is the role of multilateral financing institutions in facilitating the increasingly large finance flows required?ChairCameron Hepburn, Professor of Environmental Economics, Smith School and INET at Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, and Professorial Research Fellow at the Grantham Research Institute at the LSESpeakersDr Johan Kuylenstierna, Deputy- Director, Stockholm Environment Institute, University of York Cameron Hepburn, Professor of environmental economics, Smith School and INET at Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, and Professorial Research Fellow at the Grantham Research Institute at the LSEJames Leaton, Project Director, Carbon Tracker Fraser Thompson, Senior Fellow, McKinsey Global InstituteQuestions and Discussion12:30 -13:30 Lunch13.:30 -14:00ChairBernice Lee, Research Director, Energy, Environment and Resources, Chatham HouseKeynote AddressTodd Stern, Special Envoy for Climate Change, United States Department of StateQuestions and DiscussionSession SevenBuilding the Progressive Conditions for 201514:00 - 15:10Can the international community harness progressive leadership – through coalitions of governments, businesses and/or NGOs? What are the political or mobilisation strategies needed to tackle domestic climate scepticism, build progressive coalitions and neutralise vested interests at different levels? What are the implications of the post-2015 development discussions for climate change? ChairDominic Waughray, Senior Director, Head of Environmental Initiatives, World Economic ForumModerated Panel DiscussionFrances Beinecke, President, Natural Resources Defense Council Alfred Evans, Chief Executive Officer, Climate Change CapitalKate Hampton, Executive Director, Climate Change, Children's Investment Fund Foundation Amina Mohammed, Special Adviser on Post-2015 Development Planning, United NationsQuestions and Discussion15:10 Close of Conference© The Royal Institute of International Affairs 2013 This conference will offer a unique opportunity to network with senior officials from businesses, government, NGO's and academic institutions.Our previous Climate Change conferences saw delegates from companies and institutions such as:AccentureAEA Energy & EnvironmentAgulhasArcelorMittalAssociation of Asia Pacific Airlines (AAPA)Atkins LtdBASF plcBayerngas Norge ASBeetle CapitalBG Group plcBHP BillitonBIRA-IASBBooz & CoBP plcBritish CouncilBT Group plcCairn Energy plcCambridge Centre for Energy StudiesCambridge Programme for Sustainable LeadershipCarbon Capture and Storage AssociationCarbon LeapfrogCarbon TrustCaritas InternationalisCatholic Fund for Overseas Development (CAFOD)CH2M HillChamber of ShippingChevron LtdChubu Electric Power Co IncClientEarthClifford Chance LLPClimate & Development Knowledge Network (CDKN)Climate Action Network (CAN)Climate and Health CouncilClimate SecureCoalition for an International Court for the Environment (ICE Coalition)Compassion in World Farming (CIWF)Conocophillips (UK) LtdControl RisksCo-operative GroupCranfield UniversityDeloitte Consulting LLPDepartment for Business, Innovation & Skills (BIS)Department for International Development (DFID)Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC)Ecofys UK LtdEcologic InstituteEDF EnergyEnergy Charter SecretariatEnergy Technologies InstituteEni S.p.AEnvironment AgencyEnvironmental Law Foundation (ELF)Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)Environmental Resources Management (ERM)ENWORKSErnst & YoungEthical Investment Research Services Ltd (EIRIS)European Bank For Reconstruction & DevelopmentEuropean Commission (Directorate General for Enterprise and Industry)European ParliamentExxonMobil International LtdFauna & Flora InternationalFIA Foundation for the Automobile and SocietyFinnish Forest AssociationForeign and Commonwealth Office (FCO)Forestry CommissionFriends of the EarthGenesis Investment Management LLPGLG Partners LPGlobal CCS InstituteGlobal Humanitarian ForumGlobal Sustainability InstituteGlobal WitnessGlobeleq LtdGrantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, LSEGreater Manchester Chamber of CommerceGreenpeace InternationalHerbert Smith Freehills LLPHM TreasuryImperial College LondonINPEX CorporationInstitute for Public Policy Research (IPPR)Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change (IIGCC)International Association of Oil & Gas ProducersInternational Council on Mining and MetalsInternational Finance Corporation (IFC)International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED)International Organization for Standardization (ISO)Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO)Joseph Rowntree FoundationJPMorganKing's College LondonKPMGKuwait Petroleum CorporationLondon AssemblyLondon Metropolitan UniversityLondon School of Economics and Political Science (LSE)Maersk GroupMassey UniversityMcKinsey & CompanyMETREXMinistere des Affaires Etrangeres, FranceMinistry of Defence (Development, Concepts and Doctrine Centre)Ministry of Foreign Affairs, NetherlandsMinistry of Foreign Affairs, FinlandMinistry of Foreign Affairs, PolandMinistry of Infrastructure and the EnvironmentMitsubishi CorporationNational Farmers' UnionNational Round Table on the Environment and the EconomyNetherlands Development Finance Company (FMO)NEXUS SingaporeOffice of National AssessmentsOgilvyOpen Society FoundationOverseas Development Institute (ODI)Oxford UniversityPlan UKPricewaterhouseCoopers LLPPrivy Council OfficeProgressioQuaker Peace and Social WitnessQuébec Government OfficeRenewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Partnership (REEEP)Renewable Energy Systems Ltd (RES)Rolls-Royce International LtdRWE Power AGSave the Children UKSCA, Svenska Cellulosa AktiebolagetSchool of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS)Standard Chartered Bank plcStatoil (UK) LtdSustainAbility LtdSwedish Defence Research Agency (FOI)Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation SDCTask ConsultTexas A&M UniversityThe 40 FoundationThe Climate GroupThe Gold Standard FoundationThe Norwegian Institute for Nature ResearchThe Open UniversityThe Prince of Wales Corporate Leader GroupThe Royal SocietyThe Saudi Fund For DevelopmentTokyo Electric Power CompanyTotal Holdings UK LtdUK Chamber of ShippingUK Collaborative on Development Sciences (UKCDS)United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)University College London (UCL)University of CambridgeUniversity of East Anglia (School of Environmental Sciences)University of EdinburghUniversity of Oxford (Department of Politics and International Relations)US Department of StateUSAIDWarwick Business SchoolWaterAidWorld Coal AssociationWorld Coal InstituteWorld Economic ForumWorld Society for the Protection of Animals (WSPA)World Vision UKWWF-UKXynteo LtdYorkshire Forward Full Article
science and technology Tonga Energy Road Map: Energy Security, the Aid Paradigm, and Pacific Geostrategy By feedproxy.google.com Published On :: Thu, 23 May 2013 13:00:07 +0000 Research Event 3 June 2013 - 2:00pm to 4:00pm Chatham House, London Event participants Lord Tu'ivakano, Prime Minister of the Kingdom of Tonga Lord Tu'ivakano, will deliver a keynote address on the development of the Tonga Energy Road Map (TERM), which plans for 50% of the country's energy to come from renewable energy sources by 2020. The Kingdom of Tonga is highly susceptible to both climate change as well as changes in global energy prices due to its high dependency on imported oil. The TERM has required both ground-breaking whole-of-sector institutional changes in Tonga as well as innovative coordination across a range of development partners, including the World Bank, ADB and the UN. Key players in the international community have closely watched the development and implementation of the TERM as it presents a complete change in the aid paradigm that is not just specific to Tonga, or the energy sector. Registration for this event has now closed. Department/project Energy, Environment and Resources Programme Full Article
