Arduino’s MKR family of products got two new wireless connectivity boards added to its range of products. These include MKR WiFi 1010 and MKR NB 1500, both aimed at streamlining IoT product/service development.

Arduino’s blog notes that “the Arduino MKR WiFi 1010 is the new version of the MKR1000 with ESP32 module on board made by U-BLOX.”

MKR WiFi 1010: For prototyping of WI-FI based IoT applications

The core difference of MKR WiFi 1010 compared to MKR WiFi 1000 is that the former can be put to use in production-grade IoT apps and it has ESP32-based module manufactured by u-blox. The former enables to add 2.4GHz WiFi and Bluetooth capability to the application. Additionally, it comes with a programmable dual-processor system (an ARM processor and a dual-core Espressif IC).

MKR NB 1500: For on-field monitoring systems and remote-controlled LTE-enabled modules

The Arduino MKR NB 1500 is based on new low-power NB-IoT (narrowband IoT) standard. This makes it appropriate for IoT apps running over cellular/LTE networks.

Key use cases of this board are remote monitoring systems and remote-controlled LTE-enabled modules. It supports AT&T, T-Mobile USA, Telstra, Verizon over the Cat M1/NB1 deployed bands 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 12, 13, 20 and 28.

Arduino also pitches this board to be used in IoT apps which used to rely on alternative IoT networks such as LoRa and Sigfox. It promises to save power compared to GSM or 3G cellular-based connections.

[The Conversation Africa] South Africa's finance minister, Enoch Godongwana, announced in his October mid-term budget policy statement that cabinet had approved funding for an early retirement programme to reduce the public sector wage bill. R11 billion (about US$627 million) will be allocated over the next two years to pay for the exit costs of 30,000 civil servants while retaining critical skills and promoting the entry of younger talent.

[SAnews.gov.za] With the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP29) taking place this week, South Africa expects the COP29 Presidency to enhance efforts to finalise the New Collective Quantified Goal on Finance (NCQG), which is a matter of great importance for developing economies.

[allAfrica]

[allAfrica]

[The Conversation Africa] Despite the flaws in the latest novel by South African writer Nthikeng Mohlele, there is something alluring about Revolutionaries' House. It is Mohlele's most political novel, and the parallels drawn between love and politics - and their pitfalls - are intriguing.

The market is trending towards integrating and stacking multiple chiplets into a single package to meet the growing demands of speed, connectivity, and intelligence.  However, designing and signing off chiplets and packages individually is time-...(read more)

Staying ahead of the curve is essential to meeting customer needs. Cadence has consistently demonstrated its commitment to innovation, and its latest IP portfolio available on TSMC's 3nm (N3) process is no exception. Today, rapid advancements in AI/ML, hyperscale computing (HPC), and the automotive industry are driving significant changes in technology. Let's explore the impressive array of IP that Cadence offers on this advanced node.

Memory Solutions: High-Speed and Power-Efficient

Cadence's DDR5 12.8G MRDIMM IP supports the highest speed grade Gen2 MRDIMMs and features a fully hardened PHY optimized to the customer's floorplan. The LPDDR5X IP is silicon-proven at 9.6Gbps and is ideal for power-sensitive applications, offering a fully integrated memory subsystem.

GDDR7: Leading the Way in Graphics Memory

Cadence has achieved a significant milestone with the world's first silicon-proven GDDR7 IP, supporting data rates up to 32Gbps. This IP offers the best price/performance ratio for AI interfaces, making it a game-changer in the graphics memory domain.

PCIe and CXL Solutions: Robust and Reliable

Cadence's PCIe 3.0 IP is a mature and production-proven solution available across a wide range of process nodes from 28nm to 3nm. It offers a versatile multi-link architecture for optimum SoC configurability and flexible use cases. The PCIe 6.0 and CXL 3.x solutions are silicon-proven, power-optimized, and highly robust, with jitter-tolerant capabilities. These IP are the only subsystem proven with eight lanes of controller and PHY in silicon, ensuring interoperability with leading test vendors and OEMs.

UCIe PHY: Setting New Standards

The UCIe PHY IP from Cadence are set to be generally available after successful silicon characterization in both standard and advanced package options on the TSMC N3 (3nm) process. These IP demonstrate significantly better power, performance, and area (PPA) metrics than the specifications, with a bit error rate (BER) better than 1E-27 compared to the spec of 1E-15. The power consumption is also notably lower than the spec limit, ensuring a simpler integration with a best-in-class power profile.

112G PHY IP: Pushing the Boundaries of Performance

Cadence's 112G PHY IP are designed to meet the demands of high-speed data transmission. The 112G-ULR PHY IP, characterized in the 3nm process, showcases exceptional performance with support for insertion loss over 45dB at data rates ranging from 1.25Gbps to 112.5Gbps. This IP is optimized for both power and area, making it a versatile choice for various applications. The 112G-VSR/MR PHY IP also stands out with its excellent power and performance metrics, making it ideal for short-reach applications and optical interconnects. Additionally, the 112G PAM4 PHY solutions cater to hyperscale, AI, HPC, and optics applications, featuring a mature DSP-based SerDes architecture with advanced techniques such as reflection cancellation.

Cadence's IP portfolio on TSMC N3 shows innovation and expertise to solve today's design challenges. From high-speed PHY IP to robust PCIe and CXL solutions and advanced memory IP, Cadence continues to lead the way in semiconductor IP development. These solutions not only meet but exceed industry standards, ensuring that customers can confidently achieve their design goals. Stay tuned for more updates on Cadence's groundbreaking advancements in semiconductor technology.

Learn more about Cadence IP and other silicon solutions.

LEF allows the same port with multiple shape definitions. Does anybody know if innovus can create multiple duplicate shapes associated with the same port? Assume they are connected outside the block with perfect timing synchronization. Thank you!

Hi there, 

we've encountered some strange behavior when trying to run the "check_litho" command from within INNOVUS 22.14. We set the required files and configuration files according to our PDK documentation. The command, without the absolute file paths, is:

check_litho -sign_off -cpu 96 -run_mode fg -create_guides -map_file <map file path> -config <config file path> -techfile <tech file path> -dir <output dir path> -write_stream_options "-mode ALL -merge <list of gds files>" -apply squishHints

We are currently using PEGASUSDFM 23.20 for this command but tested previous PEGASUSDFM and MVS versions as-well. After we issued the previous command, we see INNOVUS launching the PEGASUSDFM/MVS and trying to run the command. After some time, the command crashes with the error "mdb_load_with_extra: failed to pre-open extra input file './preproc/INTERMEDIATE.oas' for read". We have tested a similar setup with INNOVUS 19.10 where we did not have this issues. Did something change with the new INNOVUS version? Does anyone have an idea what we are missing? 

