Reaction and analysis from Fox News contributor Byron York and former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi.

Andrea Cremaschi, Raffaele Argiento, Katherine Shoemaker, Christine Peterson, Marina Vannucci.

Source: Bayesian Analysis, Volume 14, Number 4, 1271--1301.

Abstract:
Gaussian graphical models are useful tools for exploring network structures in multivariate normal data. In this paper we are interested in situations where data show departures from Gaussianity, therefore requiring alternative modeling distributions. The multivariate $t$ -distribution, obtained by dividing each component of the data vector by a gamma random variable, is a straightforward generalization to accommodate deviations from normality such as heavy tails. Since different groups of variables may be contaminated to a different extent, Finegold and Drton (2014) introduced the Dirichlet $t$ -distribution, where the divisors are clustered using a Dirichlet process. In this work, we consider a more general class of nonparametric distributions as the prior on the divisor terms, namely the class of normalized completely random measures (NormCRMs). To improve the effectiveness of the clustering, we propose modeling the dependence among the divisors through a nonparametric hierarchical structure, which allows for the sharing of parameters across the samples in the data set. This desirable feature enables us to cluster together different components of multivariate data in a parsimonious way. We demonstrate through simulations that this approach provides accurate graphical model inference, and apply it to a case study examining the dependence structure in radiomics data derived from The Cancer Imaging Atlas.

Luis Gutiérrez, Andrés F. Barrientos, Jorge González, Daniel Taylor-Rodríguez.

Source: Bayesian Analysis, Volume 14, Number 2, 649--675.

Abstract:
We propose a Bayesian nonparametric strategy to test for differences between a control group and several treatment regimes. Most of the existing tests for this type of comparison are based on the differences between location parameters. In contrast, our approach identifies differences across the entire distribution, avoids strong modeling assumptions over the distributions for each treatment, and accounts for multiple testing through the prior distribution on the space of hypotheses. The proposal is compared to other commonly used hypothesis testing procedures under simulated scenarios. Two real applications are also analyzed with the proposed methodology.

Marko Järvenpää, Michael U. Gutmann, Arijus Pleska, Aki Vehtari, Pekka Marttinen.

Source: Bayesian Analysis, Volume 14, Number 2, 595--622.

Abstract:
Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) is a method for Bayesian inference when the likelihood is unavailable but simulating from the model is possible. However, many ABC algorithms require a large number of simulations, which can be costly. To reduce the computational cost, Bayesian optimisation (BO) and surrogate models such as Gaussian processes have been proposed. Bayesian optimisation enables one to intelligently decide where to evaluate the model next but common BO strategies are not designed for the goal of estimating the posterior distribution. Our paper addresses this gap in the literature. We propose to compute the uncertainty in the ABC posterior density, which is due to a lack of simulations to estimate this quantity accurately, and define a loss function that measures this uncertainty. We then propose to select the next evaluation location to minimise the expected loss. Experiments show that the proposed method often produces the most accurate approximations as compared to common BO strategies.

Quan Zhou, Yongtao Guan.

Source: Bayesian Analysis, Volume 14, Number 2, 573--594.

Abstract:
Bayesian variable selection regression (BVSR) is able to jointly analyze genome-wide genetic datasets, but the slow computation via Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) hampered its wide-spread usage. Here we present a novel iterative method to solve a special class of linear systems, which can increase the speed of the BVSR model-fitting tenfold. The iterative method hinges on the complex factorization of the sum of two matrices and the solution path resides in the complex domain (instead of the real domain). Compared to the Gauss-Seidel method, the complex factorization converges almost instantaneously and its error is several magnitude smaller than that of the Gauss-Seidel method. More importantly, the error is always within the pre-specified precision while the Gauss-Seidel method is not. For large problems with thousands of covariates, the complex factorization is 10–100 times faster than either the Gauss-Seidel method or the direct method via the Cholesky decomposition. In BVSR, one needs to repetitively solve large penalized regression systems whose design matrices only change slightly between adjacent MCMC steps. This slight change in design matrix enables the adaptation of the iterative complex factorization method. The computational innovation will facilitate the wide-spread use of BVSR in reanalyzing genome-wide association datasets.

Ruosi Guo, Chunming Zhang, Zhengjun Zhang.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 35, Number 1, 145--157.