science and technology Climate Change: Raising Ambition, Delivering Results By feedproxy.google.com Published On :: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 10:08:33 +0000 Conference 3 November 2014 - 9:30am to 4 November 2014 - 1:15pm Chatham House, London Overview Agenda Speakers Pricing Media partners Sponsors Audience profile Venue and accommodation Press registration Climate change is climbing the political agenda. Extreme weather has raised questions in public discourse about the role of anthropogenic warming and concerns about its future impacts; slowdowns in emerging economies and sluggish recoveries in the developed world mean debates about the impact of climate policies on energy bills and competitiveness have assumed particular significance. Against this background, governments are gearing up for a crucial series of agreements in 2015 with climate change at their core. The international community must agree new global sustainable development goals, a new framework on disaster risk reduction and, at the 21st UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) meeting of the Conference of Parties (COP 21) in Paris, a new global deal on climate change. The 18th Annual Chatham House Conference on Climate Change will take stock of developments in 2014, including the latest science, the findings of high-level commissions, initiatives from the business community and the UN Secretary-General’s High Level Summit at the end of September. Looking forward to COP 20 in Lima and beyond, this conference will examine opportunities to raise ambition and convert this into results.In particular, it will:Review the latest science on climate risk and the implications for business, society and politics Examine the benefits of a low carbon economy, and assess the costs of climate action and where they fall Discuss concrete measures to decarbonize key sectors and the barriers to action Identify the critical path to the UNFCCC’s Conference of the Parties (COP 21) in 2015, and look at whether, and how, support for ambitious action can be built among publics, business and politiciansThe Chatham House Rule To enable as open a debate as possible, this conference will be held under the Chatham House Rule.Twitter Suggested hashtag: #CHclimate DAY ONEMonday 3 NovemberSession One Taking Stock and Mapping the Road Ahead09:30-11:15What was achieved at the UN Secretary General’s High Level Summit in September? What is the outlook for COP 20 in Lima, and how can ambition be increased?How will success at COP 21 in Paris be defined?ChairRob Bailey, Acting Research Director, Energy, Environment and Resources, Chatham HouseKeynote AddressManuel Pulgar-Vidal, Minister of State for the Environment, Peru; President, COP 20, UN Framework for the Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (on the record)Amber Rudd MP, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, Department of Energy and Climate Change, United Kingdom (on the record)Questions and DiscussionChairJennifer Morgan, Director, Climate and Energy Programme, World Resources Institute (WRI) SpeakersSelwin Hart, Director, Secretary-General's Climate Change Support Team, United NationsDr Halldór Thorgeirsson, Director for Strategy, UN Framework for the Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)Leena Srivastava, Executive Director, The Energy and Resource Institute (TERI) Paul Watkinson, Head of Climate Negotiation Team, Ministry of Ecology, Sustainable Development and Energy, FranceQuestions and Discussion11:15-11:45 RefreshmentsSession TwoLow Carbon Economy: Costs and Benefits11:45-13:00 What are the economic and social opportunities and benefits of a low carbon economy? Where do these occur? How much are they worth?What are examples of leadership among governments and business? What is needed to accelerate the transition and translate ambition into results?What has been the impact of climate policies on economic competitiveness? Which economies and sectors have been most affected? How has this influenced national and international climate politics?Chair's Opening RemarksMarianne Fay, Chief Economist, Climate Change Group, The World BankKeynote Panel DiscussionJeremy Oppenheim, Programme Director, New Climate Economy, Global Commission on the Economy and Climate Jos Delbeke, Director General for Climate Action, European Commission Dr Qi Ye, Director, Brookings-Tsinghua Center for Public Policy; Professor of Environmental Policy and Management at Tsinghua University’s School of Public Policy and ManagementJeremy Bentham, Vice President, Global Business Environment, ShellQuestions and Discussion13:00-14:00 LunchSession Three Concrete Steps to Action: Finance and Achieving Net Zero There is growing interest in the concept of net zero carbon emissions, for businesses, sectors and even countries. This session will examine the feasibility of net zero for the power and transport sectors, and for buildings and cities.ChairShane Tomlinson, Senior Research Fellow, Energy, Environment and Resources, Chatham House Opening DiscussionManfred Konukiewitz, Co-Chair, the Green Climate Fund Matthew Kotchen, Professor of Economics, Yale University Farhana Yamin, Associate Fellow, Chatham HousePower and Transport14:45-15:45What do decarbonization roadmaps for the power and transport sectors look like? Is net zero feasible? If so, by when and how? What are the challenges posed by increasing renewable penetration, and how can they be managed? What are the implications of vehicle electrification for the power sector?What are the implications for infrastructure and investment?ChairShane Tomlinson, Senior Research Fellow, Energy, Environment and Resources, Chatham House SpeakersAbyd Karmali, Managing Director, Climate Finance, Bank of America Merrill LynchDries Acke, Policy Manager, European Climate Foundation (Belgium) Olivier Paturet, General Manager, Zero Emissions Strategy, Nissan EuropeStefan Raubenheimer, Co-Founder and Director, South South North; Co-Director, MAPS Programme Questions and Discussion15:45-16:15 RefreshmentsBuildings and Cities16:15-17:15What is the state of the art for low carbon building; how can this be rolled out at scale? How can decarbonization objectives be incorporated into urban planning and regulation?How are the challenges and needs different for developed and developing countries? ChairFarhana Yamin, Associate Fellow, Energy, Environment and Resources, Chatham HouseSpeakersEd Mazria, Founder and CEO, Architecture 2030Tony Mallows, Director, Masdar City Questions and Discussion17:15 Close of day and drinks receptionDAY TWOTuesday 4 NovemberSession Four Climate Impacts9:30-11:15 ChairSir David King, Foreign Secretary's Special Representative for Climate Change, United KingdomKeynote AddressesHE Belete Tafere, Minister, Ministry of Environment Protection and Forestry, Ethiopia (on the record)Professor Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, Founding Director, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (on the record)What climate impacts are already being witnessed? Are these in line with expectations? What is the current state of attribution analysis?What are the implications for climate politics?What are the expected social, economic and environmental impacts under different climate scenarios? What is the most recent science since the deadline for Working Group II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s Fifth Assessment Report? Which countries and sectors are most vulnerable? What are governments and businesses doing to adapt?ChairSir David King, Foreign Secretary's Special Representative for Climate Change, United KingdomSpeakersChris Field, Founding Director, Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution of Science, Co-Chair of Working Group II of the IPCC’s Fifth Assessment Report Professor Myles Allen, Leader of ECI Climate Research Programme and Professor of Geosystem Science, University of Oxford Nick Mabey, Director, E3G Oilver Bettis, Chair, Resource