Thanks in advance.

Best regards,

PS

Hi everyone,

I'm designing a digital chip that will be fabricated. I have a HDL top module that includes several submodules inside it. I want to define the position of some of the submodules during the PnR so that later I can specify there positions in the Micrograph photo after the IC fabrication. When I perform the PnR using Innovus, I always got a layout shape where the submodules seems to be flatted. I wonder if there is a way to specify the placement of each submodule in my top module  (maybe in the tcl file) during the PnR so later I can define there positions in the micrograph photo. 

Thanks in Advance!

Hi everyone,

I'm new to using Innovus and I'm encountering an issue while trying to perform the "init_design" command. My goal is to perform the place and route. Here are the commands I'm using:

``
set init_verilog ./test.v
set init_top_cell TEST
set init_pwr_net {VDD VDD_2 VDD_3}
set init_gnd_net {VSS VSSA}
set init_lef_file { /home/laumecha/uw_openroad_free45/pdk/Drexel-ECEC575/Encounter/NangateOpenCellLibrary/Back_End/lef/NangateOpenCellLibrary.lef}
set init_mmmc_file {./viewDefinition.tcl}
init_design
```

However, I receive the following error:

```
#% Begin Load netlist data ... (date=06/04 12:07:50, mem=1478.7M)
*** Begin netlist parsing (mem=1439.0M) ***
Created 0 new cells from 0 timing libraries.
Reading netlist ...
Backslashed names will retain backslash and a trailing blank character.
**ERROR: (IMPVL-209):   In Verilog file './test.v', check line 16 near the text # for the issue: 'syntax error'.  Update the text accordingly.
Type 'man IMPVL-209' for more detail.
Verilog file './test.v' has errors!  See above.

