ni Browning v. Baker By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2017-09-20T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Ninth Circuit) - Reversing the district court's denial of habeas corpus to a petitioner challenging his conviction for crimes involving the robbery and murder of a man in a Las Vegas jewelry store that resulted in the death penalty because a combination of prosecutorial misconduct and woefully inadequate assistance of counsel produced an extreme malfunction in the state criminal justice system. Full Article Legal Malpractice Habeas Corpus Ethics & Professional Responsibility Criminal Law & Procedure
ni Diaz v. Professional Community Management, Inc. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2017-11-08T08:00:00+00:00 (California Court of Appeal) - Concluding that a defendant and their counsel unilaterally created an appeal-able order by making a motion in bad faith with the intention of creating a series of appeals that would forestall and damage the ability to proceed to trial and affirmed the denial of a motion to compel arbitration filed 11 days before the scheduled trial on its merits and imposing monetary sanctions on the defense an counsel for bringing a frivolous appeal. Full Article Civil Procedure Ethics & Professional Responsibility Dispute Resolution & Arbitration
ni Medical Board of California v. The Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-01-08T08:00:00+00:00 (California Court of Appeal) - Granting a writ petition in the case of a doctor who contested the introduction of arrest records relating to his conviction for possession of cocaine in professional misconduct proceedings and the tension between the Penal Code section stating that successful completion of a diversion program should not be used in a way that could result in the loss of a license and the Business and Professions Code section stating that the successful completion of diversion does not prohibit the agency from taking disciplinary action, holding that the latter statute was controlling. Full Article Evidence Ethics & Professional Responsibility Administrative Law
ni Doe v. Superior Court (Southwestern Community College District) By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2019-06-13T08:00:00+00:00 (California Court of Appeal) - Held that a lawyer should not have been disqualified from representing a student-employee at a community college in a sexual harassment case. He did not violate California State Bar Rules of Professional Conduct concerning communications with represented parties when he contacted another student-employee seeking a witness statement. Granted writ relief. Full Article Ethics & Professional Responsibility Labor & Employment Law
ni Skulason v. California Bureau of Real Estate By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2017-08-16T08:00:00+00:00 (California Court of Appeal) - Reversing a trial court judgment granting writ of mandate and the award of attorney's fees in the case of a real estate salesperson who sued a state agency for publicizing her three misdemeanor convictions because they had no mandatory duty to remove from their website information about a licensee's convictions even if they were eventually dismissed. Full Article Cyberspace Law Media Law Communications Law
ni Eil v. US Drug Enforcement Administration By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2017-12-22T08:00:00+00:00 (United States First Circuit) - Reversing a district court decision relating to the release of private individuals' medical documents under the Freedom of Information Act in a case brought by a journalist conducting research because the balancing of public interest in disclosure and the relevant privacy interests was flawed due to the court's application of the wrong standard because the release of the documents was unlikely to advance a valid public interest and substantial privacy interests implicated by the records outweighed the interest in disclosure. Full Article Health Law Media Law
ni Halleck v. Manhattan Community Access Corporation By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-02-09T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Second Circuit) - Affirming the dismissal for failure to state a claim allegations of First Amendment violations by the City of New York, but reversing as to Manhattan Community Access Corporation and its employees because public access TV channels are a public forum and the corporation and its employees were state actors when they fired workers who produced segments critical of the corporation. Full Article Constitutional Law Media Law Communications Law Entertainment Law
ni National Conference of Black Mayors v. Chico Community Publishing, Inc. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-07-25T08:00:00+00:00 (California Court of Appeal) - Affirmed an order denying attorney's fees to a newspaper that had been forced to litigate over its request for public records. The newspaper argued that it was entitled to reasonable attorney's fees under the California Public Records Act. However, the Third Appellate District disagreed, holding that the Act does not allow for an award of attorney fees when the requester litigates against an officer of a public agency in a mandamus action that the officer initiated to keep the public agency from disclosing records it agreed to disclose. Full Article Attorney's Fees Media Law Government Law