Abstract:
In many scientific disciplines, finding hidden influential factors behind observational data is essential but challenging. The majority of existing approaches, such as the independent component analysis (${mathrm{ICA}}$), rely on linear transformation, that is, true signals are linear combinations of hidden components. Motivated from analyzing nonlinear temporal signals in neuroscience, genetics, and finance, this paper proposes the “maximum independent component analysis” (${mathrm{MaxICA}}$), based on max-linear combinations of components. In contrast to existing methods, ${mathrm{MaxICA}}$ benefits from focusing on significant major components while filtering out ignorable components. A major tool for parameter learning of ${mathrm{MaxICA}}$ is an augmented genetic algorithm, consisting of three schemes for the elite weighted sum selection, randomly combined crossover, and dynamic mutation. Extensive empirical evaluations demonstrate the effectiveness of ${mathrm{MaxICA}}$ in either extracting max-linearly combined essential sources in many applications or supplying a better approximation for nonlinearly combined source signals, such as $mathrm{EEG}$ recordings analyzed in this paper.

Alessandro Rinaldo, Ryan J. Tibshirani, Larry Wasserman.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 34, Number 4, 599--603.

Abstract:
What is the meaning of a regression parameter? Why is this the de facto standard object of interest for statistical inference? These are delicate issues, especially when the model is misspecified. We argue that focusing on predictive quantities may be a desirable alternative.

David Whitney, Ali Shojaie, Marco Carone.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 34, Number 4, 591--598.

Anthony C. Davison, Erwan Koch, Jonathan Koh.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 34, Number 4, 584--590.

Abstract:
This discussion focuses on areas of disagreement with the papers, particularly the target of inference and the case for using the robust ‘sandwich’ variance estimator in the presence of moderate mis-specification. We also suggest that existing procedures may be appreciably more powerful for detecting mis-specification than the authors’ RAV statistic, and comment on the use of the pairs bootstrap in balanced situations.

Roderick J. Little.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 34, Number 4, 580--583.

Nikki L. B. Freeman, Xiaotong Jiang, Owen E. Leete, Daniel J. Luckett, Teeranan Pokaprakarn, Michael R. Kosorok.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 34, Number 4, 572--574.

Jerald F. Lawless.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 34, Number 4, 569--571.

Abstract:
I comment on the papers Models as Approximations I and II, by A. Buja, R. Berk, L. Brown, E. George, E. Pitkin, M. Traskin, L. Zhao and K. Zhang.

Yixin Wang, Andrew C. Miller, David M. Blei.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 34, Number 2, 229--233.

Eitan Greenshtein, Ya’acov Ritov.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 34, Number 2, 224--228.

Abstract:
We present some personal reflections on empirical Bayes/ compound decision (EB/CD) theory following Efron (2019). In particular, we consider the role of exchangeability in the EB/CD theory and how it can be achieved when there are covariates. We also discuss the interpretation of EB/CD confidence interval, the theoretical efficiency of the CD procedure, and the impact of sparsity assumptions.

Wenhua Jiang.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 34, Number 2, 219--223.

Abstract:
This is a contribution to the discussion of the enlightening paper by Professor Efron. We focus on empirical Bayes interval estimation. We discuss the oracle interval estimation rules, the empirical Bayes estimation of the oracle rule and the computation. Some numerical results are reported.

Aad van der Vaart.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 34, Number 2, 214--218.

Roger Koenker, Jiaying Gu.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 34, Number 2, 209--213.

Abstract:
Efron’s elegant approach to $g$-modeling for empirical Bayes problems is contrasted with an implementation of the Kiefer–Wolfowitz nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator for mixture models for several examples. The latter approach has the advantage that it is free of tuning parameters and consequently provides a relatively simple complementary method.

Nan Laird.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 34, Number 2, 206--208.

Thomas A. Louis.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 34, Number 2, 202--205.

Georg Lindgren.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 34, Number 1, 100--128.

Abstract:
We describe and compare how methods based on the classical Rice’s formula for the expected number, and higher moments, of level crossings by a Gaussian process stand up to contemporary numerical methods to accurately deal with crossing related characteristics of the sample paths. We illustrate the relative merits in accuracy and computing time of the Rice moment methods and the exact numerical method, developed since the late 1990s, on three groups of distribution problems, the maximum over a finite interval and the waiting time to first crossing, the length of excursions over a level, and the joint period/amplitude of oscillations. We also treat the notoriously difficult problem of dependence between successive zero crossing distances. The exact solution has been known since at least 2000, but it has remained largely unnoticed outside the ocean science community. Extensive simulation studies illustrate the accuracy of the numerical methods. As a historical introduction an attempt is made to illustrate the relation between Rice’s original formulation and arguments and the exact numerical methods.

