Library - Art Library, Location - LIB, Call number - NA1085 .L44 2016

Library - Art Library, Location - OSIZ, Call number - FOLIO N6490 .P796 2016

CRUD (Create, Read, Update, and Delete) operations are used in the web application for the data manipulation in the database. There are four basic operations involved in the CRUD functionality that help to manage data with the database. We have already shared the tutorial to perform create (insert), read (select), update, and delete operations in PHP CRUD Operations with MySQL. In this tutorial, we will build PHP CRUD application with PostgreSQL server. PostgreSQL also known as Postgres is a relational database management system (RDBMS). The PostgreSQL database is open-source and free to use. We will connect with the PostgreSQL Server

The post PHP CRUD Operations with PostgreSQL Server appeared first on CodexWorld.

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Dynamic company in the broadcast industry is looking for a PR and Marketing Writer (company located in in Airport City)

To create and maintain content to support companies overall sales and marketing plan, and to increase industry awareness and company brand in order to support and marketing efforts.

Main Accountabilities

• Work with marketing team on preparing and supporting PR and marketing strategy
• Create press releases, case studies, marketing white papers, company briefs and FAQs, and contributed articles/advertorials in support of marketing strategy
• Identify and organize speaking engagements and assist in the preparation of the needed presentations
• Organize and support interviews of companies executives with the print and online media
• Interview clients, managers, engineers, sales staff and others to collect information
• Prepare scripts for videos and similar promotional material
• Prepare content for customer e-newsletter
• Prepare content for internal sales and marketing training and sales and marketing internal portal
• Support the company as needs arise for proofing, writing and other ad hoc projects
• Support presence as exhibitors at trade industry exhibitions by preparing messaging, arranging press interviews, etc.
• To increase media and analyst awareness as measured by articles written about the company or within which they are discussed

• Minimum 3-5 years experience as a marketing writer and with direct international PR responsibilities for a high-tech company preferably in a related field
• Strong written and verbal communication skills in English (mother tongue) with the specific ability to understand and convey technical information in a non-technical manner and to prepare marketing material
• An understanding of the satellite and broadcast industry a definite plus

Responsibilities

• Provide client support and technical issue resolution via E-Mail, phone and other electronic medium.
• Moderating the company's customer support forum
• Updating self-help documents so customers/employees can try to fix problems themselves
• Logging and keeping records of customer/employee queries
• Identify and correct or advise, on operational issues in client website or company systems.
• Working with customers/partners to identify service problems and advising on the solution
• Analyzing service information to spot common trends and underlying problems

• 3 years as a technical customer support representative/engineer
• Ability to build a web 2.0 support practice from the ground up (self help capabilities, forums etc.)
• Experience with website hosting/security/performance and DNS management
• Excellent communication (oral and written), interpersonal, organizational, and presentation skills.
• Fluent spoken and written English
• Self motivated, detail-oriented and organized.

• Experience working at a SaaS company preferably a B2C or B2B (SMB – small customers)
• Provided "Web2.0 technical support" (over mail, chat, phone with automated and advanced customer support tools)
• The ability to write very good documentation in English(FAQ, How to's, technical notes)
• Experience with a 24*7 lean support operations (using external answering services or off-shored resources)

Send cover letter and CV to rzauer@kenes.com

SEO Manager

• SEO and PPC campaigns for medical congresses around the world

• Design for web, email, and online banners

It's not just the pros who want control. Over the weekend the NCAA ejected a Louisville Courier-Journal reporter from a college baseball championship for live-blogging the game. Brian Bennet reports that he had been posting updates throughout the game on his Courier-Journal blog, until, at the bottom of the fifth inning, "an NCAA representative came to my seat on press row and asked for my credential and asked me to leave. I complied."

Apparently, according to a memo NCAA circulated, the college athletic association believes that live-blogging interferes with its revenue streams from broadcast licenses:

The College World Series Media Coordination staff along with the NCAA Broadcasting group needs to remind all media coordinators that any statistical or other live representation of the Super Regional games falls under the exclusive broadcasting and Internet rights granted to the NCAA's official rights holders and therefore is not allowed by any other entity. Since blogs are considered a live representation of the game, any blog that has action photos or game reports, including play-by-play, scores or any in-game updates, is specifically prohibited. In essence, no blog entries are permitted between the first pitch and the final out of each game.

Now there are legal and policy questions here: First off, this wasn't a copyright or misappropriation claim. If the reporter had watched or listened to a broadcast and blogged details from there, the NCAA would have no claim against him (see NBA v. Motorola, where the basketball association lost just such a claim). It can't claim ownership of the facts, even if it currently makes money from selling privileged access to the facts.

Instead, the NCAA was clamping down on the data through a claimed right to control physical access to the game, at least to the press box. Was the NCAA within its legal rights to revoke a press credential? Probably. The NCAA has no obligation to issue press credentials, and apart from anti-discrimination law, can condition them on whatever arbitrary terms it likes. But David Price points out another twist: The University of Louisville, where the game was played, is a public institution, subject to First Amendment limitations on the speech-limiting rules it can impose. Can it ban speech or allow others to do so on its space based on claimed disruption to a business deal? Does it depend whether a baseball stadium is a "public forum"? (Under current law, it's probably not.)