ni American Civil Liberties Union v. US Department of Defense By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-08-22T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Second Circuit) - Held that the U.S. government was justified in refusing to release certain photographs of detainees taken by U.S. Army personnel at military detention facilities in Afghanistan and Iraq. The American Civil Liberties Union and several other organizations demanded that the photographs be released under the Freedom of Information Act. The government countered that the photographs were shielded from disclosure by a 2009 law, the Protected National Security Documents Act. Agreeing with the government, the Second Circuit reversed the district court's order granting summary judgment for the plaintiffs and remanded with directions to enter judgment for the government. Full Article Military Law Media Law Government Law
ni Sander v. State Bar of California By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-08-23T08:00:00+00:00 (California Court of Appeal) - Held that the State Bar of California did not have to disclose information from its database. For social science research purposes, the petitioners sought anonymized data about all individuals who took the California bar examination from 1972 to 2008, including their race or ethnicity, law school and undergraduate grade point averages, LSAT scores, and performance on the bar examination. Affirming the denial of a writ of mandate, the California First Appellate District held that such a request was beyond the purview of the California Public Records Act because it would compel the State Bar to create new records. Full Article Media Law Government Law
ni National Association of African American-Owned Media v. Charter Communications, Inc. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-11-19T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Ninth Circuit) - Held that an African American-owned operator of television networks sufficiently pleaded a claim that a cable television operator refused to enter into a carriage contract based on racial bias, in violation of 42 U.S.C. section 1981. Also, the section 1981 claim was not barred by the First Amendment. On interlocutory appeal, affirmed denial of a motion to dismiss. Full Article Entertainment Law Media Law Civil Rights
ni National Association of African American-Owned Media v. Charter Communications, Inc. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2019-02-04T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Ninth Circuit) - In an amended opinion, held that an African American-owned operator of television networks sufficiently pleaded that a cable television operator unlawfully refused to enter into a carriage contract based on racial bias, in violation of 42 U.S.C. section 1981. Affirmed denial of a motion to dismiss, on interlocutory appeal. Full Article Media Law Civil Rights Communications Law
ni Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2019-06-17T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Supreme Court) - Held that a private entity operating public access cable TV channels was not subject to First Amendment constraints on its editorial discretion. The producers of a controversial documentary film contended that the nonprofit corporation running the public access channels was a state actor because it was exercising a function traditionally exclusively reserved to the State, and therefore was subject to suit for violating their free speech rights. However, the U.S. Supreme Court disagreed. Justice Kavanaugh delivered the opinion of the 5-4 Court. Full Article Media Law Communications Law Constitutional Law
ni In Re Irving Tanning Company By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2017-12-04T08:00:00+00:00 (United States First Circuit) - Affirming bankruptcy court and district court rulings that a transaction involving the debt-financed purchase of a family owned leather manufacturer was not a fraudulent conveyance and did not amount to a violation of the fiduciary duties of the company's directors because the factual determinations were not clearly erroneous and supported the court's conclusions. Full Article Bankruptcy Law Corporation & Enterprise Law Corp. Governance
ni Heavenly Hana LLC v. Hotel Union & Hotel Industry of Hawaii Pension Plan By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-06-01T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Ninth Circuit) - Reversing a district court judgment to the plaintiffs following a bench trail in an action under the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendment Act because the plaintiffs were required to assume the unpaid withdrawal liability of their predecessor to a multiemployer pension plan, a constructive notice standard applied and a reasonable purchaser would have been aware of the liability. Full Article Civil Procedure Labor & Employment Law Corporation & Enterprise Law
ni California Public Utilities Comm. v. Superior Court By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2016-08-31T08:00:00+00:00 (California Court of Appeal) - In a petition for writ of mandamus and complaint for injunctive and declaratory relief against the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) for failing to comply with the the Public Records Act (PRA), Government Code sections 6250-6276.48, the petition is granted where Public Utilities Code section 1759 bars the superior court from exercising jurisdiction over such a lawsuit. Full Article Public Utilities Government Law
ni S. California Alliance of Publicly Owned Treatment Works v. US Environtmental Protection Agency By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2017-04-12T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Ninth Circuit) - In a petition for review challenging an Objection Letter sent by the EPA regarding draft permits for water reclamation plants in El Monte and Pomona, California, the petition is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction where neither 33 U.S.C. section 1369(b)(1)(E) nor (F) of the Clean Water Act provided the court with subject matter jurisdiction to review the Objection Letter. Full Article Public Utilities Water Law Administrative Law Environmental Law
