We are an established and leading Forex broker opening a new Binary Options Trading Platform website launching in early Q2 2011. We are looking for a focused, experienced affiliate manager to join our team and help establish the affiliate community.

Location: Tel Aviv, Hamasger

Job Description:

* Help define affiliate program
* Create support system for affiliates
* Find and negotiate and close profitable affiliates according to CPM, CPA, CPL etc.. models
* Take care of Mass Newsletters, notifications, analytical reporting etc..
* Develop new channels and campaigns
* Develop and implement risk assessment models

Qualifications:

* Minimum 1 year of affiliate experience in Forex or Gaming
* English – Mother tongue level both spoken and written
* Marketing abilities (creating newsletters, promotions, notifications etc)
* High Microsoft Office skills (PP, Word and Excel)
* Enthusiastic, driven and self-motivated
* Experience in HTML a Plus

Please send all resumes to ubinaryjobs@gmail.com

Looking for a talented SEO Tech / Account Manager with at least two years experience in Organic SEO with a specialty in link building work.

Will work on a variety of SEO/SEM projects in many different industries as an independent contractor. Very competitive salary with rev-share options. Can work from anywhere in the country, but there will be weekly meetings in Jerusalem.

Please send CV’s to anahmani@gmail.com

Pre-requisites:

• Expert at Google Analytics. Know your way around goals, e-commerce tracking.
• Expert link builder with experience in a variety of off-site SEO techniques
• Expert at keyword research – identifying low hanging fruit via search volume and competitiveness and setting strategy to attack!
• Ability to manage multiple SEO campaigns at once.
• English mother tongue or fluency

• Familiarity with popular SEO tools,
• Experience with HTML, CSS, PHP, FBML
• CMS experience with installation and maintence of WordPress, Joomla, etc.
• PPC Campaigns in Adwords, Facebook, etc.
• Domain Management experience (DNS, hosting, FTP, etc)

Send cover letter and CV to rzauer@kenes.com

SEO Manager

• SEO and PPC campaigns for medical congresses around the world

• Design for web, email, and online banners

After the widely-heralded circulation and revocation of one AACS key, Ed Felten ran a satirical integer sale on his Freedom-to-Tinker blog. Now it seems one of the commenters decided to hide another processor key there, BoingBoing reports.

Of course, the odds are basically zero if the number was chosen at random. You have a better chance of winning the Powerball jackpot four days in a row. So, for more than a week, everyone who read the comment assumed that it was just another joke. But one thing about it was different: the cryptic hint to arnezami, a "uv" number, a pointer to a specific key within the AACS keyspace.

You can probably guess the rest of the story. Eventually someone tipped off arnezami about the strange comment, and he tried using the 45 5F … number to decrypt the new discs. It worked! It really is the new processing key. As a result, all HD-DVDs are open to the public again, at least until new titles can be updated once more.

Should blog-owners start to worry that their comment forums will earn them takedowns? I don't think so, but the law is remarkably unclear, as I wrote in a piece, Anticircumvention Takedowns, LinuxWorld just published, describing the last round of AACS-key purges:

Note that this claimed contribution to circumvention is a degree further removed from underlying copyright harm than a contributory infringement. The claim is not that hosts assisted in unlawful copying, but that they assisted in distribution of a component of a tool with which others might circumvent technological measures and thereby access copyrighted works or infringe copyright. That's a lot of layers of indirection, and courts have never yet adopted a “contributory circumvention” claim.

After blogging about ICANN's new gTLD policy or lack thereof, I've had several people ask me why I care so much about ICANN and new top-level domains. Domain names barely matter in a world of search and hyperlinks, I'm told, and new domains would amount to little more than a cash transfer to new registries from those trying to protect their names and brands. While I agree that type-in site-location is less and less relevant, and we haven't yet seen much end-user focused innovation in the use of domain names, I'm not ready to throw in the towel. I think ICANN is still in a position to do affirmative harm to Internet innovation.

You see, I don't concede that we know all the things the Internet will be used for, or all the things that could be done on top of and through its domain name system. I certainly don't claim that I do, and I don't believe that the intelligence gathered in ICANN would make that claim either.