*** Memory Usage v#1 (Current mem = 1439.027M, initial mem = 634.098M) ***
#% End Load netlist data ... (date=06/04 12:07:50, total cpu=0:00:00.0, real=0:00:00.0, peak res=1478.7M, current mem=1478.7M)
**ERROR: (IMPVL-902):   Failed to read netlist ./test.v. See previous error messages for details.  Resolve the issues and reload the design.
```

However, the file works perfectly in Genus.

It seems there is a syntax error in my Verilog file at line 16, but I'm not sure how to resolve it. Any guidance or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance!

Hi all,

I have been following the tutorial "Innovus Block Implementation with Stylus Common UI", version 23.1.

While I was doing the clock tree synthesis, the tutorial calls for a command

clock_opt_design

But my tool tells me this is a beta feature which needs to be enabled.

Warning: clock_opt_design requires beta feature innovusClockOptFlow enabled.

Can I ask how do I enable this beta feature?

My version of Innovus is v21.35-s114_1, is it because of the version incompatibility?

Many thanks

We are currently setting up the Tempus flow and have ran into some mismatched data regarding ECO and timing reports. I generated a timing report before running ECO and saw six total setup violations. When running opt_signoff -setup, the initial setup summary that was printed in the shell only showed one violation. I can see that violation from the initial setup summary in my pre-ECO timing report and it is not the worst path. Upon further investigation, I forced the tool to try to fix setup on one of the other five violations from the timing report using the opt_signoff_select_setup_endpoints attribute and the tool said that the endpoint had positive slack and would be ignored.

Has anyone experienced something like this before?

Hi, I'm using genus (Version 21.14-s082_1) to synthesis a VHDL-design with multiple power-domains. After reading the power intent file and calling 'apply_power_intent',  I get the following warning:

Warning : Potential problem while applying power intent of 1801 file. [1801-99]
: Cannot find any instance for scope '/:CHIP_TOP'. Rest of commands in this scope will be skipped (set_scope:../../upf/CHIP_TOP.upf:2).
: Check the power intent. If the scenario is expected, this message can be ignored.

The fist two lines of CHIP_TOP.upf:

upf_version 3.1
set_scope :CHIP_TOP

I simulated the same  UPF and VHDL files with Xeclium and was able to verify all the IEEE1801/UPF aspects I need without any problems. I don't know, why genus is having a problem with the 'scope'.
In genus, after getting the warning, running 'set_db power_domain:CHIP_TOP/BLOCK_A/PD_CORE_D .library_domain PD0V5' returns the following error:

Error : <Start> word is not recognized. [TUI-182] [set_db]
: 'power_domain:CHIP_TOP/BLOCK/PD_CORE_D' is not a recognized object/attribute. Type 'help root:' to get a list of all supported objects and attributes.
: Check if the given <Start> word is a valid object_type, object or attribute.

Running 'commit_power_intent' gives me:

Started inserting low power cells...
====================================
Info : Command 'commit_power_intent' cannot proceed as there are no power domains present. [CPI-507]
: Design with no power domains is 'design:CHIP_TOP'.
Completed inserting low power cells (runtime 0.00).
====================================================

I'm suspecting that the problem lies in 'set_scope' and VHDL. I never had such problems with Verilog. I tried every way to reference the hierarchy in the code and now I'm at my wit's end and I need your help o/
How to set the scope with 'set_scope' in UPD 3.1 to the toplevel in VHDL, so that genus accepts it? Or is the problem caused by something else?

Best,

Iqbal

for debug I use suspend in my tcl script to debug，here is the code

after that the innovus command screen become 

how to quit the SUSPEND status？ thanks

Hi all, 

I have made a custom cell in Innovus that I will be instantiating into a bigger block, which I will also be using Innovus to do the Place & Route. 

I understand that I can generate a *.lef file and a *.lib file using Innovus. However, I need to also create a *.db file (these format of files are often used in DC Compiler synthesis tool). 

Is there a way to create the *.db file from Innovus? Or, is there a tool that I can use to create this *.db file? 

Thank you for your time. 

Hi,

My query is regarding importing of layout.

After importing, we see that the imported transistor instances and vias are all referring to the library in which they are imported, instead of referring to the technology library.

Please let me know how we can refer them to the technology library.

Will surely provide more details if my query is unclear.

Thanks,

Mallikarjun.

Microwave Office is Cadence’s tool-of-choice for RF and microwave designers designing everything from III-V 5G chips, to RF systems in board and package technologies. These types of designs require close interaction between the schematic and its layout. A new Training Byte demonstrates how the schematic-layout connections is built into Microwave Office.(read more)

Data sets are a powerful and easy-to-use feature in Microwave Office. Data can be effortlessly be swapped in graphs, and circuit schematics.(read more)

Hello All:

I am looking for help on the following, as I am new to Cadence tools [I have to use Cadence Innovus for Physical Design after Logic Synthesis using Synopsys Design Compiler, using Nangate 45 nm Open Cell Library]: while using Cadence Innovus, I would need to select a few specific nets to be routed through a specific metal layer. How can I do this on Innovus [are there any command(s)]? Also, would writing and sourcing a .tcl script [containing the command(s)] on the Innovus terminal after the Placement Stage of Physical Design be fine for this?

Secondly, is there a way in Innovus to manipulate layout components, such as changing some pin placements, wire directions (say for example, wire direction changed to facing east from west, etc.) or moving specific closely placed cells around (without violating timing constraints of course) using any command(s)/.tcl script? If so, would pin placement changes and constraining some closely placed cells to be moved apart be done after Floorplanning/Powerplanning (that is, prior to Placement) and the wire direction changes be done after Routing? 

While making the necessary changes, could I use the usual Innovus commands to perform Physical Design of the remaining nets/wires/pins/cells, etc., or would anything need modification for the remaining components as well?

I would finally need to dump the entire design containing all of this in a .def file.

I tried looking up but could only find matter on Virtuoso and SKILL scripting, but I'd be using Innovus GUI/terminal with Nangate 45 nm Open Cell Library. I know this is a lot, but I would greatly appreciate your help. Thanks in advance.

Riya

Hi,

I have synthesized a verilog code. When performing the pnr in innovus it is showing the error "Instance g5891__718 (similar for other) of the cell AND2_X6 has no physical library or has wrong dimension  values (<=0). Check your design setup to make sure the physical library is loaded in and attribute specified in library are correct.

When importing synthesized netlist in virtuoso then it says " Module AND2_X6, instantiated in the top module decoder, is not defined. Therefore the top module decoder will be imported as functional."

Please help what's going on here? 

Hi, have two designs and would like to copy paste one area of circuit from the old design to the new design, best way/approach and guidance please..

hi

How can I tell the LEC tool to ignore a combination of Primary input bus in both Golden and revised.

For example in both Golden and revised there is 

input [3:0] data_in

I want LEC not to check the case that data_in[3:0] == 4'b1000

We have a big circuit having 12K gates totally and trying to show it in one page slide visually. But it is so hard for us to shrink it down from gate-level to module-level. Do you have any function like these:

• Toggle wires on and off
• “Right click” elements and group them into black boxes
• Quickly left or right align elements to clean up pictures

The OrCAD X and Allegro X 24.1 release is now available at Cadence Downloads. This blog post provides links to access the release and describes some major changes and new features.   OrCAD X /Allegro X 24.1 (SPB241) Here is a representative li...(read more)

Starting SPB 23.1, Allegro Package Designer Plus (APD+) has been rebranded as Allegro X Advanced Package Designer (Allegro X APD).

The splash screen for Allegro X APD will appear as shown below, instead of showing APD+ 2023:

For the Windows Start menu in 23.1, it will display as Allegro X APD 2023 instead of APD+ 2023, as shown below

23.1 Start menu 

In the Product Choices window for 23.1, you will see Allegro X Advanced Package Designer in the place of Allegro Package Designer +, as shown below: 