ni California Pub. Utilities Comm'n v. Fed. Energy Reg. Comm'n By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2017-04-21T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Ninth Circuit) - In a petition for review brought by various entities challenging the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)'s calculation of certain refunds arising out of the California energy crisis in 2000 and 2001, the petition is: 1) granted in part where FERC acted arbitrarily or capriciously in allocating the refund only to net buyers and not to all market participants; and 2) denied in part as to the question of whether refunds should be netted hourly or a cross the entire refund period where FERC did not act arbitrarily or capriciously in its construction of tariffs. Full Article Public Utilities Administrative Law Oil and Gas Law
ni Plantier v. Ramona Municipal Water Dist. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2017-06-13T08:00:00+00:00 (California Court of Appeal) - In a class action against a Water District challenging the method used by District to calculate wastewater service 'fees or charges' between about 2012 and 2014, the trial court's judgment in favor of defendant, holding that plaintiffs failed to exhaust their administrative remedies under article XIII D of the California Constitution, is reversed where: 1) plaintiffs' class action is not barred by their failure to exhaust the administrative remedies set forth in section 6 because plaintiffs' substantive challenge involving the method used by District to calculate its wastewater service fees or charges is outside the scope of the administrative remedies; and 2) under the facts of this case, those remedies are, in any event, inadequate. Full Article Public Utilities Water Law Class Actions Constitutional Law Administrative Law
ni Wilson v. Southern California Edison Company By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-03-26T08:00:00+00:00 (California Court of Appeal) - Reversing the judgment and remanding the case of a woman whose home had a distressing electric charge, particularly in the shower, as the result of a power plant next door because the trial court erred in admitting irrelevant evidence relating to stray voltage incidents involving prior owners and tenants and that the admission of that evidence was prejudicial. Full Article Public Utilities Injury & Tort Law Civil Procedure
ni World Business Academy v. California State Lands Commission By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-06-13T08:00:00+00:00 (California Court of Appeal) - Affirming the denial of an administrative writ and declaratory relief in the case of a Pacific Gas and Electric Company lease extension on two long term leases on land used for water intake and discharge for a nuclear power plant because the lease replacement was subject to the existing facilities categorical exemption to the California Environmental Quality Act's environmental impact report requirement and the unusual circumstances exception did not apply. Full Article Environmental Law Public Utilities Administrative Law
ni Californians for Renewable Energy v. California Public Utilities Commission By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2019-04-24T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Ninth Circuit) - Addressed small-scale solar energy producers' claims that the California Public Utilities Commission's programs do not comply with federal requirements. Affirmed in part and reversed in part. Full Article Public Utilities
ni BAE Systems Technology Solution and Services, Inc. v. Republic of Korea's Defense Acquisition Program Administration By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-03-06T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Fourth Circuit) - Affirming the district court's grant of a declaratory judgment to the plaintiff that it hadn't breached any contractual agreement with Korea, but refusing a permanent injunction barring Korea from suing them in Korean courts in a contract suit between a US defense contractor and Korea in a complex set of exchanges involved in upgrading the country's fighter planes. Full Article Civil Procedure International Trade International Law Contracts
ni Quanta Computer Inc. v. Japan Communications Inc. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-03-16T08:00:00+00:00 (California Court of Appeal) - Affirming that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing a suit between Taiwanese and Japanese companies whose contract had nothing at all to do with California, but still named it as the forum for the resolution of disputes, because it was not an abuse of discretion when the court determined that suitable alternative forums exist and California had no interest in the suit. Full Article Civil Procedure International Trade Contracts
ni Animal Science Products, Inc. v. Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical Co. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-06-14T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Supreme Court) - Vacating and remanding the Second Circuit's support of a motion to dismiss a complaint relating to allegations that Chinese sellers of Vitamin C were engaged in price and quantity fixing of exports to the US because although the Ministry of Commerce of the People's Republic of China averred that the alleged price fixing scheme was actually a pricing regime mandated by the Chinese Government the court was not bound to accord conclusive effect to the foreign government's statements. No law or regulation had been cited and a foreign nation's laws must be proven as facts. Full Article International Law International Trade Commercial Law