Finally, there's the policy. Even if banning bloggers is legally permissible, it;s silly. Silly of the NCAA to think it can keep up this kind of control, silly of licensees to see blogs as a substitute to what they're licensing, and silly of schools to endorse and accept such policies for their student athletes' games. Exclusivity of facts is unlikely to last long in practice, as the Courier-Journal reports: "The Oregonian newspaper in Portland decided to work around the rules by blogging Oregon State's game against Michigan on Sunday off a radio broadcast in its newsroom, said its executive editor, Peter Bhatia. He said the newspaper heard no objections from the NCAA and planned to do the same yesterday."

"AT&T Inc. has joined Hollywood studios and recording companies in trying to keep pirated films, music and other content off its network — the first major carrier of Internet traffic to do so," the LA Times reports. So customers will pay in added overhead and false positives, while filesharers adapt to evade the filtering (for both infringing and non-infringing traffic). Who wins? The sellers of filtering snake-oil tech, perhaps.

"Slow. Expensive. Unreliable. Unverifiable." Those don't sound like the specs you'd put in a procurement document for a system undergirding electoral democracy, but they're the words Jason Kitcat used repeatedly to describe what Open Rights Group found when it observed the use of e-voting in England and Scotland's pilot trial of the technologies in May 2007.

Speaking at the release of ORG's election report, Kitcat described failures that ORG's volunteer observers saw or had reported to them. In Rushmoor, a candidate reported that the online ballot mis-identified his opponent's party affiliation. In Breckland, a manual recount of non-electronic ballots initially counted by computer turned up more than 50% more votes than the e-count. At least Breckland had a non-electronic ballot to fall back upon. In fully electronic systems being adopted in other districts, a "recount" can only repeat the same tally of bits, with no certain way to detect improper recording or tampering.

ORG concludes that, given the problems observed and the questions remaining unanswered, it cannot express confidence in the results declared in areas observed. Given these findings, ORG remains opposed to the introduction of e-voting and e-counting in the United Kingdom.

Unfortunately, but unsurprisingly, ORG's findings mirror those of EFF and others regarding United States deployment of e-voting. In a process led by vendors, veiled in proprietary trade secrecy, with inadequate attention to the security and verification required for confidence in democratic elections, e-voting and non-transparent e-counting do not serve the American or British citizenry. ORG is taking great steps to expose the flaws and push for more accountable voting.

According to observers and civil society NGO participants, the WIPO Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights will not recommend a Diplomatic Conference on the proposed WIPO Broadcasting Treaty. In non-WIPO-ese, that means broadcasters won't get the unjustified grant of copyright-plus rights they've been asking for. Instead, they'll still have copyright protection for their programs, while the public will get its fair use without an extra layer of exclusion.

From Intellectual Property Watch » WIPO Broadcasting Treaty Talks Break Down:

World Intellectual Property Organization negotiations for a treaty on rights for broadcasters broke down at the eleventh hour, according to participating government officials. A high-level final treaty negotiation scheduled for November will not take place, they said.

The SCCR, which does its work through "non-papers" and meetings in Geneva, has been pushing for a broadcasting treaty for nearly a decade. It was nearing its conclusion, sending the draft on to a Diplomatic Conference to be adopted as an international treaty, when delegates apparently finally recognized they could not reach consensus. The latest draft would have added DRM-protection, anti-circumvention, and new exclusive rights to broadcasts, threatening innovations like TiVo and SlingBox. While the United States was at most stages willing to sell out its innovators, even pushing at times for grant of new "webcasting" exclusive rights, Brazil, India, and the Africa Group took the lead in rejecting a new treaty if it lacked public rights and exceptions to balance those granted to broadcasters.

EFF and KEI, among others, have been keeping this process under scrutiny for a long time. Amazing how similar the debates look to what I first helped live-blog in 2004.

Update: Not dead yet? Jamie Love reports the "surreal" draft conclusions of the Chair, that a Diplomatic Conference should be held in 2008.

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Main Library- HV6250.4.W65N78 2011

Location: Main Media Collection - Video record 42436 DVD

Location: Main Media Collection - Video record 42435 DVD

Location: Main Media Collection - Video record 42434 DVD

Location: Main Media Collection - Video record 42433 DVD

Location: Main Media Collection - Video record 42432 DVD

Location: Main Media Collection - Video record 42429 DVD

Location: Government Information - J 16.1:929-30/SUPP.

Location: Main Oversize- HQ281.G555 2014

Location: Law Library- JC328.6V56 2016

Location: Main Library- HA19.B447 2016

Location: Government Information - J 1.42/3:SD-J-4

Location: Government Information - J 1.42/3:SD-JD-2

Location: Government Information - J 1.44:L 89

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Government Information - J 16.2:P 93/2/953-56

Location: Rita Benton Music Sound Recording- Audio record 41001 CD

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Electronic Resource- 

Location: Electronic Resource-