Yet that's what it's doing by bureaucratizing the addition of new domain names: Asserting that no further experiments are possible; that the "show me the code" mode that built the Internet can no longer build enhancements to it. ICANN is unnecessarily ossifying the Internet's DNS at version 1.0, setting in stone a cumbersome model of registries and registrars, a pay-per-database-listing, semantic attachments to character strings, and limited competition for the lot. This structure is fixed in place by the GNSO constituency listing: Those who have interests in the existing setup are unlikely to welcome a new set of competitors bearing disruptions to their established business models. The "PDP" in the headline, ICANN's over-complex "Policy Development Process" (not the early DEC computer), gives too easy a holdout veto.

Meanwhile, we lose the chance to see what else could be done: whether it's making domain names so abundant that every blogger could have a meaningful set on a business card and every school child one for each different face of youthful experimentation, using the DNS hierarchy to store simple data or different kinds of pointers, spawning new services with new naming conventions, or something else entirely.

I don't know if any of these individually will "add value." Historically, however, we leave that question to the market where there's someone willing to give it a shot. Amazingly, after years of delay, there are still plenty of people waiting in ICANN queues to give new gTLDs a try. The collective value in letting them experiment and new services develop is indisputably greater than that constrained by the top-down imaginings of the few on the ICANN board and councils, as by their inability to pronounce .iii.

"How do you get an answer from the web?" the joke goes: "Put your guess into Wikipedia, then wait for the edits." While Wikipedians might prefer you at least source your guess, the joke isn't far from the mark. The lesson of Web 2.0 has been one of user-driven innovation, of launching services in beta and improving them by public experimentation. When your users know more than you or the regulators, the best you can do is often to give them a platform and support their efforts. Plan for the first try to break, and be ready to learn from the experience.

To trust the market, ICANN must be willing to let new TLDs fail. Instead of insisting that every new business have a 100-year plan, we should prepare the businesses and their stakeholders for contingency. Ensuring the "stable and secure operation of the Internet's unique identifier systems" should mean developing predictable responses to failure, not demanding impracticable guarantees of perpetual success. Escrow, clear consumer information, streamlined processes, and flexible responses to the expected unanticipated, can all protect the end-users better than the dubious foresight of ICANN's central regulators. These same regulators, bear in mind, didn't foresee that a five-day add-grace period would swell the ranks of domains with "tasters" gaming the loophole with ad-based parking pages.

At ten years old, we don't think of our mistakes as precedent, but as experience. Kids learn by doing; the ten-year-old ICANN needs to do the same. Instead of believing it can stabilize the Internet against change, ICANN needs to streamline for unpredictability. Expect the unexpected and be able to act quickly in response. Prepare to get some things wrong, at first, and so be ready to acknowledge mistakes and change course.

I anticipate the counter-argument here that I'm focused on the wrong level, that stasis in the core DNS enhances innovative development on top, but I don't think I'm suggesting anything that would destabilize established resources. Verisign is contractually bound to keep .com open for registrations and resolving as it has in the past, even if .foo comes along with a different model. But until Verisign has real competition for .com, stability on its terms thwarts rather than fosters development. I think we can still accommodate change on both levels.

The Internet is too young to be turned into a utility, settled against further innovation. Even for mature layers, ICANN doesn't have the regulatory competence to protect the end-user in the absence of market competition, while preventing change locks out potential competitive models. Instead, we should focus on protecting principles such as interoperability that have already proved their worth, to enhance user-focused innovation at all levels. A thin ICANN should merely coordinate, not regulate.

Location: Main Library- PK6393.T33N39 2014

Location: Main Library- PK6415.2.H37 2014

Location: Main Library- DS269.P3N35 2015

Location: Main Library- PK6562.36.A77S53 2015

Location: Main Library- PK6562.24.U87B3 2014

Location: Main Library- DS353.A945 2015

Location: Main Media Collection - Video record 42363 DVD

Location: Main Media Collection - Video record 42433 DVD

Location: Main Media Collection - Video record 42430 DVD

Location: Main Media Collection - Video record 42307 DVD

Location: Main Media Collection - Video record 42355 DVD

Location: Main Media Collection - Video record 42306 DVD

Location: Main Media Collection - Video record 42318 DVD

Location: Main Media Collection - Video record 42357 DVD

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Law Electronic Resource- 

Location: Engineering Library- QA76.73.J39B76 2016

Location: Engineering Library- TA656.N53 2016

Location: Engineering Library- TA168.B53 2016

Location: Engineering Library- TD665.P46 2016

Location: Engineering Library- TA409.L346 2016

Location: Engineering Library- TK5105.59.K68 2016

Location: Engineering Library- TS174.B455 2016

Location: Engineering Library- TA1560.B33 2016