and Environment Board, Institute and Faculty of ActuariesQuestions and Discussion11:15 - 11.45 RefreshmentsSession FiveThe Conditions for Action 11:45 - 13:00What is the current state of public support for climate action? What shapes attitudes and beliefs? How does this vary by country? What can create political ambition, nationally and internationally?What role can different stakeholders play in catalysing climate action?What immediate obstacles need to be overcome and what lessons can be learned from recent success? ChairSimon Maxwell, Executive Chair, Climate Development Knowledge NetworkKeynote AddressBill McKibben, President and Co-Founder, 350.org (on the record)Panel DiscussionAntonio Hill, Executive Director, Global Campaign for Climate ActionMichael Jacobs, Senior Adviser on International Climate Policy, The Institute for Sustainable Development and International Relations Jennifer Morgan, Director, Climate and Energy Programme, World Resources Institute (WRI) Sergio Margulis, National Secretary of Sustainable Development, Secretariat of Strategic Affairs of the Presidency of Brazil Sir David King, Foreign Secretary's Special Representative for Climate Change, United KingdomQuestions and DiscussionClosing remarksRob Bailey, Acting Research Director, Energy, Environment and Resources, Chatham House 13:10 End of conference and lunch © The Royal Institute of International Affairs 2014 Keynote Speakers Jeremy Bentham Vice President, Global Business Environment, Shell Jos Delbeke Director General for Climate Action, European Commission Bill McKibben President and Co-Founder, 350.org Jeremy Oppenheim Programme Director, New Climate Economy, Global Commission on the Economy and Climate Manuel Pulgar-Vidal Minister of State for Environment, Peru; President COP20 Amber Rudd MP* Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, United Kingdom Professor Hans Joachim Schnellnhuber Founding Director, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research Belete Tafere Minister of Environment Protection and Forestry, Ethiopia Dr Qi Ye Director, Brookings-Tsinghua Center for Public Policy and Professor of Environmental Policy; Management at Tsinghua University’s School of Public Policy and Management Speakers Dries Acke Policy Manager, European Climate Foundation (Belgium) Myles Allen Coordinating Lead Author, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 °C; Professor of Geosystem Science, University of Oxford Oliver Bettis Chair, Institute and Faculty of Actuaries' Resource and Environment Board Marianne Fay Chief Economist, Climate Change Group, The World Bank Chris Field Founding Director, Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution of Science Selwin Hart Director, Secretary-General's Climate Change Support Team, United Nations Antonio Hill Executive Director, Global Campaign for Climate Action Michael Hogan Senior Adviser, Regulatory Assistance Project Professor Michael Jacobs Senior Adviser on International Climate Policy, The Institute for Sustainable Development and International Relations Abyd Karmali Managing Director, Climate Finance, Bank of America Merrill Lynch Sir David King Foreign Secretary’s Special Representative for Climate Change Manfred Konukiewitz Co-Chair, The Green Climate Fund Matthew Kotchen Professor of Economics, Yale University Nick Mabey Co-Founding Director and Chief Executive, E3G Antony Mallows Director, Masdar City Sergio Margulis National Secretary of Sustainable Development, Secretariat of Strategic Affairs of the Presidency, Brazil Simon Maxwell Executive Chairman, Climate and Development Knowledge Network Edward Mazria Founder and CEO, Architecture 2030 Jennifer Morgan Executive Director, Greenpeace International Olivier Paturet General Manager, Zero Emissions Strategy, Nissan Europe Stefan Raubenheimer Co-Founder and Director, South South North; Co-Director, MAPS Programme Jose-Manuel Sanoval Coordinator, Colombian Low Carbon Development Strategy (CLCDS) and Mitigation Action Plans and Scenarios (MAPS) Leena Srivastava Hony. Executive Director (Operations), The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI) Halldór Thorgeirsson Director for Strategy, UN Framework for the Convention on Climate Change Paul Watkinson Head of Climate Negotiation Team, Ministry of Ecology, Sustainable Development and Energy, France Farhana Yamin Associate Fellow, Energy, Environment and Resources Programme [node:event_chair] PricingFor any questions about rates, please call +44 (0)20 7314 2782. FULL RATEEXCL. VATINCL. VATMajor corporate member ratesAll organizations£595£714 Corporate member ratesCommercial organizations£1,295£1,554Government departments£775£930NGOs and academics£495£594Standard ratesCommercial organizations£1,445£1,734 Government departments£845£1,014NGOs and academics£550£660 This conference will offer a unique opportunity to network with senior officials from businesses, government, NGO's and academic institutions.Our previous Climate Change conferences saw delegates from companies and institutions such as:AccentureAEA Energy & EnvironmentAgulhasArcelorMittalAssociation of Asia Pacific Airlines (AAPA)Atkins LtdBank of America Merrill LynchBASF plcBayerngas Norge ASBeetle CapitalBG Group plcBHP BillitonBIRA-IASBBirdLifeBooz & CoBP plcBritish CouncilBT Group plcCAFODCairn Energy plcCambridge Centre for Energy StudiesCambridge Programme for Sustainable LeadershipCarbon Capture and Storage AssociationCarbon LeapfrogCarbon TrustCaritas InternationalisCatholic Fund for Overseas Development (CAFOD)CH2M HillChevron LtdChubu Electric Power Co IncCity of LondonClientEarthClifford Chance LLPClimate & Development Knowledge Network (CDKN)Climate Action Network (CAN)Climate and Health CouncilClimate SecureCoalition for an International Court for the Environment (ICE Coalition)Compassion in World Farming (CIWF)Conocophillips (UK) LtdControl RisksCo-operative GroupCranfield UniversityDeloitte Consulting LLPDepartment for Business, Innovation & Skills (BIS)Department for International Development (DFID)Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC)Ecofys UK LtdEcologic InstituteEDF EnergyEnergy Charter SecretariatEnergy Technologies InstituteEni S.p.AEnvironment AgencyEnvironmental Law Foundation (ELF)Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)Environmental Resources Management (ERM)ENWORKSErnst & YoungEthical Investment Research Services Ltd (EIRIS)European Bank For Reconstruction & DevelopmentEuropean Commission (Directorate General for Enterprise and Industry)European ParliamentExxonMobil International LtdFauna & Flora InternationalFIA Foundation for the Automobile and SocietyFinnish Forest AssociationForeign and Commonwealth Office (FCO)Forestry CommissionFriends of the EarthGenesis Investment Management LLPGLG Partners LPGlobal CCS InstituteGlobal Humanitarian ForumGlobal Sustainability InstituteGlobal WitnessGlobeleq LtdGrantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, LSEGreater Manchester Chamber of CommerceGreenpeace InternationalHerbert Smith Freehills LLPHM TreasuryImperial College LondonINPEX CorporationInstitute for Public Policy Research (IPPR)Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change (IIGCC)International Association of Oil & Gas ProducersInternational Council on Mining and MetalsInternational Finance Corporation (IFC)International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED)International Organization for Standardization (ISO)Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO)Joseph Rowntree FoundationJPMorganKing's College LondonKPMGKuwait Petroleum CorporationLondon AssemblyLondon Metropolitan UniversityLondon School of Economics and Political Science (LSE)Maersk GroupMassey UniversityMcKinsey & CompanyMet OfficeMETREXMinistere des Affaires Etrangeres, FranceMinistry of Defence (Development, Concepts and Doctrine Centre)Ministry of Foreign Affairs, NetherlandsMinistry of Foreign Affairs, FinlandMinistry of Foreign Affairs, PolandMinistry of Infrastructure