Nicole Bohme Carnegie.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 34, Number 1, 90--93.

Abstract:
With a thorough exposition of the methods and results of the 2016 Atlantic Causal Inference Competition, Dorie et al. have set a new standard for reproducibility and comparability of evaluations of causal inference methods. In particular, the open-source R package aciccomp2016, which permits reproduction of all datasets used in the competition, will be an invaluable resource for evaluation of future methodological developments. Building upon results from Dorie et al., we examine whether a set of potential modifications to Bayesian Additive Regression Trees (BART)—multiple chains in model fitting, using the propensity score as a covariate, targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE), and computing symmetric confidence intervals—have a stronger impact on bias, RMSE, and confidence interval coverage in combination than they do alone. We find that bias in the estimate of SATT is minimal, regardless of the BART formulation. For purposes of CI coverage, however, all proposed modifications are beneficial—alone and in combination—but use of TMLE is least beneficial for coverage and results in considerably wider confidence intervals.

Ehud Karavani, Tal El-Hay, Yishai Shimoni, Chen Yanover.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 34, Number 1, 86--89.

Abstract:
Data competitions proved to be highly beneficial to the field of machine learning, and thus expected to provide similar advantages in the field of causal inference. As participants in the 2016 and 2017 Atlantic Causal Inference Conference (ACIC) data competitions and co-organizers of the 2018 competition, we discuss the strengths of simulation-based competitions and suggest potential extensions to address their limitations. These suggested augmentations aim at making the data generating processes more realistic and gradually increase in complexity, allowing thorough investigations of algorithms’ performance. We further outline a community-wide competition framework to evaluate an end-to-end causal inference pipeline, beginning with a causal question and a database, and ending with causal estimates.

Susan Gruber, Mark J. van der Laan.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 34, Number 1, 82--85.

Abstract:
Dorie and co-authors (DHSSC) are to be congratulated for initiating the ACIC Data Challenge. Their project engaged the community and accelerated research by providing a level playing field for comparing the performance of a priori specified algorithms. DHSSC identified themes concerning characteristics of the DGP, properties of the estimators, and inference. We discuss these themes in the context of targeted learning.

1897.

You can save 50% right now. 

Keep your feet comfy and your wallet fat.

Once you try them, you’ll never want to wear anything else

The womenswear line is new, and there’s already a variety of items to shop.

Catherine Mankiw
May 24, 2017; 37:5221-5231
Development Plasticity Repair

RJ Wenthold
Mar 15, 1996; 16:1982-1989
Articles

Fiona Doetsch
Jul 1, 1997; 17:5046-5061
Articles

MN Shadlen
Feb 15, 1996; 16:1486-1510
Articles

RU Muller
Jul 1, 1987; 7:1951-1968
Articles

M Steriade
Aug 1, 1993; 13:3252-3265
Articles

Jamie D. Roitman
Nov 1, 2002; 22:9475-9489
Behavioral

Michael N. Shadlen
May 15, 1998; 18:3870-3896
Articles

KH Britten
Dec 1, 1992; 12:4745-4765
Articles

French translation of the press release about the Basel Committee publishing a discussion paper on "The regulatory treatment of sovereign exposures" (7 December 2017)

French translation of press release - the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision is finalising stress-testing principles, reviews ways to stop regulatory arbitrage behaviour, agrees on annual G-SIB list, discusses leverage ratio, crypto-assets, market risk framework and implementation, 20 September 2018.

French translation of "Pillar 3 disclosure requirements - updated framework", December 2018

French version of Press release about Pablo Hernández de Cos appointed as Chairman of Basel Committee on Banking Supervision

Spanish version of Press release about new members joining the Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (19 March 2018)

Spanish translation of press release - the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision is finalising stress-testing principles, reviews ways to stop regulatory arbitrage behaviour, agrees on annual G-SIB list, discusses leverage ratio, crypto-assets, market risk framework and implementation, 20 September 2018.

Spanish version of Press release about Pablo Hernández de Cos appointed as Chairman of Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, 7 March 2019. Pablo Hernández de Cos, nombrado Presidente del Comité de Supervisión Bancaria de Basilea.

To view more press releases, please visit http://www.snl.com/irweblinkx/news.aspx?iid=1024452.