ni Diebold Nixdorf, Inc. v. ITC By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-08-15T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Federal Circuit) - Reversed finding of the International Trade Commission (ITC) that plaintiff had violated Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 by importing components of automated teller machines that infringed on certain patents. The court reasoned that the term “cheque standby unit” is a means-plus-function term and lacks corresponding structure disclosed in the specification. Full Article International Trade Patent
ni Harmoni International Spice, Inc. v. Hume By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2019-01-23T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Ninth Circuit) - Revived a RICO lawsuit brought by importers of garlic who alleged that rival importers had conspired to harm their businesses. Reversed a dismissal in relevant part and remanded. Full Article International Trade Antitrust & Trade Regulation
ni GATEWAY INC. v. COMPANION PRODS. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2004-09-13T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Eighth Circuit) - Defendant's product infringed plaintiff-Gateway's black and white cow and spots trademark where the spots have acquired distinctiveness through secondary meaning, is not functional, and is entitled to protection. Full Article Intellectual Property Trade Dress Trademark
ni ITC Ltd. v. Punchgini, Inc. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2007-03-28T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Second Circuit) - Summary judgment for defendants on claims of trademark infringement, unfair competition, and related false advertising is reversed in part pending response of the New York Court of Appeals to the following certified questions: 1) Does New York common law permit the owner of a famous mark or trade dress to assert property rights therein by virtue of the owner's prior use of the mark or dress in a foreign country?; and 2) If so, how famous must a foreign mark be to permit a foreign mark owner to bring a claim for unfair competition? Full Article Antitrust & Trade Regulation False Advertising Intellectual Property International Law Trade Dress Trademark
ni UT Lighthouse Ministry v. Found. for Apologetic Info. and Research By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2008-05-29T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Tenth Circuit) - In an action claiming trademark infringement, unfair competition, and cybersquatting, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where: 1) trademark infringement and unfair competition claims failed as plaintiff did not show that "Utah Lighthouse" was protectable, that defendant's use was in connection with any goods or services, and that defendant was likely to cause confusion among consumers as to the source of goods sold on its online bookstore; 2) defendant lacked a bad faith intent to profit from the use of plaintiff's trademark in several domain names under the Anti-Cybersquatting Protection Act (ACPA); and 3) defendant's website met safe harbor conditions of the ACPA since it was a parody. Full Article Commercial Law Cyberspace Law Intellectual Property Trade Dress Trademark
ni Bd. of Supervisors for La. State Univ. Agric. & Mech. Coll. v. Smack Apparel Co. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2008-11-25T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Fifth Circuit) - In a trademark dispute alleging that defendant infringed trademarks by selling t-shirts with several universities' color schemes and other identifying indicia referencing the games of the schools' football teams, summary judgment for plaintiffs is affirmed where: 1) the color schemes had secondary meaning and, although unregistered, were protectible marks; 2) there was a likelihood of confusion connecting the marks and the universities themselves; 3) the marks at issue were nonfunctional and thus subject to Lanham Act protection; 4) defendants' use of the marks was not a nominative fair use; 5) the defense of laches did not apply; 6) actual confusion was not a prerequisite to an award of money damages; and 7) plaintiffs were not entitled to attorneys' fees. Full Article Antitrust & Trade Regulation Attorney's Fees Education Law Intellectual Property Sports Law Trade Dress Trademark
ni Bd. of Supervisors for La. State Univ. Agric. & Mech. Coll. v. Smack Apparel Co. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2008-12-15T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Fifth Circuit) - In a trademark dispute alleging that defendant infringed trademarks by selling t-shirts with several universities' color schemes and other identifying indicia referencing the games of the schools' football teams, summary judgment for plaintiffs is affirmed where: 1) the color schemes had secondary meaning and, although unregistered, were protectible marks; 2) there was a likelihood of confusion connecting the marks and the universities themselves; 3) the marks at issue were nonfunctional and thus subject to Lanham Act protection; 4) defendants' use of the marks was not a nominative fair use; 5) the defense of laches did not apply; 6) actual confusion was not a prerequisite to an award of money damages; and 7) plaintiffs were not entitled to attorneys' fees. (Revised opinion) Full Article Education Law Intellectual Property Sports Law Trade Dress Trademark