and the EnvironmentMitsubishi CorporationNational Farmers' UnionNational Round Table on the Environment and the EconomyNetherlands Development Finance Company (FMO)NEXUS SingaporeNordic CouncilOffice of National AssessmentsOgilvyOpen Society FoundationOverseas Development Institute (ODI)Oxford UniversityPlan UKPricewaterhouseCoopers LLPPrivy Council OfficeProgressioQuaker Peace and Social WitnessQuébec Government OfficeRenewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Partnership (REEEP)Renewable Energy Systems Ltd (RES)Rolls-Royce International LtdRWE Power AGSave the Children UKSCA, Svenska Cellulosa AktiebolagetSchool of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS)ShellStandard Chartered Bank plcStatoil (UK) LtdSustainAbility LtdSwedish Defence Research Agency (FOI)Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation SDCTask ConsultTexas A&M UniversityThe 40 FoundationThe Climate GroupThe Gold Standard FoundationThe Norwegian Institute for Nature ResearchThe Open UniversityThe Prince of Wales Corporate Leader GroupThe Royal SocietyThe Saudi Fund For DevelopmentTokyo Electric Power CompanyTotal Holdings UK LtdUK Chamber of ShippingUK Collaborative on Development Sciences (UKCDS)United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)University College London (UCL)University of CambridgeUniversity of East Anglia (School of Environmental Sciences)University of EdinburghUniversity of Oxford (Department of Politics and International Relations)US Department of StateUSAIDWarwick Business SchoolWaterAidWorld Coal AssociationWorld Coal InstituteWorld Economic ForumWorld Society for the Protection of Animals (WSPA)World Vision UKWWF-UKXynteo LtdYorkshire Forward VenueChatham House10 St James's SquareLondonSW1Y 4LEUKconferences@chathamhouse.orgTelephone: +44 (0)20 7957 5729Fax: +44 (0)20 7957 5710If you wish to book the venue for your event please phone +44 (0)20 7314 2764DirectionsThe nearest tube station is Piccadilly Circus which is on the Piccadilly and the Bakerloo Underground lines. From Piccadilly follow Regent Street southwards towards Pall Mall and take the first road on the right called Jermyn Street. Duke of York Street is the second road on the left and leads to St James's Square. Chatham House is immediately on your right.MapAccommodationAlthough we cannot book accommodation for delegates, we have arranged a reduced rate at some nearby hotels, where you can book your own accommodation. Please inform the hotel that you will be attending a conference at Chatham House (The Royal Institute of International Affairs) to qualify for the Institute's reduced rate.Please note all rates are subject to availability.Flemings MayfairHalf Moon StreetMayfairLondon W1J 7BHTel: + 44 (0)20 7499 2964Fax: + 44 (0)20 7499 1817Standard Single from £199 + VATThe Cavendish London81 Jermyn StreetLondonSW1Y 6JFTel: + 44 (0)20 7930 2111Fax: + 44 (0)20 7839 2125Standard Single £205 + VATTo book The Cavendish onlineThe Stafford London by KempinskiSt James's PlaceLondonSW1A 1NJTel: 020 7518 1125Fax: 020 7493 7121Standard Single £230 +VAT This conference will be held under the Chatham House Rule. Information for journalists Press can request a press pass. Chatham House Conferences +44 (0)20 7957 5729 Email Full Article
science and technology A Global Response to HFCs through Fair and Effective Ozone and Climate Policies By feedproxy.google.com Published On :: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 13:27:40 +0000 11 July 2014 Rising HFC use poses a significant threat to intergovernmental efforts to combat climate change. At present, there is a glaring regulatory gap in this area. Although challenging, there is no reason why the international community cannot come together to address this new problem of coordination and ensure that legal regimes support each other. Full Report Summary Duncan Brack Associate Fellow, Energy, Environment and Resources Programme @DuncanBrack Google Scholar Stephen O. Andersen Director of Research, the Institute for Governance & Sustainable Development (IGSD) Joanna Depledge Affiliated Lecturer, Department of Politics and International Studies, University of Cambridge 20140710GlacierHFCClimate.jpg In this aerial image, icebergs are seen as a glacier is flown into the sea on July 30, 2012 near Qaanaaq, Greenland. Photo by The Asahi Shimbun via Getty Images. Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) are replacements for many of the chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) currently being phased out under the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer. Unlike those ozone-depleting substances (ODS), HFCs do not destroy the ozone layer, but they are very powerful greenhouse gases (GHGs) – up to thousands of times more damaging to the climate than carbon dioxide – and their use is currently growing faster than any other category of GHGs. Projections show HFC use increasing as much as 30-fold by 2050, adding up to 0.1°C of global average temperature rise by mid-century, and increasing up to five-fold, to 0.5°C, by 2100. This clearly makes it more difficult to limit the rise in global temperature to the internationally agreed ceiling of 2°C – and thereby avoid dangerous climate change – by the end of the 21st century.As GHGs, HFCs fall under the purview of the 1992 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and are explicitly listed under the UNFCCC’s 1997 Kyoto Protocol, which controls emissions of HFCs and other GHGs. They are not, however, subject to any specific measures under the climate agreements, and this is unlikely to change in the near future. Accordingly, the last five years have seen proposals to amend the Montreal Protocol to phase down the production and consumption of HFCs.Such a step would have a number of advantages. Since substitutes already exist for almost all uses of HFCs, the consumption and production phase-out model of the Montreal Protocol is better suited to controlling HFCs than the emissions limits controls of the climate regime; and the individuals and organizations involved in implementing the Montreal Protocol have accumulated substantial experience and expertise in dealing with precisely those industrial sectors in which HFCs are used, including refrigeration and air-conditioning, foams, solvents and aerosols.This paper, which draws on the discussions at a workshop held at Chatham House in April 2014, outlines the main issues around the question of how best to craft a fair and effective global response to the growth in HFC use. A number of key issues are central to the debate: the principle of equity between developed and developing countries; the availability of alternatives to HFCs; the need for financial support for developing countries; the legal relationship between the climate and ozone regimes; and, underlying all these, the need for political will to resolve these challenges. Department/project Energy, Environment and Resources Programme Full Article