23.1 product title

The Sigrity and Systems Analysis (SIGRITY/SYSANLS) 2024.1 release is now available for download at Cadence Downloads . For the list of CCRs fixed in this release, see the README.txt file in the installation hierarchy. SIGRITY/SYSANLS 2024.1 Here is a list of some of the key updates in the SIGRITY/SYSANLS 2024.1 release: For more details about these and all the other new and enhanced features introduced in this release , refer to the following document: Sigrity Release Overview and Common Tools What's New . Supported Platforms and Operating Systems Platform and Architecture X86_64 (lnx86) Windows (64 bit) Development OS RHEL 8.4 Windows Server 2022 Supported OS RHEL 8.4 and above RHEL 9 SLES 15 (SP3 and above) Windows 10 Windows 11 Windows Server 2019 Windows Server 2022 Systems Analysis 2024.1 Clarity 3D Solver Clarity 3D Layout Structure Optimization Workflow : A new workflow, Clarity 3D Layout Structure Optimization Workflow, has been added to Clarity 3D Layout. This workflow integrates Allegro PCB Designer with Clarity 3D Layout for high-speed structure optimization. Component Geometry Model Editor : The new Clarity 3D Layout editor lets you set up ports, solder bumps/balls/extrusions, and two-terminal and multi-terminal circuits using a single GUI. Coaxial Open Port Option Added to Port Setup Wizard : The Coaxial Open Port option lets you create ports for each target net pin and reference net pin in Clarity 3D Layout. The nearby reference net pins are then used as a reference for each target net pin, reducing the number of ports needed. In addition, the ports of unused reference net pins are shorted to the ground. Parametric Import Option Added : Two new options, Parametric Import and Default Import , have been added to the Tools – Launch Clarity3DWorkbench menu. The Parametric Import option lets you import the design along with its parameters into Clarity 3D Workbench. The Default Import option lets you ignore the parameters when importing the design into Clarity 3D Workbench. Component Library Added to Generate 3D Components : Clarity 3D Workbench now includes a new component library that lets you use predefined 3D component templates or add existing 3D components to create 3D designs and simulation models. AI-Powered Content Search Capability : Clarity 3D Workbench and Clarity 3D Transient Solver now support an AI-powered capability for searching the content and displaying relevant information. Expression Parser to Handle Undefined Parameters : Clarity 3D Workbench and Clarity 3D Transient Solver support writing expressions or equations containing undefined parameters in the Property window to describe a simulation variable. The improved expression parser automatically detects any undefined parameter in an expression and prompts users to specify their values. This capability lets you define a model or a simulation variable as a function instead of specifying static values. For detailed information, refer to Clarity 3D Layout User Guide and Clarity 3D Workbench User Guide on the Cadence Support portal. Clarity 3D Transient Solver Mesh Processing Improved to Simulate Large Use Cases : Clarity 3D Transient Solver leverages a new meshing algorithm that enhances overall mesh processing, specifically for large designs and use cases. The new algorithm dramatically improves the mesh quality, minimum mesh size, number of mesh key points, total mesh number, and memory usage. Advanced Material Processing Engine : The material processing capability has been enhanced to handle thin outer metal, which previously resulted in open and short issues in some designs. In addition, the material processing engine offers improved mode extraction for particular use cases, including waveguide and coaxial designs. Characteristic Impedance Calculation Improved : The solver engine now uses a new analytical calculation method to calculate the characteristic impedance of coaxial designs with improved accuracy. For detailed information, refer to Clarity 3D Transient Solver User Guide on the Cadence Support portal. Celsius Studio Celsius Interchange Model Introduced : Celsius Studio now supports Celsius Interchange Model generation, which is a 3D model derived from detailed physical designs for multi-physics and multi-scale analysis. This Celsius Interchange Model file ( .cim ) serves as a design information carrier across Celsius Studio tools, enabling a variety of simulation and analysis tasks . Celsius 3DIC Thermal Workflow Improvements : The Thermal Simulation workflows in Celsius 3DIC have been significantly enhanced. Key improvements include: Advanced Power Setup with Transient Power Function and Multi Mode options Enhanced GUI for the Mesh Control and Simulation Control tabs Improved meshing capabilities Celsius Interchange Model ( .cim ) generation Material library support for block and connections Import of Heat Transfer Coefficients (HTCs) from a CFD file Bump creation through the Bump Array Wizard Layer Stackup CSV file generation Celsius 3DIC Warpage and Stress Workflow Enhancements : The Warpage and Stress workflow in Celsius 3DIC has undergone significant improvements, such as: Improved multi-stage warpage simulation flow for 3DIC packaging process Enhanced GUI for the Mesh Control , Simulation Control , and Stress Boundary Conditions tabs Support for large deformations and temperature profiles Bump creation through the Bump Array Wizard New constraint types Enhanced meshing capabilities Geometric Nonlinearity Support in Warpage and Stress Analysis : Large deformation analysis is now supported in warpage and stress studies. This study uses the Total Lagrangian approach to model geometric nonlinearities in simulation, which allows accurate prediction of final deformations. Thermal Network Extraction and Simulation : In the solid extraction flow in Celsius 3D Workbench, you can now import area-based power map files to create terminals. For designs with multiple blocks, this capability allows automatic terminal creation, eliminating the need to manually create and set up 2D sheets individually. Additionally, thermal throttling feature is now supported in Celsius Thermal Network. This makes it ideal for preliminary analyses or when a quick estimation is required. It runs significantly faster than 3D models, allowing for quicker iterations and more efficient decision-making. For detailed information, refer to the Celsius 3DIC User Guide , Celsius Layout User Guide and Celsius 3D Workbench User Guide on the Cadence Support portal. Sigrity 2024.1 Layout Workbench Improved Graphical User Interface : A new option, Use Improved User Interface , has been added in the Themes page of the Options dialog box in the Layout Workbench GUI. In the new GUI, the toolbar icons and menu options have been enhanced and rearranged. For detailed information, refer to Layout Workbench User Guide on the Cadence Support portal. Broadband SPICE Python Script Integration with Command Line for Simulation Tasks : Broadband SPICE lets you run Python scripts directly from the command line for performing simulation and analysis. The new -py and *.py options make it easier to integrate Python scripts with the command-line operations. This update streamlines the process of automating and customizing simulations from the command line, which makes your simulation tasks faster and easier. For detailed information, refer to Broadband SPICE User Guide on the Cadence Support portal. Celsius PowerDC Block Power Assignment (BPA) File Format Support : PowerDC now supports the BPA file format. Similar to the Pin Location (PLOC) file, the BPA file is a current assignment file that defines the total current of a power grid cell, which is then equally distributed across the power pins within the cell. This provides better control over the power distribution. Ability to Run Multiple IR Drop Cases Sequentially : You can now select multiple result sinks from the Current-Limited IR Drop flow and run IR Drop analysis for them sequentially. PowerDC automatically runs the simulations in sequence after you select multiple result sinks. This saves time by automating the process. Enhanced Support for Mixed Conversion Devices : PowerDC now supports mixing different conversion devices, such as switching regulators and linear regulators within a single DC-DC/LDO instance. This enhancement offers added flexibility by letting you configure each instance in your design according to your specific needs. For detailed information, refer to PowerDC User Guide on the Cadence Support portal. PowerSI Monte Carlo Method Added : A new option, Monte Carlo Method, has been added in the Optimality dialog box. This option lets you create multiple random samples to depict variations in the input parameters and assess the output. Channel Check Optimization Added : The S-Parameter Assessment workflow in PowerSI now supports Channel Check Optimization . It uses the AI-driven Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization (MDAO) technology