ni Amazing Spaces, Inc. v. Metro Mini Storage By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2010-06-03T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Fifth Circuit) - In an action alleging infringement of a star design that plaintiff claimed as a service mark, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed in part where: 1) the record evidence was replete with similar or identical five-pointed stars, both raised and set in circles, and used in similar manners, such that -- notwithstanding the residual evidence of the presumption of validity -- no reasonable jury could find that the star symbol was even a mere refinement of this commonly adopted and well-known form of ornamentation; and 2) plaintiff failed to raise a fact issue regarding the existence of secondary meaning with respect to the symbol. However, the judgment is reversed in part where plaintiff had not yet had the opportunity to introduce evidence relating to its trade dress claims. Full Article Commercial Law Intellectual Property Trade Dress Trademark
ni Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., LTD. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2013-11-18T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Federal Circuit) - The district court's denial of plaintiff's request for a permanent injunction to enjoin defendants' infringement of several of plaintiff's design and utility patents, as well as defendants' dilution of plaintiff's iPhone trade dress is: 1) affirmed in part, as to the denial of injunctive relief with respect to plaintiff's design patents and trade dress; but 2) vacated in part and remanded, as to the denial of injunctive relief with respect to plaintiff's utility patents. Full Article Intellectual Property Patent Trade Dress International Law
ni Apple v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2015-05-18T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Federal Circuit) - In an infringement case involving intellectual property related to the iPhone,a jury verdict finding that Samsung infringed Apple's design and utility patents and diluted Apple's trade dress is: 1) affirmed as to the verdict on the design patent infringement, the validity of two utility patent claims, and the damages for the design and utility patent infringements; and 2) reversed as to the jury's findings that the asserted trade dresses are protectable; and 3) vacated as to the damages awards against the Samsung productsthat were found liable for trade dress dilution. Full Article Intellectual Property Patent Trade Dress
ni Millennium Laboratories, Inc. v. Ameritox, Ltd. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2016-04-04T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Ninth Circuit) - In a trade dress action, the district court's grant of summary judgment to defendant is reversed where there is a genuine fact issue as to whether plaintiff's manner for presenting results in its urine test report was functional under the Lanham Act. Full Article Trade Dress Intellectual Property
ni Direct Technologies, LLC v. Electronic Arts, Inc. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2016-09-06T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Ninth Circuit) - In a copyright infringement and trade secret case arising out of a contract for plaintiff to produce a USB flash drive shaped like a 'PlumbBob' a gem-shaped icon from defendant's computer game, The Sims, the District Court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant is: 1) affirmed in part as to the trade secrets claim, although on different grounds. where plaintiff's contribution to the PlumbBob USB drive, a design for the flash drive’s removal from the PlumbBob object, did not derive independent economic value from not being generally known to the public; and 2) reversed in part as to the copyright infringement claim where the district court erred in ruling as a matter of law that the flash drive was not sufficiently original when compared to the Plumb Bob icon to qualify for copyright protection as a derivative work. Full Article Trade Dress Copyright Cyberspace Law
ni Medtronic, Inc. v. Barry By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-06-11T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Federal Circuit) - Affirming in part and vacating in part the US Patent and Trademark Office's Patent Trial and Appeals Board inter partes review determination that a medical device company had not proven that the challenged patent claims were unpatentable in a suit relating to thoracic pedicle screws for scoliosis surgery. Full Article Intellectual Property Patent
ni Adidas AG v. Nike, Inc. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-07-02T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Federal Circuit) - Granted plaintiff's motion to remand. In light of the US Supreme Court decision, SAS Institute, Inc. v. Iancu, 138 S.Ct. 1348, plaintiff moved to remand to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board for further proceedings. The Federal Circuit reasoned that the decision in SAS established a process where the petitioner gets to define the proceeding and that all challenges raised in the petitions are to receive review by the Board. Full Article Intellectual Property Patent
ni Texas Advanced Optoelectronic Solutions, Inc. v. Renesas Electronics America, Inc. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-07-09T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Federal Circuit) - In a patent infringement action, arising after two manufacturers of ambient light sensors shared technical and financial information during negotiations for a possible merger, the appeals court affirmed in part, reversed in part, and vacated in part a jury verdict for plaintiff as follows: 1) defendant's liability for trade secret misappropriation regarding a photodiode array structure was affirmed; 2) several patent infringement claims were reversed and several were affirmed; and 3) monetary damage awards were vacated and remanded for further consideration. Full Article Trade Secrets Patent