science and technology EU Lays Down Marker for Global Climate Action By feedproxy.google.com Published On :: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 13:21:32 +0000 24 October 2014 Antony Froggatt Senior Research Fellow, Energy, Environment and Resources Programme LinkedIn Shane Tomlinson Former Senior Research Fellow, Energy, Environment and Resources The EU’s climate and energy package represents an important step ahead of a potential global deal next year in Paris. But a disappointing approach to energy efficiency and uncertainty over governance threatens to undermine delivery. 20141024MerkelSchulzClimate.jpg German Chancellor Angela Merkel talks with European parliament president Martin Schulz during an EU climate summit on 23 October 2014. Photo by Getty Images. The European Union has reached agreement on its 2030 climate and energy package in preparation for the next major international climate summit in Paris in December 2015. In the agreement member states have signed up to reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by at least 40% by 2030 – compared to 1990 levels. Currently emissions are approximately 20% below 1990 levels and so the 2030 target represents a continuation of current decarbonization trends, but it is below the rate of reductions required to meet the longer term objective of cutting emission by 80-95% by 2050.However, the overall 40% reduction will still drive structural changes in Europe’s economy and the energy sector. This could and should be seen as an opportunity for the EU to become a world leader in the innovation of both the new technologies and systems, such as electricity storage, dynamic demand responses and the deployment of electric vehicles, all of which are experiencing a rapid increase in the size of their global markets.But there are some concerns. The climate and energy package has put forward a collective target to double the current level of renewables so that it will provide at least 27% of energy by 2030. However, the target is binding on the EU as a whole but not on individual member states, which creates uncertainty and is further complicated by a lack of clarity on the enforcement mechanism, which remains vague. To avoid loss of investor and industrial confidence a transparent process needs to be rapidly developed that ensures compliance. The EU has also failed to give energy efficiency the priority it deserves, downgrading it to an indicative target (i.e. one that is aspirational only) of a 27% reduction in energy use from business as usual. However, this is equivalent to, at most, a 19% reduction from Europe's pre-recession trajectory. The weaker energy efficiency and renewable energy elements of the package reflects the resistance of a relatively small number of countries to further EU-wide legal commitments, either because they prefer market inducement or due to their reluctance to reform their energy sectors. The package also makes clear that the a reformed Emissions Trading Scheme will be the main instrument to achieve the GHG reduction target and proposes to accelerate the reduction of the cap on maximum permitted emissions. However, this would only kick in after 2021, meaning the scheme will remain relatively ineffective for at least another five years. The crisis in Ukraine and the potential implications for security of supply once again highlights the importance of both domestic energy production and common European approaches to energy suppliers. Every 1% of energy saved across the EU reduces gas imports by 2.6%, and a stronger target would do more to reduce dependence on Russian gas imports. The EU’s failure to adopt a more far reaching and binding target on energy efficiency is a missed opportunity given that it is one of the only approaches that delivers on the three pillars on energy policy, namely environmental protection, competitiveness and security of supply, simultaneously.It is important to note the progress that the EU has made in both meeting its climate targets over the last decade and the impact that this has had on its other energy policy objectives. Currently, the EU’s 2020 target for reducing GHG emissions by 20% has or is very close to being met, in part due to the economic downturn, but also due to efficiency, renewable energy and changing industrial patterns and technologies. Furthermore, the use of renewable energy is now estimated to save around €30 billion per year in imported energy, improving balance of payments and improving security of supply. Likewise improvements in energy efficiency have been shown since the turn of the century to have contributed to a 1% annual reduction in energy consumption in the EU.But the EU is not alone in preparing national carbon reduction targets for the UNFCCC conference in Paris 2015. Both China and the US, the world’s first and second largest emitters, are preparing their own emission reduction plans. China announced in September that it would put forward a new target for the peaking of its carbon dioxide emissions as early as possible. It is suggested that this might be as early as in 2025, with the potential for peak coal use coming even earlier in 2020. The US has proposed to set limits on the emissions from new coal-fired power stations and a 30% reduction in US power sector emissions by 2030 (relative to their 2005 baseline), and President Obama is expected to go further with new climate measures next year.In the year ahead all countries that are party to the UNFCCC are expected to put on the table their national carbon abatement plans for 2030. Some will be conditional upon further international assistance and commitments. The package agreed by Europe has scope to respond to increased efforts by other countries. This could include increasing the EU’s own domestic target (currently framed as ‘at least 40%’) or through international offsets and climate finance. How the EU responds to other countries efforts will be a test of its global leadership on climate issues.To comment on this article, please contact Chatham House Feedback Full Article
science and technology Fossil Fuels Expert Roundtable: How Much Fossil Fuel Has to Stay in the Ground, and Where? By feedproxy.google.com Published On :: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 16:00:01 +0000 Invitation Only Research Event 17 March 2015 - 4:30pm to 6:00pm Chatham House, London Event participants Christophe McGlade, Research Associate, UCL Institute for Sustainable ResourcesChair: Shane Tomlinson, Senior Research Fellow, Energy, Environment and Resources, Chatham House It has long been argued that if we are to limit the effects of climate change, some fossil fuel reserves must stay in the ground. But how much of each fuel; and which locations must remain untapped? A new study, recently published in Nature finds that a third of oil reserves, half of gas reserves and over 80 per cent of current coal reserves globally should remain in the ground and not be used before 2050 if global warming is to stay below the 2°C threshold. The speaker will discuss the methods used to generate these estimates, the key findings of the paper, and the implications that they may have in this milestone year for addressing climate change. Attendance at this event is by invitation only. Department/project Energy, Environment and Resources Programme Owen Grafham Manager, Energy, Environment and Resources Programme +44 (0)20 7957 5708 Email Full Article
science and technology Why wealthy countries must not drop nuclear energy: coal power, climate change and the fate of the global poor By feedproxy.google.com Published On :: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 11:37:45 +0000 12 March 2015 , Volume 91, Number 2 Reinhard Wolf Full Article
science and technology Africa's Responses to Climate Change: Policies to Manage Threat and Create Opportunity By feedproxy.google.com Published On :: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 10:30:01 +0000 Research Event 23 September 2015 - 12:00pm to 1:30pm Chatham House, London Meeting Summarypdf | 112.65 KB Event participants Dr Fatima Denton, Director, Special Initiatives Division, UN Economic Commission for AfricaDr Chukwumerije Okereke, Associate Professor, University of ReadingDouglas Brew, Director External Affairs, Communications and Sustainable Living for Africa, UnileverChair: Bob Dewar, Associate Fellow, Africa Programme, Chatham House African countries will be amongst the worst affected by climate change. High levels of poverty and underdevelopment combined with insufficient infrastructure exacerbate the already severe impact of global warming on resources, development and human security. In order to adapt to and mitigate the effects of climate change, Africa’s leaders need to implement more robust environmental policies, increase local human capacity and encourage renewable energy entrepreneurship. Within international fora, they must better coordinate their position as some of the smallest contributors to global warming.Ahead of the upcoming UN conference on climate change in Paris, this discussion will examine the prospects for African countries to present a stronger collective voice within the international efforts against climate change, as well as the role that the international community and public and private partners can play in supporting local capacity and lower carbon economic growth. Department/project Africa Programme, Energy, Environment and Resources Programme Full Article
