as

Young talent motivated by Matildas

FOUR years ago, Olivia Mitchell joined her first soccer team. Now the 12 year old is set to represent NSW in the national primary schools competition.




as

The ball’s in Yasmin’s court

With a knack for defence and a focus on team play, Yasmin Halas has a promising future on the netball court.




as

‘There was an evil feeling within the council’

NORTH Sydney mayor Jilly Gibson has made an astonishing claim that councillors had a pact to drive her to a nervous breakdown adding that there was “an evil feeling within” the council.




as

‘Nightmare’ rat run boom gate trashed

MOSMAN Council will replace a trashed boom gate near a “nightmare” rat run after a second illegal extension was installed and the entire boom broken.




as

Report: United recall players to UK as Premier League eyes restart




as

Anatomy of a Classic Goal: Bergkamp's pirouette vs. Newcastle




as

Leicester City's iconic 2016 title run was beautiful and surreal




as

Di Maria's wife blasts 'horrible' Manchester in remarkable rant




as

Walker feels 'harassed' after scrutiny over family visit during lockdown




as

Ranking every goal that's won the Puskas Award




as

People v. Astorga-Lider

(California Court of Appeal) - Affirmed an order declaring a deed of trust void, in a case where a woman pleaded guilty to grand theft for encumbering a married couple's real property with a fraudulent deed of trust.



  • White Collar Crime
  • Property Law & Real Estate
  • Criminal Law & Procedure

as

Solskjaer casts doubt over Rashford's Euro 2020 involvement




as

Belgium boss Martinez: Hazard sidelined 'for at least 3 months'




as

Report: UEFA asks countries to let Euro 2020 happen despite COVID-19 threat




as

Footy Podcast: Soccer world grapples with coronavirus outbreak




as

Report: UEFA wants Women's Euro 2021 moved to avoid competition clashes




as

ZUP, LLC v. Nash Manufacturing, Inc.

(United States Federal Circuit) - Affirmed that a patent for a water recreational board was invalid as obvious. On appeal, the patent holder argued that its invention of a recreational board that would help athletically challenged people ride on the water was not obvious. In a 2-1 decision, the Federal Circuit disagreed and affirmed the district court decision granting summary judgment to the defendant in this patent infringement action.




as

BSG Tech LLC v. BuySeasons, Inc

(United States Federal Circuit) - Affirmed. Plaintiff sued defendant for infringement of several patents related to systems and methods for indexing information stored in wide access databases. The district court agreed with the defendant and held all asserted claims invalid as ineligible under 35 U.S.C. section 101.




as

Bodum USA, Inc. v. A Top New Casting Inc.

(United States Seventh Circuit) - Held that the manufacturer of a coffeemaker infringed the unregistered trade dress of a competitor's widely lauded product by mimicking the overall appearance. Affirmed a jury verdict.




as

Ticats dump Eskimos in East final, earn 1st Grey Cup berth since 2014




as

107th Grey Cup primer: Can Bombers crush Ticats' dream season?




as

Eskimos fire head coach Jason Maas after 4 seasons




as

Eskimos hire Milanovich as next HC




as

Argos dismiss Chamblin, hire Stampeders' Dinwiddie as new HC




as

CFL delays beginning of season due to COVID-19




as

CFL asks government for $150M in financial assistance amid shutdown




as

CFL commissioner: 'Our most likely scenario is no season'




as

Goannas claw wins

HOLROYD Parramatta Goannas under-13s team continued its dominance of the Western Sydney Giants Juniors, claiming a third consecutive premiership.




as

Top basketball talent aims for big leagues

THE dream of playing against the world’s best basketballers in the NBA fuels Jason Khattar’s passion for basketball.




as

Aerobics ace Carissa Uno reaches new heights in Las Vegas

WHAT happens in Vegas typically stays in Vegas, but Carissa Uno will take everything she learned at a gymnastics tournament in Sin City to inspire her to greater heights.