that lets you optimize your design quickly and efficiently with no accuracy loss. For detailed information, refer to PowerSI User Guide on the Cadence Support portal. SPEEDEM Multi-threaded Matrix Solver Support Added : The Enable Multi-threaded Matrix Solver check box has been added that lets you accelerate the simulation speed for high-performance computing. This check box provides two options, Automatic and Always, to include the -lhpc4 or -lhpc5 parameter, respectively, in the SPEEDEM Simulator (SPDSIM) before running the simulation. For detailed information, refer to the SPEEDEM User Guide on the Cadence Support portal. XtractIM Options to Skip or Calculate Special DC-R Simulation Results : The Skip DC_R of Each Path and Only DC_R of Each Path options have been added to the Setup menu. Skip DC_R of Each Path : This option lets you skip the calculation of the DC-R result during the simulation. Other results, such as SPICE T-model , RL_C of Each Path , Coupling of Each Path , etc., are still calculated. Only DC_R of Each Path : This option lets you calculate the DC-R result only during the simulation. Other results, such as SPICE T-model , RL_C of Each Path , Coupling of Each Path , etc., are not calculated. Color Assignment for Pin Matching : The MCP Auto Connection window includes the Display Color Editor , which lets you assign a color for pin matching. It helps you easily identify the matching pins in the left and right sections of the MCP Auto Connection window . Ability to Save Simulations Individually : The Save each simulation individually check box has been added to the Tools - Options - Edit Options - Simulation (Basic) - General form. Select this check box and run the simulation to generate a simulation results folder containing files and logs with a timestamp for each simulation. Reuse of SPD File Settings : The XtractIM setup check box lets you import an existing package setup to reuse the configurations and settings from one .spd file to another. For detailed information, refer to XtractIM User Guide on the Cadence Support portal. Documentation Enhancements Cloud-Based Help System Upgraded The cloud-based help system, Doc Assistant, has been upgraded to version 24.10, which contains several new features and enhancements over the previous 2.03 version. Sigrity Release Team Please send your questions and feedback to sigrity_rmt@cadence.com .

This November, the engineering and simulation community is set to converge in China for an event that promises to be nothing short of revolutionary. The 2024 BETA CAE Systems China Open Meeting, taking place in the vibrant cities of Beijing and Shanghai on November 5 and 7 , respectively, is a must-attend for anyone looking to stay at the forefront of technological innovation in simulation solutions. Prepare to be inspired by Ben Gu , the visionary Corporate VP of Research and Development at Cadence. He will lead both meetings in Beijing and Shanghai with his keynote on " A New Millennium in Multiphysics System Analysis ." This thought-provoking keynote is expected to provide attendees with a glimpse into the future of engineering simulation and analysis. What sets the BETA CAE Systems Open Meetings apart is not just the high caliber of speakers but also the hands-on training sessions designed to enhance your technical expertise with the BETA CAE software suite. Whether you are an inexperienced individual seeking to acquire fundamental knowledge or an accomplished professional endeavoring to hone your expertise, these training sessions following the open meetings are meticulously tailored to meet your needs. Join Us at the BETA CAE Systems Open Meeting in Beijing The BETA CAE Systems Open Meeting in Beijing will feature a keynote speech by Peng Qiao , Senior Engineer at Great Wall Motors Co., Ltd, on Multidisciplinary Optimization Techniques for Automotive Control Arms . ( View detailed agenda for Beijing. ) When: November 5, 2024 Where: Grand Metropark Hotel Beijing If this sounds interesting, register today for the BETA CAE Systems Beijing Open Meeting by clicking the button below. Don't Miss Out on the BETA CAE Systems Open Meeting in Shanghai After the BETA CAE Systems Open Meeting in Beijing, the next meeting in China will be in Shanghai. During this event, Liu Deping, CAE Engineer from Zhejiang Geely Automobile Research Institute Co., Ltd, will deliver a keynote speech on the Application of ANSA in the Simulation Development Cycle . ( View detailed agenda for Shanghai. ) When: November 7, 2024 Where: InterContinental Shanghai Jing'an Following the open meeting on November 7 will be an exclusive training day on November 8. This session will provide attendees with practical experience using the BETA CAE software to improve their technical skills and provide hands-on knowledge of the software. If you find this intriguing, register now for the BETA CAE Systems Shanghai Open Meeting by clicking the button below. Why Attend? Gain firsthand insights into the latest developments in simulation technology Learn from real-world applications and success stories from various industries Connect and exchange ideas with experts in a collaborative environment Mark your calendars for this unparalleled opportunity to explore the forefront of simulation technology. Whether you're aiming to broaden your knowledge, enhance your technical skills, or connect with industry leaders, the BETA CAE Systems Open Meetings are your gateway to the future of engineering. Join us and be part of shaping the next wave of innovation in the simulation world.

When the Arduino Mega2560 is added to the first serial port, the dynamic memory is 2000 bytes, and when the second serial serial is added, the dynamic memory is 4000 bytes. Now I need to add the third Serial serial port. The dynamic memory is 6000 bytes. Due to the many variables in the program itself, the dynamic memory is not enough. Please help me how to save the dynamic memory?

Cadence_SPB_17.4-2019 + Matlab R2019a

请参考本文档中的步骤进行操作

1，打开BJT_AMP.opj

2，设置Matlab路径

3，打开BJT_AMP_SLPS.slx

4，打开后，设置PSpiceBlock，出现或CEFSimpleUI.exe停止工作

5，添加模块

6，相同

7，打开pspsim.slx

8，相同

9，打开C： Cadence Cadence_SPB_17.4-2019 tools bin

orCEFSimpleUI.exe和orCEFSimple.exe

10，相同

我想问一下如何解决，非常感谢！

Please give me some ideas. Thank you very much.

Hello everyone. In recent days, I'm having a weird problem with sound output on my Windows 10 PC. In fact, I can't control the loudness of it. So is there any possibility of PCB of sound card being damaged?

This is the 15th installment of The Rationalist, my column for the Times of India.

It’s election season, and promises are raining down on voters like rose petals on naïve newlyweds. Earlier this week, the Congress party announced a minimum income guarantee for the poor. This Friday, the Modi government released a budget full of sops. As the days go by, the promises will get bolder, and you might feel important that so much attention is being given to you. Well, the joke is on you.

Every election, HL Mencken once said, is “an advance auction sale of stolen goods.” A bunch of competing mafias fight to rule over you for the next five years. You decide who wins, on the basis of who can bribe you better with your own money. This is an absurd situation, which I tried to express in a limerick I wrote for this page a couple of years ago:

POLITICS: A neta who loves currency notes/ Told me what his line of work denotes./ ‘It is kind of funny./ We steal people’s money/And use some of it to buy their votes.’

We’re the dupes here, and we pay far more to keep this circus going than this circus costs. It would be okay if the parties, once they came to power, provided good governance. But voters have given up on that, and now only want patronage and handouts. That leads to one of the biggest problems in Indian politics: We are stuck in an equilibrium where all good politics is bad economics, and vice versa.

For example, the minimum guarantee for the poor is good politics, because the optics are great. It’s basically Garibi Hatao: that slogan made Indira Gandhi a political juggernaut in the 1970s, at the same time that she unleashed a series of economic policies that kept millions of people in garibi for decades longer than they should have been.

This time, the Congress has released no details, and keeping it vague makes sense because I find it hard to see how it can make economic sense. Depending on how they define ‘poor’, how much income they offer and what the cost is, the plan will either be ineffective or unworkable.

The Modi government’s interim budget announced a handout for poor farmers that seemed rather pointless. Given our agricultural distress, offering a poor farmer 500 bucks a month seems almost like mockery.

Such condescending handouts solve nothing. The poor want jobs and opportunities. Those come with growth, which requires structural reforms. Structural reforms don’t sound sexy as election promises. Handouts do.