science and technology Trudeau Election Marks New Start for Canada By feedproxy.google.com Published On :: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 12:17:01 +0000 22 October 2015 Cleo Paskal Associate Fellow, Energy, Environment and Resources Programme and Asia-Pacific Programme @CleoPaskal Canada's partners are about to see a sea change in policy from the new Liberal government on a range of issues, especially relating to energy and the environment. 20151022Trudeau.jpg Canadian Liberal Party leader Justin Trudeau arrives to give a press conference in Ottawa on 20 October 2015. Photo by Getty Images. The Liberal Party likes to think of itself as ‘Canada’s natural governing party’. Though they have been out of power for 10 years, and newly elected prime minister Justin Trudeau is relatively inexperienced, the party has deep and old networks across the country. The backroom is full of experienced old hands, including former prime ministers who have known Trudeau since he was a toddler. With a number of bold shifts promised in Canadian foreign policy, and a willingness to be fiscally expansive (Trudeau has said he is willing to run deficits for three years to implement their policies), the change is likely to be dramatic, fast and unrelenting.International engagementThe Liberals’ proposed new Canada has a hint of nostalgia for a time when Canadians thought of themselves as a force for good in the world. There is likely to be a large-scale reengagement with the international community, especially the United Nations, not only on climate policy, but also peacekeeping and disaster response. Canada’s French-speaking experts make it well placed to engage in crisis-hit French-speaking countries while carrying somewhat less colonial baggage. Meanwhile, the Liberals have promised to withdraw Canadian forces from the combat mission against ISIS in Iraq, pledging instead to reorient their focus towards aid.Science-based policiesTrudeau has the backing of a very deep bench of experienced parliamentarians, some of whom have been waiting a long time to get back in the governing game. They include Stéphane Dion, the former environment minister who gained respect for his chairing of the 2005 UN climate change conference in Montreal, and Marc Garneau, former astronaut and president of the Canadian Space Agency. This will be a government that understands and values (and has promised to restore funding for) scientific research.This means more investment in climate resilience, renewables and other forward planning policies, but also a reexamination of some of Canada’s long-standing strengths, including Canada’s fisheries. Under the previous government, over half-a-dozen critical fisheries research libraries were shut down, in some cases with large-scale loss of data. A more science-based fisheries policy, combined with the promised funding to the Royal Canadian Navy, may result in a reinvigorated and coordinated Canadian fisheries policy. This would become particularly important in a time of global food constraints.‘Nation-to-nation’Trudeau’s stated goal of establishing ‘nation-to-nation’ relations with Canada’s indigenous peoples has potentially global implications.Through treaties, Canada’s First Nations can stake a claim to about a third of Canada’s landmass, including resource rich areas. They own or control access to land that contains oil, gas, uranium, gold, diamonds and much more. China, for one, realized the potential power of First Nations as far back as 2008, when Beijing invited over two dozen indigenous leaders to China to talk business. During that trip, Peguis Chief Glenn Hudson explained that the trip was ‘an important step for us in moving forward. Our future is not only in Canada, but partnering with other countries.’Trudeau’s ‘nation-to-nation’ statement acknowledges the strengthening role of First Nations in Canada’s resource policy. Indigenous communities have been among the most adversely affected by oil sands development and, in other parts of Canada, have successfully blocked resources extraction or transit. For example, in May, the Lax Kw'alaams Band refused to allow a proposed multi-million dollar Petronas LNG project to be developed on their land over concerns it would affect their economically and culturally important salmon runs.Real First Nations engagement with resource management has the potential substantially change Canada’s energy, environment and resources profile. First Nations in eastern Canada have already blocked hydro development that could power much of the northeastern United States and, in a time of pipeline expansion, First Nations might become instrumental in deciding if more pipelines will run north-to-south, towards the border with the United States, or east-to-west, towards the Pacific and the markets in Asia.Energy sectorAt the same time, while Trudeau said he was against the Northern Gateway pipeline, in large part because of how it would affect the people of the Pacific coast, he backed Keystone XL. However, he is unlikely to push for it in the face of a veto by President Obama. Also, low fossil fuel prices contributed to the election in May of a left-leaning provincial government in the badly hit oil heartland of Alberta. If prices stay low, that could very well combine with Liberal campaign promises to put a coordinated national price on carbon and to phase out fossil fuel subsidies, additionally reshaping Canada’s energy landscape..Agriculture and the Trans-Pacific PartnershipThe Liberals also have a stated goal of investing in a more innovative and safe agricultural sector, while defending the interests of Canadian farmers. This dovetails with their promise to openly examine and discuss the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) before ratification. Canadian dairy farmers in particular were concerned about some of the TPP provisions but, without access to the details of the text, it was difficult to estimate how the sector would be affected.One proposed agricultural policy that may have widespread economic implications is the legalization, regulation and taxation of marijuana. As some states in the United States have found, this has the potential to be economically beneficial and, for Canada, a possible major boon to cross-border tourism.In a myriad of small ways, and a few big ones, the new Liberal government plans to change Canada’s international role and domestic landscape. This is one to watch.To comment on this article, please contact Chatham House Feedback Full Article
science and technology Implications of climate change for the UN Security Council: mapping the range of potential policy responses By feedproxy.google.com Published On :: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 14:06:18 +0000 6 November 2015 , Volume 91, Number 6 Shirley V. Scott Full Article
science and technology A Good Deal? Assessing the Paris Climate Agreement By feedproxy.google.com Published On :: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 10:00:02 +0000 Invitation Only Research Event 16 December 2015 - 5:00pm to 6:30pm Chatham House, London Event participants Shane Tomlinson, Senior Research Fellow, Energy, Environment and Resources Department, Chatham House Following the conclusion of the Paris climate negotiations, this expert roundtable will examine the critical elements of the final agreement and what this means for the future of energy and climate policy in key countries.The discussion will examine what the agreement means for keeping global average temperatures below two degrees Celsius and assess whether ambition will be ratcheted over time. It will also look at the primary implications of the outcome for key regions and countries such as the EU, United States, China and India. Finally, the session will also consider the next steps in terms of implementing the agreement. Attendance at this event is by invitation only. Department/project Energy, Environment and Resources Programme Owen Grafham Manager, Energy, Environment and Resources Programme +44 (0)20 7957 5708 Email Full Article