as

Warringah aim high for season

SATURDAY marks the start of another Sydney Shires season – and Warringah are gunning for the top four.




as

Pressure on Manly fast bowlers to strike

MANLY skipper Adam Crosthwaite expects his quicks to fire on Saturday should his team field first in their two-day clash versus Sydney.




as

In the Matter of Peter J. Galasso

(Court of Appeals of New York) - In disciplinary proceeding against an attorney for various misconduct, including allegations that he failed to properly supervise the firm's bookkeeper resulting in misappropriation of client funds and that he breached his fiduciary duty by failing to safeguard those funds, the order of the Appellate Division is modified to dismiss the charge for failing to timely comply with the Grievance Committee's lawful demands for information where the imposition of this separate charge is unsupported by the record.




as

Fair Laboratory Practices Associates v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc.

(United States Second Circuit) - Judgment dismissing this qui tam action alleging that defendants engaged in a scheme of kickbacks, bribes, or rebates designed to induce referrals of Medicare and Medicaid business, is affirmed, where: 1) defendant's former general counsel, through his conduct in this qui tam action, violated his ethical obligations under New York Rules of Professional Conduct 1.9(c) which, in relevant part, prohibits lawyers from using confidential information of a former client protected by Rule 1.6 to the disadvantage of the former client, except to the extent that the lawyer reasonably believes necessary to prevent the client from committing a crime; and 2) the district court did not err by dismissing the complaint as to all defendants, and disqualifying plaintiff, its general partners, and its outside counsel on the basis that such measures were necessary to avoid prejudicing defendants in any subsequent litigation on these facts.




as

In re Glass

(Supreme Court of California) - The bar applicant, a former journalist who was exposed as having fabricated material for more than 40 articles for The New Republic magazine and other publications, has not sustained his heavy burden of demonstrating rehabilitation and fitness for the practice of law, and therefore the applicant is denied admission to the practice of law.



  • Ethics & Disciplinary Code
  • Ethics & Professional Responsibility
  • Media Law

as

Ryan v. Astra Tech, Inc.

(United States First Circuit) - Orders revoking Attorney Ryan's pro hac vice admission and imposing monetary sanctions are affirmed, where Ryan falsified evidence and lied to the court about attempting to interfere with the deposition of his client.



  • Ethics & Disciplinary Code

as

ASDI, Inc. v. Beard Research, Inc.

(Supreme Court of Delaware) - In an action for misappropriation of trade secrets, judgment for plaintiff is affirmed where a lawful termination of a contract is not fatal to a claim of tortious interference with contractual relations, because the focus of the claim is on the defendant's wrongful conduct that induces the termination of the contract, irrespective of whether the termination is lawful.




as

SASCO v. Rosendin Electric

(California Court of Appeal) - Postjudgment order awarding defendants attorney fees and costs pursuant to Civil Code section 3426.4 is affirmed where the trial court: 1) applied the correct interpretation of section 3426.4; and 2) did not abuse its discretion in finding "bad faith" on the part of plaintiff in bringing its trade secret misappropriation claim against defendants.




as

Texas Advanced Optoelectronic Solutions v. Renesas Electronics America

(United States Federal Circuit) - In a patent infringement action, arising after two manufacturers of ambient light sensors shared technical and financial information during negotiations for a possible merger, the jury verdict for plaintiff is affirmed in part, reversed in part, and vacated in part where: 1) defendant’s liability for trade secret misappropriation regarding a photodiode array structure is affirmed; 2) four patent infringement claims are reversed and four are affirmed; and 3) monetary damage awards are vacated and remanded for further consideration.




as

Texas Advanced Optoelectronic Solutions, Inc. v. Renesas Electronics America, Inc.