A classic example is farm loan waivers. We have reached a stage in our politics where every party has to promise them to assuage farmers, who are a strong vote bank everywhere. You can’t blame farmers for wanting them – they are a necessary anaesthetic. But no government has yet made a serious attempt at tackling the root causes of our agricultural crisis.

Why is it that Good Politics in India is always Bad Economics? Let me put forth some possible reasons. One, voters tend to think in zero-sum ways, as if the pie is fixed, and the only way to bring people out of poverty is to redistribute. The truth is that trade is a positive-sum game, and nations can only be lifted out of poverty when the whole pie grows. But this is unintuitive.

Two, Indian politics revolves around identity and patronage. The spoils of power are limited – that is indeed a zero-sum game – so you’re likely to vote for whoever can look after the interests of your in-group rather than care about the economy as a whole.

Three, voters tend to stay uninformed for good reasons, because of what Public Choice economists call Rational Ignorance. A single vote is unlikely to make a difference in an election, so why put in the effort to understand the nuances of economics and governance? Just ask, what is in it for me, and go with whatever seems to be the best answer.

Four, Politicians have a short-term horizon, geared towards winning the next election. A good policy that may take years to play out is unattractive. A policy that will win them votes in the short term is preferable.

Sadly, no Indian party has shown a willingness to aim for the long term. The Congress has produced new Gandhis, but not new ideas. And while the BJP did make some solid promises in 2014, they did not walk that talk, and have proved to be, as Arun Shourie once called them, UPA + Cow. Even the Congress is adopting the cow, in fact, so maybe the BJP will add Temple to that mix?

Benjamin Franklin once said, “Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.” This election season, my friends, the people of India are on the menu. You have been deveined and deboned, marinated with rhetoric, seasoned with narrative – now enter the oven and vote.

The India Uncut Blog © 2010 Amit Varma. All rights reserved.
Follow me on Twitter.

This is the 16th installment of The Rationalist, my column for the Times of India.

Steven Pinker, in his book Enlightenment Now, relates an old Russian joke about two peasants named Boris and Igor. They are both poor. Boris has a goat. Igor does not. One day, Igor is granted a wish by a visiting fairy. What will he wish for?

“I wish,” he says, “that Boris’s goat should die.”

The joke ends there, revealing as much about human nature as about economics. Consider the three things that happen if the fairy grants the wish. One, Boris becomes poorer. Two, Igor stays poor. Three, inequality reduces. Is any of them a good outcome?

I feel exasperated when I hear intellectuals and columnists talking about economic inequality. It is my contention that India’s problem is poverty – and that poverty and inequality are two very different things that often do not coincide.

To illustrate this, I sometimes ask this question: In which of the following countries would you rather be poor: USA or Bangladesh? The obvious answer is USA, where the poor are much better off than the poor of Bangladesh. And yet, while Bangladesh has greater poverty, the USA has higher inequality.

Indeed, take a look at the countries of the world measured by the Gini Index, which is that standard metric used to measure inequality, and you will find that USA, Hong Kong, Singapore and the United Kingdom all have greater inequality than Bangladesh, Liberia, Pakistan and Sierra Leone, which are much poorer. And yet, while the poor of Bangladesh would love to migrate to unequal USA, I don’t hear of too many people wishing to go in the opposite direction.

Indeed, people vote with their feet when it comes to choosing between poverty and inequality. All of human history is a story of migration from rural areas to cities – which have greater inequality.

If poverty and inequality are so different, why do people conflate the two? A key reason is that we tend to think of the world in zero-sum ways. For someone to win, someone else must lose. If the rich get richer, the poor must be getting poorer, and the presence of poverty must be proof of inequality.

But that’s not how the world works. The pie is not fixed. Economic growth is a positive-sum game and leads to an expansion of the pie, and everybody benefits. In absolute terms, the rich get richer, and so do the poor, often enough to come out of poverty. And so, in any growing economy, as poverty reduces, inequality tends to increase. (This is counter-intuitive, I know, so used are we to zero-sum thinking.) This is exactly what has happened in India since we liberalised parts of our economy in 1991.

Most people who complain about inequality in India are using the wrong word, and are really worried about poverty. Put a millionaire in a room with a billionaire, and no one will complain about the inequality in that room. But put a starving beggar in there, and the situation is morally objectionable. It is the poverty that makes it a problem, not the inequality.

You might think that this is just semantics, but words matter. Poverty and inequality are different phenomena with opposite solutions. You can solve for inequality by making everyone equally poor. Or you could solve for it by redistributing from the rich to the poor, as if the pie was fixed. The problem with this, as any economist will tell you, is that there is a trade-off between redistribution and growth. All redistribution comes at the cost of growing the pie – and only growth can solve the problem of poverty in a country like ours.

It has been estimated that in India, for every one percent rise in GDP, two million people come out of poverty. That is a stunning statistic. When millions of Indians don’t have enough money to eat properly or sleep with a roof over their heads, it is our moral imperative to help them rise out of poverty. The policies that will make this possible – allowing free markets, incentivising investment and job creation, removing state oppression – are likely to lead to greater inequality. So what? It is more urgent to make sure that every Indian has enough to fulfil his basic needs – what the philosopher Harry Frankfurt, in his fine book On Inequality, called the Doctrine of Sufficiency.

The elite in their airconditioned drawing rooms, and those who live in rich countries, can follow the fashions of the West and talk compassionately about inequality. India does not have that luxury.

The India Uncut Blog © 2010 Amit Varma. All rights reserved.
Follow me on Twitter.

This is the 17th installment of The Rationalist, my column for the Times of India.

One of my favourite English words comes from chess. If it is your turn to move, but any move you make makes your position worse, you are in ‘Zugzwang’. Narendra Modi was in zugzwang after the Pulwama attacks a few days ago—as any Indian prime minister in his place would have been.

An Indian PM, after an attack for which Pakistan is held responsible, has only unsavoury choices in front of him. He is pulled in two opposite directions. One, strategy dictates that he must not escalate. Two, politics dictates that he must.

Let’s unpack that. First, consider the strategic imperatives. Ever since both India and Pakistan became nuclear powers, a conventional war has become next to impossible because of the threat of a nuclear war. If India escalates beyond a point, Pakistan might bring their nuclear weapons into play. Even a limited nuclear war could cause millions of casualties and devastate our economy. Thus, no matter what the provocation, India needs to calibrate its response so that the Pakistan doesn’t take it all the way.

It’s impossible to predict what actions Pakistan might view as sufficient provocation, so India has tended to play it safe. Don’t capture territory, don’t attack military assets, don’t kill civilians. In other words, surgical strikes on alleged terrorist camps is the most we can do.

Given that Pakistan knows that it is irrational for India to react, and our leaders tend to be rational, they can ‘bleed us with a thousand cuts’, as their doctrine states, with impunity. Both in 2001, when our parliament was attacked and the BJP’s Atal Bihari Vajpayee was PM, and in 2008, when Mumbai was attacked and the Congress’s Manmohan Singh was PM, our leaders considered all the options on the table—but were forced to do nothing.

But is doing nothing an option in an election year?

Leave strategy aside and turn to politics. India has been attacked. Forty soldiers have been killed, and the nation is traumatised and baying for blood. It is now politically impossible to not retaliate—especially for a PM who has criticized his predecessor for being weak, and portrayed himself as a 56-inch-chested man of action.