science and technology Europe’s Energy Union: Foreign Policy Implications for Energy Security, Climate and Competitiveness By feedproxy.google.com Published On :: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:09:24 +0000 31 March 2016 By addressing structural divisions between member states, the Energy Union could have a beneficial effect on the EU’s capacity to conduct a unified and effective foreign policy, write Thomas Raines and Shane Tomlinson. Download PDF Thomas Raines Director, Europe Programme @TomHRaines Google Scholar Shane Tomlinson Former Senior Research Fellow, Energy, Environment and Resources, Chatham House 2016-03-31-europe-energy-union.jpg True colour satellite image of Europe at night. Photo via Getty Images. SummaryPlans for an EU-wide Energy Union are taking shape, following the European Commission’s adoption in February 2015 of a ‘Framework Strategy for a Resilient Energy Union with a Forward-Looking Climate Change Policy’. The strategy underlines the EU’s ambition to attain ‘secure, sustainable, competitive, affordable energy for every European’.The initiative seeks to transform energy markets and energy/climate policy across the EU. Its goals include cross-border coordination and integration in energy security, supply, market operations, regulation, energy efficiency, low-carbon development, and research and innovation.There is an important foreign policy aspect to the Energy Union, given the imperative of managing security and supply risks in Europe’s neighbourhood and further afield. By addressing structural divisions between member states, the Energy Union could have a marked beneficial effect on the EU’s capacity to conduct a unified and effective foreign policy.Development of the Energy Union presents abundant challenges, however. Policy and legislative changes will need to be coordinated across 28 countries. Variations in EU member states’ attitudes to security and energy policy may lead to differences in, or clashes between, priorities. The wider context is also complicated. Interrelated challenges rooted in broader policy issues include the partial transition to low-carbon energy, and concerns over competitiveness relative to other major economies.The current EU approach to energy security and infrastructure focuses on natural gas. This ‘gas first’ approach risks crowding out other responses to the energy security challenge. It could result in the creation of ‘stranded assets’, if the future gas demand on which investments are predicated does not match projections. A narrow focus on new gas infrastructure could also impede development of other dimensions of the Energy Union.The markets for coal, oil, gas and renewables are changing significantly. The shale oil and gas ‘revolution’ in the United States has altered the economics of hydrocarbon fuels, and the plunge in oil prices since mid-2014 is causing energy businesses in the EU to reassess investment plans.The EU is rapidly expanding the use of renewable energy. Dramatically falling prices for renewables will challenge traditional energy utility business models. How the Energy Union enables market access for new business models will be key to determining future energy trajectories. Department/project Europe Programme, UK-EU27 Energy Cooperation, Energy, Environment and Resources Programme Full Article
science and technology Post-Paris: Taking Forward the Global Climate Change Deal By feedproxy.google.com Published On :: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 09:38:39 +0000 21 April 2016 Inevitably, the compromises of the Paris Agreement make it both a huge achievement and an imperfect solution to the problem of global climate change. Rob Bailey Former Research Director, Energy, Environment and Resources @ClimateRob Shane Tomlinson Former Senior Research Fellow, Energy, Environment and Resources 2016-04-21-post-paris.jpg The slogan '1.5 Degrees' is projected on the Eiffel Tower as part of the World Climate Change Conference 2015 (COP21) on 11 December 2015 in Paris, France. Photo by Getty Images. SummaryThe Paris Agreement, reached at COP21, was a triumph of diplomacy. The deal can be characterized as: flexible, combining a ‘hard’ legal shell and a ‘soft’ enforcement mechanism; inclusive, as it was adopted by all 196 parties to the UNFCCC and is therefore the first truly global climate deal; messy, as the bottom-up process of creating nationally determined contributions means the system is unstandardized; non-additive, as the contributions do not currently deliver the agreement’s stated long-term goal of keeping the rise in global average temperature to ‘well below 2˚C’; and dynamic, as the deal establishes a ratchet mechanism that requires more ambitious contributions every five years.The next five years are critical for keeping the below 2˚C goal within reach. A ‘facilitative dialogue’ starting in 2018 will give states the opportunity to revisit their contributions in advance of the agreement entering into force in 2020. International forums, such as the G7 and G20, can play a crucial role in kickstarting these efforts.The ‘coalitions of the willing’ and clubs that were launched under the Lima-Paris Action Agenda provide an innovative space for state and non-state actors to unlock transformational change. However, it is important that these groups set specific and measurable targets to ensure effective delivery of objectives.The post-Paris regime implies a significant role for civil society organizations. However, in many countries the ‘safe operating space’ both for these organizations and for the media is shrinking. Expanding the capacity of civil society and the media in areas such as communications, litigation, project implementation and technical expertise will be important if they are to support the regime effectively. Related documents Briefing: Post-Paris: Taking Forward the Global Climate Change Dealpdf | 391.55 KB Department/project Energy, Environment and Resources Programme Full Article
science and technology UK Unplugged? The Impacts of Brexit on Energy and Climate Policy By feedproxy.google.com Published On :: Wed, 25 May 2016 10:43:26 +0000 26 May 2016 In the field of energy and climate change policy, remaining in the EU offers the best balance of policy options for Britain’s national interests. Download PDF Antony Froggatt Senior Research Fellow, Energy, Environment and Resources Programme LinkedIn Thomas Raines Director, Europe Programme @TomHRaines Google Scholar Shane TomlinsonSenior Associate, E3G; Former Senior Research Fellow, Chatham House 2016-05-26-uk-unplugged-brexit-energy.jpg A line of electricity pylons stretches beyond fields of rapeseed near Hutton Rudby, North Yorkshire, on 27 April 2015. Photo: Getty Images. SummaryOver the last 30 years the EU has played a central role in addressing the competitiveness, security and climate dimensions of energy policy among its member states. The UK has been critical in driving forward integration of the European energy market, and has been a strong advocate of liberalized energy markets and some climate change mitigation policies.If, at the June 2016 referendum, the UK does vote to leave the EU, energy and climate policy will be part of the overall package of issues to be negotiated, as it is unlikely that each sector will be treated separately. The model of relations for energy and climate may well be determined by political and public sentiment on higher-profile issues such as freedom of movement, rather than