ni Blackbird Tech LLC v. ELB Electronics Inc. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-07-16T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Federal Circuit) - Vacated a patent noninfringement judgment based on an erroneous construction of the patent's language. The sole issue on appeal concerned a patent pertaining to energy efficient lighting apparatuses and what precisely was meant by the words attachment surface. Because the district court had adopted an erroneous construction of those words, the Federal Circuit vacated the judgment of noninfringement and remanded for further proceedings. Full Article Intellectual Property Patent
ni Trustees of Boston University v. Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-07-25T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Federal Circuit) - Held that a patent claim relating to light-emitting diodes was invalid because it did not meet the enablement requirement. After a jury found that the defendants had infringed Boston University's patent, the defendants appealed on the ground that the patent was invalid because it did not adequately teach the public how to make and use the invention. Agreeing with this argument, the Federal Circuit held that the defendants were entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Full Article Intellectual Property Patent
ni Diebold Nixdorf, Inc. v. ITC By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-08-15T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Federal Circuit) - Reversed finding of the International Trade Commission (ITC) that plaintiff had violated Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 by importing components of automated teller machines that infringed on certain patents. The court reasoned that the term “cheque standby unit” is a means-plus-function term and lacks corresponding structure disclosed in the specification. Full Article International Trade Patent
ni Click-to-Call Tech. v. Ingenio, Inc. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-08-16T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Federal Circuit) - Remanded with instructions to dismiss, in a case where the Federal Circuit concluded that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board erred in determining that certain claims were not time-barred under 35 USC section 314. Full Article Patent Administrative Law
ni University of California v. Broad Institute, Inc. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-09-10T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Federal Circuit) - Affirmed a judgment of no interference-in-fact in a patent case involving the CRISPR-Cas9 system for the targeted cutting of DNA molecules. The Federal Circuit found no error in the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's conclusion of no interference-in-fact, in this case pitting the Broad Institute, Inc., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and others against the University of California, the University of Vienna, and others. Full Article Patent Intellectual Property Drugs & Biotech
ni IXI IP, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-09-10T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Federal Circuit) - Affirmed that certain patent claims relating to a wireless networking device were invalid as obvious. The Federal Circuit affirmed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in an inter partes review proceeding. Full Article Intellectual Property Patent
ni Xitronix Corp. v. KLA-Tencor Corp. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2019-02-15T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Fifth Circuit) - The Fifth Circuit transferred a case back to the Federal Circuit, from which it had been transferred. The two circuits disagreed about which one was the proper forum for this appeal, which involved a company's claim that a competitor violated antitrust law by obtaining a patent through fraud. Full Article Antitrust & Trade Regulation Patent
ni People v. Nicholson By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2016-02-18T08:00:00+00:00 (Court of Appeals of New York) - Conviction for sexual conduct against a child in the first degree is affirmed where the trial court did not commit reversible error in admitting rebuttal testimony intended prove defendant’s sole witness was biased and motivated to fabricate evidence. The Court clarified that the Appellate Division may rely on the record to discern an unarticulated predicate for the trial court’s evidentiary rulings. Full Article Evidence Judges & Judiciary Criminal Law & Procedure
ni Chanko v. Am. Broadcasting Companies By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2016-03-31T08:00:00+00:00 (Court of Appeals of New York) - In an injury and tort action, brought against defendants ABC News, a hospital, and attending physician for the nonconsensual filming and subsequent broadcast of decedent's treatment and death at the hospital, the Appellative Division's order is modified and affirmed where: 1) the broadcasting of the footage as part of a documentary series about medical trauma was not so extreme and outrageous as to support an intentional infliction of emotional distress claim; but 2) plaintiffs have stated a cause of action against the hospital and treating physician for breach of physician-patient confidentiality. Full Article Health Law Injury & Tort Law Media Law
ni Yaniveth R. v. LTD Realty Co. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2016-04-05T08:00:00+00:00 (Court of Appeals of New York) - In a personal injury action, arising after plaintiff, a minor child, was exposed to lead at her grandmother's apartment where she was cared for during the day, the Supreme Court's dismissal of the complaint is affirmed where plaintiff child' did not 'reside' at her grandmother's apartment for the purposes of section 27-2013[h][1] of the Administrative Code of the City of NY, which requires landlords to remove lead-based paint in any dwelling in which a child six year of age and under resides. Full Article Injury & Tort Law Entertainment Law Landlord Tenant Law