(United States Federal Circuit) - In a patent infringement action, arising after two manufacturers of ambient light sensors shared technical and financial information during negotiations for a possible merger, the appeals court affirmed in part, reversed in part, and vacated in part a jury verdict for plaintiff as follows: 1) defendant's liability for trade secret misappropriation regarding a photodiode array structure was affirmed; 2) several patent infringement claims were reversed and several were affirmed; and 3) monetary damage awards were vacated and remanded for further consideration.




as

Ashton was born to be a gymnast

Swinging, climbing, and taking risks has always been in Ashton Jamieson’s nature. So his parents made the decision early on to enrol him in gymnastics.




as

Bruno chases titles for Wanderers

WESTERN Sydney Wanderers’ newest recruit - Bruno Piñatares - has arrived from South America with a burning ambition “to win as many titles as possible”.




as

Sam makes a splash in diving world

Sam Fricker only took up diving “seriously” three years’ ago, but he’s already a star of the sport.




as

Killer turtle caught on Central Coast

ONE of the world’s most dangerous waterway pests — the red-eared slider turtle — has been caught in a shock discovery on the Central Coast.




as

Stoyas v. Toshiba Corp.

(United States Ninth Circuit) - Reversed the dismissal of a shareholder class action against Toshiba Corp. filed by investors who alleged securities fraud. The district court dismissed their claims on jurisdictional grounds and, on appeal, the plaintiffs argued that the district court misapplied principles regarding extraterritorial applicability of U.S. securities laws set forth in Morrison v. Nat'l Australia Bank Ltd., 561 U.S. 247 (2010). The Ninth Circuit agreed with plaintiffs and reversed and remanded with instructions to allow the plaintiffs to amend their shareholder complaint against the Japanese firm to overcome the jurisdictional hurdle.




as

Doe v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

(United States Second Circuit) - Held that a torture victim who had obtained a court judgment against a terrorist organization was not entitled to attach funds from the organization's blocked electronic fund transfers. The torture victim wanted several banks to turn over $36 million to him in order to satisfy a court judgment he had obtained against the terrorist organization in a U.S. court. In a 2-1 decision affirming the district court, the Second Circuit held that the punitively sanctioned organization's blocked assets were not subject to attachment.




as

Castro v. Tri Marine Fish Co. LLC

(United States Ninth Circuit) - Held that an order issued by an arbitrator in the Philippines was not an arbitral award entitled to enforcement under a United Nations convention on recognition of foreign arbitral awards, based on the particular circumstances here. Reversed and remanded, in this case involving a fishing vessel crew member's personal injury claim.




as

Kashef v. BNP Paribas S.A.

(United States Second Circuit) - Revived a New York tort lawsuit alleging that a French bank that evaded U.S. sanctions on Sudan aided and abetted the Sudanese regime in its commission of atrocities against the plaintiffs. Vacated a dismissal and remanded.




as

Bascunan v. Elsaca

(United States Second Circuit) - In a civil RICO case, held that a Chilean national may sue another Chilean national in the United States, because extraterritoriality issues did not bar the suit. The case involved allegations of fraudulent asset transfers from a New York bank account. Reversed a dismissal in relevant part.




as

Asahi Kasei Pharma Corp. v. Actelion Ltd.

(California Court of Appeal) - Judgment for plaintiff in an action alleging intentional interference with a License Agreement, interference with plaintiff's prospective economic advantage, breach of a confidentiality agreement, and breach of confidence, arising out of defendant Actelion's notice to plaintiff that following its acquisition of defendant CoTherix, defendant Co-Therix's would discontinue development of plaintiff's drug for "business and commercial reasons," is affirmed, where: 1) defendant Actelion, by virtue of its ownership interest, is not automatically immune from tortious interference with the License Agreement; 2) the jury was properly instructed on the elements of wrongful interference with contract and properly charged with considering whether defendants "used unlawful means to interfere with the License Agreement;" and 3) the manager's privilege does not exempt a manager from liability when he or she tortiously interferes with a contract or relationship between third parties.