by what is best for the UK in these policy areas.The UK is increasingly reliant on imports, including from and through continental Europe, and its energy market is deeply integrated with that of its European neighbours. As a growing share of the UK’s electricity is exchanged with EU partners, it would be neither possible nor desirable to ‘unplug’ the UK from Europe’s energy networks. A degree of continued adherence to EU market, environmental and governance rules would be inevitable.This paper reviews the risks and trade-offs associated with five possible options for a post-exit relationship. Of these, the Norway or the Energy Community models would be the least disruptive, enabling continuity in energy market access, regulatory frameworks and investment; however, both would come at the cost of accepting the vast majority of legislation while relinquishing any say in its creation. The UK would thus have less, rather than more, sovereignty over energy policy.The Switzerland, the Canada and the WTO models offer the possibility of greater sovereignty in a number of areas, such as buildings and infrastructure standards as well as state aid. None the less, each would entail higher risks, with greater uncertainty over market access, investment and electricity prices. These models would reduce or even eliminate the UK’s contribution to the EU budget, but would also limit or cut off access to EU funding mechanisms.All five Brexit models would undermine the UK’s influence in international energy and climate diplomacy. The UK would no longer play any direct role in shaping the climate and energy policies of its EU neighbours, at a time when the EU’s proposed Energy Union initiatives offer the prospect of a more integrated and effective European energy sector. A decision to leave the EU would make it easier for a future UK government to change direction on climate policy, since only a change in domestic legislation would be required.‘Brexit’ could affect the balance of energy policy among the remaining member states. In its absence, the centre of gravity for EU energy policy might shift away from market mechanisms and result in weaker collective action on greenhouse gas reduction targets.In the field of energy and climate change policy, remaining in the EU offers the best balance of policy options for Britain’s national interests: the UK would continue to benefit from the integrated energy market, while maintaining influence over its direction and minimizing uncertainty for crucial investment. Department/project Europe Programme, UK-EU27 Energy Cooperation, Energy, Environment and Resources Programme Full Article
science and technology The UK's Decision to Leave the EU: What Next for UK Energy and Climate? By feedproxy.google.com Published On :: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 12:00:01 +0000 Invitation Only Research Event 12 July 2016 - 3:00pm to 6:30pm Chatham House, London In May 2016, Chatham House published a research paper that assessed the options for the UK’s climate and energy policy in the event of a British vote to leave the EU. It determined that:The UK’s energy market is deeply integrated with that of its European neighbours and that it would be neither possible nor desirable to ‘unplug’ the UK from Europe’s energy networks. A degree of continued adherence to EU market regulations, energy efficiency standards of appliances, environmental and governance rules would be inevitable. The EU’s collective negotiation on international climate issues has given the UK greater political weight than any member state has alone.The EU’s coordinated approach in engaging with major fossil fuel producers such as Russia and countries in the Middle East has helped support price stability and security of supply, including through infrastructure investment to make existing pipeline systems more efficient and improve storage and capacity. In light of the decision to leave, Chatham House is hosting a roundtable to reassess the options for a future UK-EU energy and climate change partnership. The meeting will bring together those experienced on UK and EU policy in both climate change and energy and explore the short and medium-term climate and energy policy considerations. Attendance at this event is by invitation only. Department/project Energy, Environment and Resources Programme Owen Grafham Manager, Energy, Environment and Resources Programme +44 (0)20 7957 5708 Email Full Article
science and technology Accelerating Innovation for a Circular Economy By feedproxy.google.com Published On :: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 09:15:01 +0000 Invitation Only Research Event 12 July 2016 - 9:30am to 5:30pm Chatham House, London Over the next two decades, a combination of ‘circular economy’ approaches and distributed manufacturing methods such as 3D printing raise the prospect of fundamental changes to the nature of production, the reconfiguration of supply chains and changes to patterns of resource consumption – with profound implications for sustainability. This roundtable will bring together expert participants from companies, government, civil society and academia to discuss the state of innovation in the ‘circular economy,’ with a particular focus on the approaches and activities of entrepreneurs and investors, what is needed to scale up and accelerate innovation, how to track and measure progress, and how to ensure that innovation in the ‘circular economy’ makes a significant contribution to the meeting of short and medium term climate and sustainability goals.Attendance at this event is by invitation only. Department/project Energy, Environment and Resources Programme Johanna Lehne Research Associate, Energy, Environment and Resources +44 (0)20 7314 3629 Email Full Article
science and technology Security and Climate Change: Are we Living in 'The Age of Consequences'? By feedproxy.google.com Published On :: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 14:23:00 +0000 Research Event 1 December 2016 - 7:00pm to 9:00pm Chatham House, London Event participants Brigadier General Stephen A. Cheney, CEO, American Security Project; Member, Foreign Affairs Policy Board, US Department of StateMajor General Munir Muniruzzaman, President and CEO, Bangladesh Institute of Peace and Security Studies; Former Military Advisor to the President of Bangladesh Rear Admiral Neil Morisetti, Director of Strategy, UK Department of Science, Technology, Engineering and Public Policy; University College London; Former UK Government Climate and Energy Security EnvoyDr Patricia Lewis, Research Director, International Security, Chatham HouseChair: Rt Hon Sir Oliver Letwin MP, Former UK Cabinet Office Minister The US Department of Defense regards climate change as an ‘accelerant of instability and conflict’. A former head of the US Pacific Command described it as the most significant long-term security threat in his region. US federal agencies have recently been mandated to fully consider the impacts of climate change in the development of national security policy. This step-change in the US approach reflects the Pentagon’s conclusion that climate impacts are a ‘threat multiplier’ for security concerns – not just for the future – but which pose ‘an immediate risk to national security’.A new documentary from the US, The Age of Consequences, explores the links between climate change and security, including in current events in Syria, Egypt, the Sahel and Bangladesh. Our high-level panel will reflect on key sections from the documentary, which will be screened during the event, and explore whether security strategists, militaries and policy-makers in nations other than the US are fully cognisant of the risks posed by a changing climate, and whether they are ready to anticipate and respond to its potentially destabilizing effects.The panel discussion will be followed by a Q&A.THIS EVENT IS NOW FULL AND REGISTRATION HAS CLOSED. Department/project Energy, Environment and Resources Programme Full Article