I have no doubt that Modi is a rational man, and knows the possible consequences of escalation. But he also knows the possible consequences of not escalating—he could dilute his brand and lose the elections. Thus, he is forced to act. And after he acts, his Pakistan counterpart will face the same domestic pressure to retaliate, and will have to attack back. And so on till my home in Versova is swallowed up by a nuclear crater, right?

Well, not exactly. There is a way to resolve this paradox. India and Pakistan can both escalate, not via military actions, but via optics.

Modi and Imran Khan, who you’d expect to feel like the loneliest men on earth right now, can find sweet company in each other. Their incentives are aligned. Neither man wants this to turn into a full-fledged war. Both men want to appear macho in front of their domestic constituencies. Both men are masters at building narratives, and have a pliant media that will help them.

Thus, India can carry out a surgical strike and claim it destroyed a camp, killed terrorists, and forced Pakistan to return a braveheart prisoner of war. Pakistan can say India merely destroyed two trees plus a rock, and claim the high moral ground by returning the prisoner after giving him good masala tea. A benign military equilibrium is maintained, and both men come out looking like strong leaders: a win-win game for the PMs that avoids a lose-lose game for their nations. They can give themselves a high-five in private when they meet next, and Imran can whisper to Modi, “You’re a good spinner, bro.”

There is one problem here, though: what if the optics don’t work?

If Modi feels that his public is too sceptical and he needs to do more, he might feel forced to resort to actual military escalation. The fog of politics might obscure the possible consequences. If the resultant Indian military action causes serious damage, Pakistan will have to respond in kind. In the chain of events that then begins, with body bags piling up, neither man may be able to back down. They could end up as prisoners of circumstance—and so could we.

***

Also check out:

Why Modi Must Learn to Play the Game of Chicken With Pakistan—Amit Varma
The Two Pakistans—Episode 79 of The Seen and the Unseen
India in the Nuclear Age—Episode 80 of The Seen and the Unseen

The India Uncut Blog © 2010 Amit Varma. All rights reserved.
Follow me on Twitter.

This is the 21st installment of The Rationalist, my column for the Times of India.

When all political parties agree on something, you know you might have a problem. Giriraj Singh, a minister in Narendra Modi’s new cabinet, tweeted this week that our population control law should become a “movement.” This is something that would find bipartisan support – we are taught from school onwards that India’s population is a big problem, and we need to control it.

This is wrong. Contrary to popular belief, our population is not a problem. It is our greatest strength.

The notion that we should worry about a growing population is an intuitive one. The world has limited resources. People keep increasing. Something’s gotta give.

Robert Malthus made just this point in his 1798 book, An Essay on the Principle of Population. He was worried that our population would grow exponentially while resources would grow arithmetically. As more people entered the workforce, wages would fall and goods would become scarce. Calamity was inevitable.

Malthus’s rationale was so influential that this mode of thinking was soon called ‘Malthusian.’ (It is a pejorative today.) A 20th-century follower of his, Harrison Brown, came up with one of my favourite images on this subject, arguing that a growing population would lead to the earth being “covered completely and to a considerable depth with a writhing mass of human beings, much as a dead cow is covered with a pulsating mass of maggots.”

Another Malthusian, Paul Ehrlich, published a book called The Population Bomb in 1968, which began with the stirring lines, “The battle to feed all of humanity is over. In the 1970s hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now.” Ehrlich was, as you’d guess, a big supporter of India’s coercive family planning programs. ““I don’t see,” he wrote, “how India could possibly feed two hundred million more people by 1980.”

None of these fears have come true. A 2007 study by Nicholas Eberstadt called ‘Too Many People?’ found no correlation between population density and poverty. The greater the density of people, the more you’d expect them to fight for resources – and yet, Monaco, which has 40 times the population density of Bangladesh, is doing well for itself. So is Bahrain, which has three times the population density of India.

Not only does population not cause poverty, it makes us more prosperous. The economist Julian Simon pointed out in a 1981 book that through history, whenever there has been a spurt in population, it has coincided with a spurt in productivity. Such as, for example, between Malthus’s time and now. There were around a billion people on earth in 1798, and there are around 7.7 billion today. As you read these words, consider that you are better off than the richest person on the planet then.

Why is this? The answer lies in the title of Simon’s book: The Ultimate Resource. When we speak of resources, we forget that human beings are the finest resource of all. There is no limit to our ingenuity. And we interact with each other in positive-sum ways – every voluntary interactions leaves both people better off, and the amount of value in the world goes up. This is why we want to be part of economic networks that are as large, and as dense, as possible. This is why most people migrate to cities rather than away from them – and why cities are so much richer than towns or villages.

If Malthusians were right, essential commodities like wheat, maize and rice would become relatively scarcer over time, and thus more expensive – but they have actually become much cheaper in real terms. This is thanks to the productivity and creativity of humans, who, in Eberstadt’s words, are “in practice always renewable and in theory entirely inexhaustible.”

The error made by Malthus, Brown and Ehrlich is the same error that our politicians make today, and not just in the context of population: zero-sum thinking. If our population grows and resources stays the same, of course there will be scarcity. But this is never the case. All we need to do to learn this lesson is look at our cities!

This mistaken thinking has had savage humanitarian consequences in India. Think of the unborn millions over the decades because of our brutal family planning policies. How many Tendulkars, Rahmans and Satyajit Rays have we lost? Think of the immoral coercion still carried out on poor people across the country. And finally, think of the condescension of our politicians, asserting that people are India’s problem – but always other people, never themselves.

This arrogance is India’s greatest problem, not our people.

The India Uncut Blog © 2010 Amit Varma. All rights reserved.
Follow me on Twitter.

This is the 23rd installment of The Rationalist, my column for the Times of India.

I had a strange dream last night. I dreamt that the government had passed a law that made using laptops illegal. I would have to write this column by hand. I would also have to leave my home in Mumbai to deliver it in person to my editor in Delhi. I woke up trembling and angry – and realised how Indian farmers feel every single day of their lives.

My column today is a tale of two satyagrahas. Both involve farmers, technology and the freedom of choice. One of them began this month – but first, let us go back to the turn of the millennium.

As the 1990s came to an end, cotton farmers across India were in distress. Pests known as bollworms were ravaging crops across the country. Farmers had to use increasing amounts of pesticide to keep them at bay. The costs of the pesticide and the amount of labour involved made it unviable – and often, the crops would fail anyway.

Then, technology came to the rescue. The farmers heard of Bt Cotton, a genetically modified type of cotton that kept these pests away, and was being used around the world. But they were illegal in India, even though no bad effects had ever been recorded. Well, who cares about ‘illegal’ when it is a matter of life and death?

Farmers in Gujarat got hold of Bt Cotton seeds from the black market and planted them. You’ll never guess what happened next. As 2002 began, all cotton crops in Gujarat failed – except the 10,000 hectares that had Bt Cotton. The government did not care about the failed crops. They cared about the ‘illegal’ ones. They ordered all the Bt Cotton crops to be destroyed.

It was time for a satyagraha – and not just in Gujarat. The late Sharad Joshi, leader of the Shetkari Sanghatana in Maharashtra, took around 10,000 farmers to Gujarat to stand with their fellows there. They sat in the fields of Bt Cotton and basically said, ‘Over our dead bodies.’ ¬Joshi’s point was simple: all other citizens of India have access to the latest technology from all over. They are all empowered with choice. Why should farmers be held back?

The satyagraha was successful. The ban on Bt Cotton was lifted.

There are three things I would like to point out here. One, the lifting of the ban transformed cotton farming in India. Over 90% of Indian farmers now use Bt Cotton. India has become the world’s largest producer of cotton, moving ahead of China. According to agriculture expert Ashok Gulati, India has gained US$ 67 billion in the years since from higher exports and import savings because of Bt Cotton. Most importantly, cotton farmers’ incomes have doubled.

Two, GMO crops have become standard across the world. Around 190 million hectares of GMO crops have been planted worldwide, and GMO foods are accepted in 67 countries. The humanitarian benefits have been massive: Golden Rice, a variety of rice packed with minerals and vitamins, has prevented blindness in countless new-born kids since it was introduced in the Philippines.

Three, despite the fear-mongering of some NGOs, whose existence depends on alarmism, the science behind GMO is settled. No harmful side effects have been noted in all these years, and millions of lives impacted positively. A couple of years ago, over 100 Nobel Laureates signed a petition asserting that GMO foods were safe, and blasting anti-science NGOs that stood in the way of progress. There is scientific consensus on this.

The science may be settled, but the politics is not. The government still bans some types of GMO seeds, such as Bt Brinjal, which was developed by an Indian company called Mahyco, and used successfully in Bangladesh. More crucially, a variety called HT Bt Cotton, which fights weeds, is also banned. Weeding takes up to 15% of a farmer’s time, and often makes farming unviable. Farmers across the world use this variant – 60% of global cotton crops are HT Bt. Indian farmers are so desperate for it that they choose to break the law and buy expensive seeds from the black market – but the government is cracking down. A farmer in Haryana had his crop destroyed by the government in May.

On June 10 this year, a farmer named Lalit Bahale in the Akola District of Maharashtra kicked off a satyagraha by planting banned seeds of HT Bt Cotton and Bt Brinjal. He was soon joined by thousands of farmers. Far from our urban eyes, a heroic fight has begun. Our farmers, already victimised and oppressed by a predatory government in countless ways, are fighting for their right to take charge of their lives.

As this brave struggle unfolds, I am left with a troubling question: All those satyagrahas of the past by our great freedom fighters, what were they for, if all they got us was independence and not freedom?

The India Uncut Blog © 2010 Amit Varma. All rights reserved.
Follow me on Twitter.

Virtuoso Studio IC23.1 ISR7 production release is now available for download.(read more)

Have you ever wanted to write a DRC rule deck to check for space or width constraints on polygons? Or have you wondered how the multiple lines of an LVS rule deck extract and conduct a comparison between the schematic and layout? Maybe you've been curious about the role of rule deck writers in creating high-quality designs ready for tape-out.

If any of these questions interest you, there is good news: the latest version (v23.1) of the Physical Verification Rules Writer (PVLRW) course is designed to teach you rule deck writing. This free 16-hour online course includes audio and labs designed to make your learning experience comfortable and flexible. Whether you are new to the concept or an experienced CAD/PDK engineer, the course is structured to enhance your rule deck writing skills.

The PVLRW course covers six core modules: Layer Processing, DRC Rules, Layout Extraction, ERC and LVS Rules, Schematic Netlisting, and Coloring Rules. There are also three optional appendix sections. Each module explains relevant rules with syntax, concepts, graphics, examples, and case studies.

This course is based on tool versions PEGASUS231 and Virtuoso Studio IC231.

Pegasus Input and Output

Pegasus is a cloud-ready physical verification signoff solution that enables engineers to support faster delivery of advanced-node integrated circuits (ICs) to market.

Pegasus requires input data in the form of layout geometry, schematic netlists, and rules that direct the tool operation. The rules fall into two categories: those that describe the fabrication process and those that control the job-specific operation.

Pegasus provides log and report files, netlists, databases, and error databases as output.

Overview of Pegasus Rule File

The rule decks written in Physical Verification Language (PVL) work for the Cadence PV signoff tools Pegasus and PVS (Physical Verification System).   

The PVL rules are placed in a file that gets selected in a run from the GUI or the command line, as the user directs. PVL rules may be on separate lines within the file and can also be contained in named rule blocks.

Each line of code starts with a PVL rule that uses prefix type notation. It consists of a keyword followed by options, input layer or variable names, and output layer or variable names.

A rule block has the format of the keyword rule, followed by a rule name you wish to give it, followed by an opening curly brace. You enter the rules you wish to perform, followed by a closing curly brace on the last separate line.

  Sample Rule deck with individual lines of code and rule blocks.

DRC Rules

The first step in a typical Pegasus flow is a Design Rule Check (DRC), which verifies that layout geometries conform to the minimum width, spacing, and other fabrication process rules required by an IC foundry. Each foundry specifies its own process-dependent rules that must be met by the layout design.

There are three types of DRC rules: layer definition rules, layer derivation rules, and DRC design check rules. Layer definition rules identify the layers contained in the input layout database, and layer derivation rules derive additional layers from the original input layers, allowing the tool to test the design against specific foundry requirements using the design check rules.

A sample DRC Rule deck

A layout view displaying the DRC violations

LVS Rules

The Pegasus Layout Versus Schematic (LVS) tool compares the layout netlist with the schematic netlist to check for discrepancies.

There are two essential LVS rule sets: LVS extraction rules and comparison rules. LVS extraction rules help extract drawn devices and connectivity information from the input layout geometry data and outputs into a layout netlist. The LVS extraction rule set also includes the layer definition, derivation, extraction, connectivity, and net listing rules.

LVS comparison rules are associated with comparing the extracted layout netlist to a schematic netlist.

A sample LVS Rule deck. 

TCL, Macros, and Conditional commands

Tcl is supported and used in various Pegasus functionalities, such as Pegasus rule files and Pegasus configurator. Macros are functional templates that are defined once and can be used multiple times in a rule file. Conditional Commands are used to process or skip specific commands in the rule file.

Do You Have Access to the Cadence Support Portal?

If not, follow the steps below to create your account.

• On the Cadence Support portal, select Register Now and provide the requested information on the Registration page.
• You will need an email address and host ID to sign up.
• If you need help with registration, contact support@cadence.com.

To stay up to date with the latest news and information about Cadence training and webinars, subscribe to the Cadence Training emails.

If you have questions about courses, schedules, online, public, or live onsite training, reach out to us at Cadence Training.

For any questions, general feedback, or future blog topic suggestions, please leave a comment.

Related Resources

About Knowledge Booster Training Bytes

Knowledge Booster Training Bytes is an online journal that relays information about Cadence Training videos, online courses, and upcoming webinars in the Learning section of the Cadence Learning and Support portal. This blog category brings you direct links to these videos, courses, and other related material on a regular basis. Subscribe to receive email notifications about our latest Custom IC Design blog posts.

Virtuoso Studio IC23.1 ISR8 production release is now available for download.(read more)

Read this blog to know more about the innovation behind Universal Connect Modules (UCM).(read more)

Virtuoso Studio IC23.1 ISR9 production release is now available for download.(read more)

The SPECTRE 24.1 release is now available for download at Cadence Downloads. For information on supported platforms and other release compatibility information, see the README.txt file in the installation hierarchy.(read more)

Virtuoso Studio IC23.1 ISR10 production release is now available for download.(read more)